Collective-action problems affect the structure of stakeholder networks differently in policy settings (Berardo and Scholz 2010). However, interactions in policy settings do not usually occur in an institutional vacuum; instead, they are guided and constrained by agreed-on rules. Therefore, to better understand behavior in these settings, it is important to understand the parameters that guide and constrain it. Combining arguments from game theory and social network analysis, this paper focuses on how the nature of collective-action problems affect the design of formal institutional arrangements. The cases are two institutional arrangements for the provision of high-quality drinking water, in New York City and in Boston. The design of these arrangements is measured through Networks of Prescribed Interactions (NPIs), capturing patterns of interactions mandated by formal rules. NPI structures in each case are then compared analyzing their structural measures and applying exponential random graph models (ERGMs). By comparing these NPIs, the paper assesses the effects of collective-action problems on the design of formal institutional arrangements. Results show that cooperation problems are associated with designs prescribing redundant interactions that create a balanced distribution of responsibilities among the key actors to the agreement.
AlcottEmilyAshtonMark S.GentryBradford S., eds. 2013. Natural and Engineered Solutions for Drinking Water Supplies: Lessons from the Northwestern United States and Directions for Global Watershed Management. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
2.
AndersonBrigham S.ButtsCarterCarleyKathleen. 1999. “The Interaction of Size and Density with Graph-Level Indices.” Social Networks21 (3): 239–67.
3.
AndrewSimon. 2010. “Adaptive versus Restrictive Contracts: Can They Resolve Different Risk Problems? In Self-Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action, edited by FeiockRichardScholzJohn T., 91–113. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AndrewSimonCarrJered B.2013. “Mitigating Uncertainty and Risk in Planning for Regional Preparedness: The Role of Bonding and Bridging Relationships.” Urban Studies50 (4): 709–24.
5.
AndrewSimonHawkinsChristopher V.2012. “Regional Cooperation and Multilateral Agreements in the Provision of Public Safety.” The American Review of Public Administration43 (4): 460–75.
6.
AngstMarioHirschiChristian. 2017. “Network Dynamics in Natural Resource Governance: A Case Study of Swiss Landscape Management.” Policy Studies Journal45 (2): 315–36.
7.
BalandJean-MariePlatteauJean-Philippe. 1996. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a role for Rural Communities?New York: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
8.
BasurtoXavierKingsleyGordonMcQueenKellySmithMshadoniWeibleChristopher M.2010. “A Systematic Approach to Institutional Analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s Grammatical Syntax.” Political Research Quarterly63:523–37.
9.
BerardoRamiro. 2014. “The Evolution of Self-Organizing Communication Networks in High-Risk Social-Ecological Systems.” International Journal of the Commons8 (1): 236–58.
10.
BerardoRamiroAlcañizIsabellaHaddenJenniferJasnyLorien. 2016. “Networks and the Politics of the Environment.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, edited by VictorJennifer NicollMontgomeryAlexander H.LubellMark, 611–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
BerardoRamiroScholzJohn T.2010. “Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries.” American Journal of Political Science54 (3): 632–49.
12.
BrownTrevor L.PotoskiMatthew. 2003. “Contract-Management Capacity in Municipal and County Governments.” Public Administration Review63 (2): 156–64.
13.
BrownTrevor L.PotoskiMatthewVan SlykeDavid. 2016. “Managing Complex Contracts: A Theoretical Approach.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory26 (2): 294–308.
14.
BurnettNancy. 2005. Behind the Scenes: The Inside Story of the Watershed Agreement. Margaretville, NY: Catskill Watershed Corporation.
15.
CarrJered B.HawkinsChristopher V.2013. “The Costs of Cooperation: What the Research Tells Us about Managing the Risks of Service Collaborations in the U.S.” State and Local Government Review45 (4): 224–39.
16.
CarterDavid P.WeibleChristopher M.SiddikiSaba N.BasurtoXavier. 2016. “Integrating Core Concepts from the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework for the Systematic Analysis of Policy Designs: An Illustration from the US National Organic Program Regulation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics28 (1): 159–185.
17.
CrawfordSueOstromElinor. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review89 (3): 582–600.
18.
