Many argue that during conflict, executive power expands at the expense of the judiciary and civil liberties. Although this is a common conjecture, no systematic study of conflict and judicial independence exists. We argue that conflict, rather than strictly inhibiting independence, is instead a critical juncture that increases the possibility of institutional change, either positive or negative. We assess this claim in three ways: cross-national analyses of (1) de facto and (2) de jure judicial independence after the onset of conflict, and (3) a case study of statutory and jurisdictional changes to the federal judiciary after the outbreak of the U.S. Civil War. Each illustrates that conflict onset is associated with a higher likelihood of changing levels—both decreases and increases—rather than unidirectional decreases in judicial independence. We then present preliminary hypotheses and analyses for three factors that, given conflict onset, should be associated with either improved or worsened conditions for the judiciary. This study has implications for research on conflict, courts, and the rule of law in both political science and legal studies.
BelgeCeren. 2006. “Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey.” Law & Society Review40 (3): 653–92.
4.
BurbankStephen B.FriedmanBarry. 2002. “Reconsidering Judicial Independence.” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, edited by BurbankStephen B.FriedmanBarry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. pp. 9–43.
5.
CallCharles. 2007. Constructing Justice and Security after War. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
6.
CameronCharles. 2002. “Judicial Independence: How Can You Tell It When You See It? and, Who Cares?” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads, edited by BurbankStevenFriedmanBarry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 134–148.
7.
CapocciaGiovanniKelemenR. Daniel. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics59 (3): 341–69.
8.
CheesmanNick. 2011. “How an Authoritarian Regime in Burma Used Special Courts to Defeat Judicial Independence.” Law & Society Review45 (4): 801–30.
9.
CheibubJose AntonioGandhiJenniferVreelandJames Raymond. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143 (2–1): 67–101.
10.
ChenSiyanLoayzaNorman V.Reynal-QuerolMarta. 2008. “The Aftermath of Civil War.” World Bank Economic Review22 (1): 63–85.
11.
ClarkTom S.2006. “Judicial Decision Making during Wartime.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies3 (3): 397–419.
12.
ColeDavid. 2002. “Enemy Aliens.” Stanford Law Review54:953–1004.
13.
EppCharles R.1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
EpperlyBrad. 2013. “The Provision of Insurance? Judicial Independence and the Post-tenure Fate of Leaders.” Journal of Law and Courts1 (2): 247–78.
15.
EpperlyBrad. 2017. “Political Competition and De Facto Judicial Independence in Non-democracies.” European Journal of Political Research56 (2): 279–300.
16.
EpperlyBradLinebergerMonica. 2017. “Strategic Behavior of Comparative Courts.” In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior, edited by HowardRobert M.RandazzoKirk A.New York: Routledge, pp. 370–388.
17.
EpsteinLeeHoDaniel E.KingGarySegalJeffrey A.2005. “The Supreme Court during Crisis: How War Affects Only Non-war Cases.” New York University Law Review80 (1): 1–116.
18.
FearonJames D.2004. “Why Do Some Civil Wars Last so Much Longer than Others?” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 275–301.
19.
FeldLars P.VoigtStefan. 2003. “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross-country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators.” European Journal of Political Economy19:497–527.
20.
GiblerDougRandazzoKirk A.2011. “Testing the Effects of Independent Judiciaries on the Likelihood of Democratic Backsliding.” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 696–709.
21.
GinsburgTom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GinsburgTom. 2010. “Judicial Independence in East Asia: Implications for China.” In Judicial Independence in China, edited by PeerenboomRandall. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247–259.
23.
GinsburgTomMoustafaTamir. 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHavard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37.
25.
HaggardStephanTiedeLydia. 2014. “The Rule of Law in Post-conflict Settings: The Empirical Record.” International Studies Quarterly58:405–17.
26.
HallKermit L.1975. “The Civil War Era as Crucible for Nationalizing the Lower Federal Courts.” Prologue—Quarterly Journal of the National Archives7 (3): 177–86.
27.
HayoBerndVoigtStefan. 2007. “Explaining De Facto Judicial Independence.” International Review of Law and Economics27 (3): 269–90.
28.
HowardRobert M.CareyHenry F.2003. “Is an Independent Judiciary Necessary for Democracy.” Judicature87:284–90.
29.
HowellWilliam G.AhmedFaisal Z.2012. “Voting for the President: The Supreme Court during War.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization30 (1): 39–71.
30.
KeithLinda Camp. 2002. “Judicial Independence and Human Rights Protection around the World.” Judicature85:195–200.
31.
KeithLinda CampTateC. NealPoeSteven C.2009. “Is the Law a Mere Parchment Barrier to Human Rights Abuse?” The Journal of Politics71 (2): 644–60.
32.
KornhauserLewis A.2002. “Is Judicial Independence a Useful Concept?” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads, edited by BurbankStephen B.FriedmanBarry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 45–54.
33.
LandesWilliamPosnerRichard. 1975. “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective.” Journal of Law and Economics18:875–901.
34.
LinzerDrew A.StatonJeffrey K.2015. “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948-2012.” Journal of Law and Courts3:223–56.
35.
MahoneyJames. 2001. The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
MaravallJose M.2003. “The Rule of Law as a Political Weapon.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by MaravallJose M.PrzeworskiAdam. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–300.
37.
MeltonJamesGinsburg.Tom2014. “Does De Jure Judicial Independence Really Matter?” Journal of Law and Courts2 (2), pp. 187–217.
38.
PosnerEric A.VermeuleAdrian. 2007. Terror in the Balance: Security, Liberty and the Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
PowellEmilia J.StatonJeffrey K.2009. “Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation.” International Studies Quarterly53:149–74.
40.
PowellJonathan M.ThyneClayton. 2011. “Global Instances of Coups from 1950-2010: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research48 (2): 249–59.
41.
RandazzoKirkGiblerDouglas M.ReidRebecca. 2016. “Examining the Development of Judicial Independence.” Political Research Quarterly69 (3): 586–93.
42.
ReganPatrick M.2009. Sixteen Million One: Understanding Civil War. New York: Routledge.
43.
ReganPatrick M.FrankRichard W.ClarkDavid H.2009. “New Datasets on Political Institutions and Elections, 1972—2005.” Conflict Management and Peace Science26 (3): 286–304.
44.
Ríos-FigueroaJulioStatonJeffrey K.2014. “An Evaluation of Cross-national Measures of Judicial Independence.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organizations30 (1): 104–37.
45.
ShapiroMartin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
46.
TurnerKathryn. 1965. “Federalist Policy and the Judiciary Act of 1801.” The William and Mary Quarterly: A Magazine of Early American History22:3–32.
47.
TushnetMark V.2003. “Defending Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime.” Wisconsin Law Review2003:273–307.
48.
U.S.C., 37. 1861. “Confiscation Act.”
49.
U.S.C., 37. 1862. “Judiciary Act.”
50.
U.S.C., 37. 1863. Habeas Corpus Suspension Act.
51.
VanbergGeorg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science45 (2): 346–61.
52.
VanbergGeorg. 2015. “Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Political Science18:167–85.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
