Do development international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) facilitate or destroy the bureaucratic capacity of the states in which they operate? The literature is split on this question. Some scholars argue that development INGOs weaken state capacity by delivering social services that the government is supposed to provide. Others argue that by increasing a country’s domestic demand for improved human rights, development INGOs improve a government’s capacity to fulfill them. In this paper, we show that the effect of development INGOs on state capacity depends on whether a state is democratic or nondemocratic. In our cross-sectional time-series analysis, we find that development INGO presence has a significant positive relationship with state capacity in democracies but no relationship with state capacity in nondemocratic states. These findings help explain the inconsistent claims in the existing INGO literature and are also relevant for development INGOs and the policymakers that support them.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.2011. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data.” Annual Review of Political Science14:331–52.
2.
BesleyTimothyPerssonTorsten. 2007. “The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics.” Working Paper No. 13028, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
3.
BesleyTimothyPerssonTorsten. 2009. “The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics.” American Economic Review99:1218–44.
4.
BesleyTimothyPerssonTorsten. 2010. “State Capacity, Conflict, and Development.” Econometrica78:1–34.
5.
BhattacharyaSambitHodlerRoland. 2010. “Natural Resources, Democracy and Corruption.” European Economic Review54:608–21.
6.
BodeaCristinaLeBasAdrienne. 2016. “The Origins of Voluntary Compliance: Attitudes toward Taxation in Urban Nigeria.” British Journal of Political Science46 (1): 215–38.
7.
BrattonMichael. 1989. “The Politics of Government-NGO Relations in Africa.” World Development17 (4): 569–87.
8.
Bueno de MesquitaBruce BuenoSmithAlistair . 2011. The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics. New York: PublicAffairs.
9.
Bueno de MesquitaBruce BuenoSmithAlistairSiversonRandolph M.MorrowJames D.2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
10.
BukenyaBadru.2013. “Are Service-Delivery NGOs Building State Capacity in the Global South? Experiences from HIV/AIDS Programmes in Rural Uganda.” Effective States and Inclusive Development, Manchester.
11.
BurnsideCraigDollarDavid. 2008. “Aid, Policies, and Growth.” American Economic Review90 (4): 847–68.
12.
BushSarah. 2015. The Taming of Democracy Assistance: Why Democracy Promotion Does Not Confront Dictators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Care International. 2014. The Care International Advocacy Handbook. Geneva: Care International Secretariat.
15.
CarothersThomasBrenchenmacherSaskia. 2014. Closing Space: Democracy and Human Rights Support under Fire. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
16.
CheibubJosé AntonioGandhiJenniferVreelandJames Raymond. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143 (1–2): 67–101.
17.
ClarkJohn. 1992. “Democratising Development: NGOs and the State.” Development in Practice2 (3): 151–62.
18.
CooleyAlexander. 2015. “Countering Democratic Norms.” Journal of Democracy26 (3): 49–63.
19.
CooleyAlexanderRonJames. 2002. “The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action.” International Security27 (1): 5–39.
20.
CornwallAndreaNyamu-MusembiCelestine. 2004. “Putting the ‘Rights-Based Approach’ to Development into Perspective.” Third World Quarterly25 (8): 1415–37.
21.
CoyneChristopher. 2013. Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
22.
De BoefSuzannaKeeleLuke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 184–200.
23.
de WaalAlexander. 1997. Famine Crimes: Politics & the Disaster Relief Industry in Africa. London: African Rights & the International African Institute in Association with James Currey, Oxford & Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
EnglehartNeil A.2009. “State Capacity, State Failure, and Human Rights.” Journal of Peace Research46 (2): 163–80.
27.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization52 (4): 887–917.
28.
FowlerAlan. 1991. “The Role of NGOs in Changing State-Society Relations: Perspectives from Eastern and Southern Africa.” Development Policy Review9:53–84.
29.
FrantzEricaKendall-TaylorAndrea. 2014. “A dictator’s toolkit: Understanding how co-optation affects repression in autocracies.” Journal of Peace Research51 (3): 332–346.
30.
GandhiJenniferPrzeworskiAdam. 2007. “Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies40 (11): 1279–1301.
31.
GulbrandsenLars H.AndresenSteinar. 2004. “NGO Influence in the Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Compliance, Flexibility Mechanisms, and Sinks.” Global Environmental Politics4 (4): 54–75.
32.
