Analyses of television news and major newspapers have led to the critique that “the media” ignore the issues in campaigns, which could explain studies that show limited effects for media coverage on knowledge. These studies overlook great variation in the quantity and quality of news coverage in local information environments. Using data collected from local newspaper websites during the 2012 American presidential election, we show the quality and quantity of local news campaign coverage differ substantially between battleground and nonbattleground states. In an effort to differentiate themselves from other news outlets, newspapers in battleground states play up the local angle (e.g., candidate visits), resulting in less attention to issues in their stories. These findings suggest the voters most important to the election outcome (i.e., those in battleground states) may have less information on candidate issue positions available within their local media market.
AnsolabehereStephenBehrRoy L.IyengarShanto. 1993. The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York: MacMillan.
3.
BenoitWilliam L.SteinKevin A.HansenGlenn J.2005. “New York Times Coverage of Presidential Campaigns.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90 (4): 356–76.
4.
BovitzGregory L.DruckmanJames N.LupiaArthur. 2002. “When Can a News Organization Lead Public Opinion? Ideology versus Market Forces in Decisions to Make News.” Public Choice113 (1–2): 127–55.
5.
BoydstunAmber E.2013. Making the News: Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
BradyHenry E.JohnstonRichard. 1987. “What’s the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, edited by OrrenG. R.PolsbyN. W., 127–186. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
7.
BriansCraig LeonardWattenbergMartin P.1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News and Newspapers.” American Journal of Political Science40 (1): 172–93.
8.
BrohC. Anthony. 1980. “Horse race Journalism: Reporting the Polls in the 1976 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly44 (4): 514–29.
9.
CarrollRaymond L.1992. “Blurring Distinctions: Network and Local News.” In The Future of News, edited by CookP. S.GomeryD.LichtyL. W., 45–51. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
10.
DarrJoshua P.2018. “Reports from the Field: Earned Local Media in Presidential Campaigns.” Presidential Studies Quarterly48(2): 225–247.
11.
DarrJoshua P.LevenduskyMatthew S.2014. “Relying on the Ground Game: The Placement and Effect of Campaign Field Offices.” American Politics Research42 (3): 529–48.
12.
DixonTravis L.2017. “Good Guys Are Still Always in White? Positive Change Continued Misrepresentation of Race Crime on Local Television News.” Communication Research44(6): 775–792.
13.
DixonTravis L.LinzDaniel. 2000. “Overrepresentation and Underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as Lawbreakers on Television News.” Journal of Communication50 (2): 131–54.
14.
DixonTravis L.WilliamsCharlotte L.2015. “The Changing Misrepresentation of Race and Crime on Network and Cable News.” Journal of Communication65 (1): 24–39.
15.
DruckmanJames N.2005. “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication22:463–81.
16.
DruckmanJames N.KiferMartinParkinMichael. 2009. “Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review103:343–66.
17.
DunawayJohanna. 2008. “Markets, Ownership, and the Quality of Campaign News Coverage.” The Journal of Politics70 (4): 1193–202.
18.
DunawayJohannaLawrenceRegina G.2015. “What Predicts the Game Frame? Media Ownership, Electoral Context, and Campaign News.” Political Communication32 (1): 43–60.
19.
EvelandWilliam P.Jr.HivelyMyiah Hutchens. 2009. “Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and ‘Heterogeneity’ of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation.” Journal of Communication59 (2): 205–24.
20.
EvelandWilliam P.Jr.ScheufeleDietram A.2000. “Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation.” Political Communication17 (3): 215–37.
21.
FoxJulia R.KoloenGlorySahinVolkan. 2007. “No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in the Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media51 (2): 213–27.
22.
GerberAlan S.KarlanDeanBergenDaniel. 2009. “Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions.” American Economic Journal1 (2): 35–52.
23.
GimpelJames G.KaufmannKaren M.Pearson-MerkowitzShanna. 2007. “Battleground States versus Blackout States: The Behavioral Implications of Modern Presidential Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics69 (3): 786–97.
24.
GraberDoris. 2003. “The Media and Democracy: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes.” Annual Review of Political Science6 (1): 139–60.
25.
HallinDaniel C.1992. “Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968–1988.” Journal of Communication42 (2): 5–24.
26.
IyengarShantoNorpothHelmutHahnKyu S.2004. “Consumer Demand for Election News: The Horserace Sells.” The Journal of Politics66 (1): 157–75.
27.