CrawfordSueOstromElinor. 2005. “A Grammar of Institutions.” In Understanding Institutional Diversity, edited by OstromElinor, 137–174. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
FeiockRichard C.LeeIn WonParkHyung Jun. 2012. “Administrators’ and Elected Officials’ Collaboration Networks: Selecting Partners to Reduce Risk in Economic Development.” Special Issue, Public Administration Review72:S58–68.
GalushaDiane. 2016. Liquid Assets: A History of New York City’s Water System. Expanded ed. Fleischmanns, NY: Purple Mountain Press.
25.
HandcockMark S.HunterDavid R.ButtsCarter T.GoodreauSteven M.KrivitskyPavel N.MorrisMartina. 2017. “ergm: Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks.” The Statnet Project. http://www.statnet.org. R package version 3.8.0, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ergm.
26.
HayesAdam L.ScottTyler A.2018. “Multiplex Network Analysis for Complex Governance Systems Using Surveys and Online Behavior.” Policy Studies Journal46 (2): 327–53.
27.
HenryAdam D.2011. “Ideology, Power, and the Structure of Policy Networks.” Policy Studies Journal39 (3): 361–83.
28.
HenryAdam D.VollanBjörn. 2014. “Networks and the Challenge of Sustainable Development.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources39:583–610.
29.
HunterDavid R.HandcockMark S.ButtsCarter T.GoodreauSteven M.MorrisMartina. 2008. “ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks.” Journal of Statistical Software24 (3): 1–29.
30.
LeeYoungmi. 2011. “Economic Development Networks among Local Governments: The Structure of Collaboration Networks in the Tampa Bay Metropolitan Area.” International Review of Public Administration16 (1): 113–34.
31.
LeifeldPhilipSchneiderVolker. 2012. “Information Exchange in Policy Networks.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 731–44.
32.
LusherDeanKoskinenJohanRobinsGarry, eds. 2013. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MaserSteven M.1998. “Constitutions as Relational Contracts: Explaining Procedural Safeguards in Municipal Charters.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8 (4): 527–64.
34.
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority representative. Personal communication. June3, 2016.
35.
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Advisory Board representative. Personal communication. July14, 2016.
MillerGary. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
NessonFern L.1983. Great Waters: A History of Boston’s Water Supply. Hanover, New Hampshire: University Press of New England.
39.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation representative. Personal communication. July12, 2016.
40.
OstromElinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
OstromElinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42.
RobertsChristine L.1990. Conflict and Cooperation in Watershed Management: Case Study of Metropolitan Boston’s Water Supplies. Unpublished Masters in City Planning thesis, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
43.
RobinsGarryPattisonPhilippaKalishYuvalLusherDean. 2007. “An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Social Networks.” Social Networks29 (2): 173–91.
44.
RodriguezMiguelTavaresAntonio F.AraújoJ. Filipe. 2012. “Municipal Service Delivery: The Role of Transaction Costs in the Choice between Alternative Governance Mechanisms.” Local Government Studies38 (5): 615–38.
45.
ScharpfFritz W.1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
46.
ScholzJohn T.BerardoRamiroKyleBrad. 2008. “Do Networks Solve Collective Action Problems? Credibility, Search, and Collaboration.” The Journal of Politics70 (2): 393–406.
47.
SiddikiSabaWeibleChristopher M.BasurtoXavierCalanniJohn. 2011. “Dissecting Policy Designs: An Application of the Institutional Grammar Tool.” Policy Studies Journal39 (1): 79–103.
48.
SiddikiSaba N.KoskiChrisCarboniJulia L.SadiqAbdul-Akeem. 2015. “How Policy Rules Shape the Structure and Performance of Collaborative Governance Arrangements.” Public Administration Review75 (4): 536–547.
49.
SollDavid. 2013. Empire of Water: An Environmental and Political History of the New York City Water Supply. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50.
SteinbergPhillip E.ClarkGeorge E.1999. “Troubled Water? Acquiescence, Conflict, and the Politics of Place in Watershed Management” Political Geography18 (4): 477–508.
51.
Surface Water Treatment Rule, 40 C.F.R §141.71. 1989.
52.
TaylorMichael. 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
YiHongtaoScholzJohn T.2016. “Policy Networks in Complex Governance Subsystems: Observing and Comparing Hyperlink, Media, and Partnership Networks.” Policy Studies Journal44 (3): 248–79.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