HallJohn A.SchroederRalph. 2006. An Anatomy of Power: The Social Theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HaymanRachel. 2016. “Unpacking Civil Society Sustainability: Looking Back, Broader, Deeper, Forward.” Development in Practice26 (5): 670–80.
34.
HendrixCullen S.2010. “Measuring State Capacity: Theoretical and Empirical Implications for the Study of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research47 (3): 273–85.
35.
HendrixCullen S.WongWendy H.2013. “When is the pen truly mighty? Regime type and the efficacy of naming and shaming in curbing human rights abuses.” British Journal of Political Science43 (3): 651–72.
36.
HeurlinChristopher. 2010. “Governing Civil Society: The Political Logic of NGO-State Relations under Dictatorship.” Voluntas21 (2): 220–39.
KeckMargaret E.SikkinkKathryn. 1999. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” International Social Science Journal51 (159): 89–101.
44.
KindornayShannonRonJamesCarpenterCharli. 2012. “Rights-Based Approaches to Development: Implications for NGOs.” Human Rights Quarterly34 (2): 472–506.
45.
KnackStephen.2000. “Aid Dependence and the Quality of Governance: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis.” Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 2396, The World Bank, Washington.
46.
KnackStephen. 2014. “Building or Bypassing Recipient Country Systems: Are Donors Defying the Paris Declaration?” The Journal of Development Studies50 (6): 839–54.
47.
KosackStephen. 2003. “Effective Aid: How Democracy Allows Development Aid to Improve the Quality of Life.” World Development31 (1): 1–22.
48.
LakeDavid A.BaumMatthew A.2001. “The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services.” Comparative Political Studies34 (6): 587–621.
49.
La PortaRafaelLopez-de-SilanesFlorencioShleiferAndreiVishnyRobert. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization15 (1): 222–79.
50.
LevitskyStevenWayLucan A. . 2010. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51.
MannMichael. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology25 (02): 185–213.
52.
MannMichael. 2012. The Sources of Social Power. Volume 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760-1914. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MukhopadhyayDipali. 2014. Warlords, Strongman Governors, and the State in Afghanistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
MurdieAmanda. 2014. Help or Harm: The Human Security Effects of International NGOs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
58.
MurdieAmandaHicksAlexander. 2013. “Can International NGOs Boost Government Services: The Case of Health.” International Organization67 (3): 541–74.
59.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development–DAC. 2007. “The Fragile States Principles (FSPs).” In Principles for Fragile States and Situations. http://www.oecd.org/dacfragilestates/.
PemsteinDanielMeserveStephen A.MeltonJames. 2010. “Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type.” Political Analysis18 (4): 426–49.
62.
RaustialaKal. 1997. “States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions.” International Studies Quarterly41 (4): 719–40.
63.
ReimannKim D.2006. “A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs.” International Studies Quarterly50 (1): 45–67.
64.
RisseThomasRoppStephen C.SikkinkKathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SavoiaAntonioSenKunal. 2014. “Measurement, Evolution, Determinants, and Consequences of State Capacity: A Review of Recent Research.” Journal of Economic Surveys29 (3): 441–58.
67.
SmithJackieWiestDawn. 2005. “The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association.” Social Forces84 (2): 621–52.
68.
SmithJackieWiestDawn. 2012. Social Movements in the World System: The Politics of Crisis and Transformation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
TierneyMichael J.NielsonDaniel L.HawkinsDarren G.RobertsJ. TimmonsFindleyMichael G.PowersRyan M.ParksBradleyWilsonSven E.HicksRobert L.2011. “More Dollars than Sense: Refining Our Knowledge of Development Finance Using AidData.” World Development39 (11): 1891–1906.
75.
UllebergInger. 2009. The Role and Impact of NGOs in Capacity Development: From Replacing the State to Reinvigorating Education. Paris: UNESCO.
76.
Union of International Associations. 2013/2014. Yearbook of International Organizations. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
UvinPeter. 2004. Human Rights and Development. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
79.
UvinPeter. 2007. “From the Right to Development to the Rights-Based Approach: How ‘Human Rights’ Entered Development.” Development in Practice17 (4/5): 597–606.
80.
WilliamsLaron K.WhittenGuy D.2012. “But Wait, There’s More! Maximizing Substantive Inferences from TSCS Models.” The Journal of Politics74 (3): 685–93.
81.
ZanottiLaura. 2010. “Cacophonies of Aid, Failed State Building and NGOs in Haiti: Setting the Stage for Disaster, Envisioning the Future.” Third World Quarterly31 (5): 755–71.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