JeritJennifer. 2009. “Understanding the Knowledge Gap: The Role of Experts and Journalists.” The Journal of Politics71 (2): 442–56.
28.
JohnsonThomas J.BraimaMahmoud A. M.SothirajahJayanthi. 1999. “Doing the Traditional Media Sidestep: Comparing the Effects of the Internet and Other Nontraditional Media with Traditional Media in the 1996 Presidential Campaign.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly76 (1): 99–123.
29.
JustMarion R.LevineRosalindBeltTodd. 2001. “Thinner, Cheaper, Longer: To Pad Profits, Broadcasters Cut Budgets and Staff While Adding Programs.” Columbia Journalism Review40 (4): 12–13.
30.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1991. “Senate Elections in the News: Examining Campaign Coverage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (3): 349–74.
31.
LawrenceRegina G.2000. “Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News.” Political Communication17 (2): 93–114.
32.
MilitaKerriRyanJohn BarrySimasElizabeth N.2014. “Nothing to Hide, Nowhere to Run, or Nothing to Lose: Candidate Position-Taking in Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior36 (2): 427–49.
33.
MolotchHarveyLesterMarilyn. 1974. “News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals.” American Sociological Review39 (1): 101–12.
34.
MullainathanSendhilShleiferAndrei. 2005. “The Market for News.” American Economic Review95 (4): 1031–53.
35.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2009. “Campaign Dynamics in Battleground and Nonbattleground States.” Public Opinion Quarterly73 (1): 119–29.
36.
PattersonThomas E.1993. Out of Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
37.
PattersonThomas E.McClureRobert D.1976. The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York: Putnam.
38.
PriorMarkus. 2005. “News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 577–92.
39.
RidoutTravis N.FowlerErika FranklinSearlesKathleen. 2012. “Exploring the Validity of Electronic Newspaper Databases.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology15 (6): 451–66.
40.
SearlesKathleenGinnMartha HumphriesNickensJonathan. 2016. “For Whom the Poll Airs: Comparing Poll Results to Television Poll Coverage.” Public Opinion Quarterly80 (4): 943–63.
41.
ShawDaron R.1999. “The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1988–1996.” The Journal of Politics61 (4): 893–913.
42.
ShoemakerPamela J.VosTim P.2009. Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
43.
SigelmanLeeBullockDavid. 1991. “Candidates, Issues, Horse Races, and Hoopla: Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1888–1988.” American Politics Quarterly19 (1): 5–32.
44.
StrömbäckJesperDimitrovaDaniela V.2006. “Political and Media Systems Matter: A Comparison of Election News Coverage in Sweden and the United States.” The International Journal of Press/Politics11 (4): 131–47.
45.
StrömbergDavid. 2008. “How the Electoral College Influences Campaigns and Policy: The Probability of Being Florida.” American Economic Review98 (3): 769–807.
46.
SulkinTracy. 2009. “Campaign Appeals and Legislative Action.” The Journal of Politics71 (3): 1093–108.
47.
TandocEdson C.Jr.VosTim P.2016. “The Journalist Is Marketing the News.” Journalism Practice10 (8): 950–66.
48.
TewksburyDavidWeaverAndrew J.MaddexBrett D.2001. “Accidentally Informed: Incidental News Exposure on the World Wide Web.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78 (3): 533–54.
49.
TrusslerMarcSoroka.Stuart2013. “Consumer Demand for Cynical and Negative News Frames.” Paper prepared for delivery at the annual conference of the Canadian Political Science Association, Victoria, BC (June 4-6).
50.
ValentinoNicholas A.BuhrThomas A.BeckmannMatthew N.2001. “When the Frame Is the Game: Revisiting the Impact of ‘Strategic’ Campaign Coverage on Citizens’ Information Retention.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78 (1): 93–112.
51.
WeaverDavidDrewDan. 1995. “Voter Learning in the 1992 Presidential Election: Did the ‘Nontraditional’ Media and Debates Matter?” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly72 (1): 7–17.
52.
WeaverDavidDrewDan. 2001. “Voter Learning and Interest in the 2000 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter?” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78 (4): 787–98.
53.
WeeksBrianSouthwellBrian. 2010. “The Symbiosis of News Coverage and Aggregate Online Search Behavior: Obama, Rumors, and Presidential Politics.” Mass Communication and Society13 (4): 341–60.
54.
ZhaoXinshuChaffeeSteven H.1995. “Campaign Advertisements versus Television News as Sources of Political Issue Information.” Public Opinion Quarterly59 (1): 41–65.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
