Is a federal prosecutor’s decision whether to pursue violent crime charges political? While prosecutors frequently assert their decision-making independence, their selection and operational constraints suggest a very different story. We assess whether political factors related to the prosecution priorities of the president, Congress, and the local public affect federal prosecutors’ decisions to pursue or decline charges in violent crime matters. To empirically examine this, we utilize data from 89 U.S. Attorneys offices from 1996 to 2011. The results provide rich new insight into when and why federal prosecutors’ decisions to pursue or decline prosecutions are driven by the preferences of the president, Congress, and the local public. The findings also have important broader implications for the role of political factors in a U.S. criminal justice system believed by many to be in crisis.
BawnKathleen. 1995. “Political Control versus Expertise: Congressional Choices about Administrative Procedures.” American Political Science Review89:62–73.
3.
BeneshSara C.MartinekWendy L. 2002. “State Supreme Court Decision Making in Confession Cases.” Justice System Journal23:109–34.
BoydChristina L.2015. “The Hierarchical Influence of Courts of Appeals on District Courts.” Journal of Legal Studies44:113–41.
7.
BoydChristina L.2017. “Gatekeeping and Filtering in Trial Courts.” In The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior, edited by EpsteinLeeStefanieA. Lindquist, pp. 129–48. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
CarpenterDaniel P.1996. “Adaptive Signal Processing, Hierarchy, and Budgetary Control in Federal Regulation.” American Political Science Review90:283–302.
10.
CarpenterDaniel P.KrauseGeorge A. 2012. “Reputation and Public Administration.” Public Administration Review72:26–32.
EdwardsGeorge C.III.WoodB Dan. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.” American Political Science Review93 (2): 327–44.
13.
EisensteinJames. 1978. Counsel for the United States: U.S. Attorneys in the Political and Legal Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
EpsteinDavidO’HalloranSharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
EpsteinLeeKnightJack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
16.
EpsteinLeeKobylkaJoseph F. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
17.
EpsteinLeeMartinAndrew D.SegalJeffrey A.WesterlandChad. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization23 (2): 303–25.
18.
EpsteinLeeWalkerThomas G.DixonWilliam J. 1989. “The Supreme Court and Criminal Justice Disputes: A Neo-Institutional Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science33:825–41.
19.
Eshbaugh-SohaMatthew. 2008. “The Impact of Presidential Speeches on the Bureaucracy.” Social Science Quarterly89:116–32.
FerejohnJohnShipanCharles. 1989. “Congressional Influence on Administrative Agencies: A Case Study of Telecommunications Policy.” In Congress Reconsidered, edited by DoddLawrence C.OppenheimerBruce I., 4th ed., 393–410. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
22.
GeorgeTracey E.2001. “Court Fixing.” Arizona Law Review43:9–62.
23.
GeorgeTracey E.YoonAlbert H. 2003. “The Federal Court System: A Principal-Agent Perspective.” St. Louis University Law Journal47:819–834.
24.
GibsonJames L.1978. “Race as a Determinant of Criminal Sentences: A Methodological Critique and a Case Study.” Law & Society Review12:455–78.
25.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J. 2016. “From Ferguson’s Streets to Washington’s Marble Arches: Experiences with Legal Authorities, Group Identities, and African American Perceptions of Legal Legitimacy.” Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=2753194.
26.
GilesMicheal W.HettingerVirginia A.PeppersTodd. 2001. “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas.” Political Research Quarterly54 (3): 623–41.
27.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2013. “Prosecutorial Discretion under Resource Constraints: Budget Allocations and Local Death-Charging Decisions.” Judicature96:161–68.
28.
GoldmanAdam. 2016. “Justice Department Grants Immunity to Staffer Who Set Up Clinton Email Server.” Chicago Tribune, March2.
29.
GordonSanford C.HuberGregory A. 2002. “Citizen Oversight and the Electoral Incentives of Criminal Prosecutors.” American Journal of Political Science46 (2): 334–51.
30.
GreenFrank. 2017. “In Richmond, Attorney General Jeff Sessions says He Will Expand Project Exile Nationwide.” Richmond Times-Dispatch, March15.
31.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.2002. “Regulating Hate: State and Local Influences on Hate Crime Law Enforcement.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly2:126–60.
32.
HettingerVirginia A.LindquistStefanie A.MartinekWendy L. 2004. “Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science48 (1): 123–37.
33.
HettingerVirginia A.LindquistStefanie A.MartinekWendy L. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
34.
HolmesLisa M.2007. “Presidential Strategy in the Judicial Appointment Process: ‘Going Public’ in Support of Nominees to the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Politics Research35:567–94.
35.
HowardRobert M.ChardRichard E.KajiJoel T.DavisJeffrey. 2000. “Pre-trial Bargaining and Litigation: The Search for Fairness and Efficiency.” Law & Society Review34:431–56.
36.
HurwitzJonPeffleyMark. 2005. “Explaining the Great Racial Divide: Perceptions of Fairness in the U.S. Criminal Justice System.” Journal of Politics67:762–83.
37.
KernellSamuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. 3rd ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
38.
KiewietD. RoderickMcCubbinsMathews D. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
KrauseGeorge A.2009. “Organizational Complexity and Coordination Dilemmas in U.S. Executive Politics.” Presidential Studies Quarterly39:74–88.
40.
LewisDavid E.2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
LochnerTodd. 2002. “Strategic Behavior and Prosecutorial Agenda-Setting in United States Attorneys’ Offices: The Role of U.S. Attorneys and Their Assistants.” Justice System Journal23:271–94.
42.
MacDonaldJason A.2013. “Congressional Power over Executive Branch Policy Making: Limitations on Bureaucratic Regulations, 1989-2009.” Presidential Studies Quarterly43:523–37.
43.
MaorMoshe. 2010. “Organizational Reputation and Jurisdictional Claims: The Case of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions23:133–59.
44.
MatherKate. 2016. “L.A. Police Chief Beck Backs Charges against Officer Who Fatally Shot Venice Homeless Man.” Los Angeles Times, January11.
45.
McCarthyJustin. 2015. “More Americans Say Crime Is Rising in U.S.” Gallup, October22.
46.
McCubbinsMathew D.NollRoger G.WeingastBarry R. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization3:243–77.
47.
MillerGary J.2000. “Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration, Theory, and Practice10:289–327.
48.
MillerGary J.2005. “The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Model.” Annual Review of Political Science8:203–25.
49.
MillerGary J.MoeTerry M.. 1986. “The Positive Theory of Hierarchies.” In Political Science: The Science of Politics, edited by WeisbergHerbert F., 167–200. New York: Agathon Press.
50.
MoeTerry M.1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of Political Science28:739–77.
51.
NelsonMichael J.2014. “Representative Justice? Public Opinion and the Criminal Justice System.” Journal of Law and Courts2:117–52.
52.
NelsonMichael J.OstranderIan. 2016. “Keeping Appointments: The Politics of Con-Firming United States Attorneys.” Justice System Journal37:211–31.
53.
NixonRichard.1968. “Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Miami Beach, Florida.” From The American Presidency Project, August8.
54.
OliverWillard M.2003. The Law and Order Presidency. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
55.
OliverWillard M.MarionNancy E.HillJoshua B. 2016. “Not All Crime Policies are Created Equal: Presidential Speeches and Symbolic Rhetoric by Crime Policy Types.” Criminal Justice Policy Review27:331–47.
56.
OlsonMary K.1995. “Regulatory Agency Discretion among Competing Industries: Inside the FDA.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization11:379–405.
57.
O’NeillMichael Edmund. 2003. “When Prosecutors Don’t: Trends in Federal Prosecutorial Declinations.” Notre Dame Law Review79:221–90.
58.
PeffleyMarkHurwitzJon. 2010. Justice in America: The Separate Realities of Blacks and Whites. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
PeppersTodd C.2006. Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of the Supreme Court Law Clerk. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
60.
PerryH. W.Jr.1998. “United States Attorneys—Whom Shall They Serve?” Law and Contemporary Problems61:129–48.
RandazzoKirk A.2008. “Strategic Anticipation and the Hierarchy of Justice in U.S. District Courts.” American Politics Research36:669–93.
63.
RichardsonRichard J.VinesKenneth N. 1967. “Review, Dissent, and the Appellate Process: A Political Interpretation.” Journal of Politics29:597–616.
64.
RingquistEvan J.1995. “Political Control and Policy Impact in EPA’s Office of Water Quality.” American Journal of Political Science39:336–63.
65.
RocqueMichael. 2011. “Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System and Perceptions of Legitimacy: A Theoretical Linkage.” Race and Justice1:292–315.
66.
ScottKevin M.2006. “Understanding Judicial Hierarchy: Reversals and the Behavior of Intermediate Appellate Judges.” Law & Society Review40:163–92.
SeymourWhitney North.Jr.1975. United States Attorney. New York: William Marrow.
69.
ShipanCharles R.2004. “Regulatory Regimes, Agency Action, and the Conditional Nature of Congressional Influence.” American Political Science Review98 (3): 467–80.
70.
SteigerwaltAmy. 2010. Battle over the Bench: Senators, Interest Groups and Lower Court Confirmations. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
71.
SteigerwaltAmyMartinekWendy. 2017. “Lower Federal Court Confirmations: Motivations and Strategies.” In Handbook of Judicial Politics, edited by HowardRobertRandazzo, 321-339Kirk. New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
TalbertJeffrey C.JonesBryan D.BaumgartnerFrank R. 1995. “Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science39:383–405.
73.
TiedeLydia Brashear. 2009. “The Impact of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Reform: A Comparative Analysis.” Justice System Journal30:34–39.
74.
TrumpDonald J.2016. “Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio.” From The American Presidency Project, July21. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=117935
van HoutenPieter. 2009. “Multi-level Relations in Political Parties.” Party Politics15 (2): 137–56.
80.
WeingastBarry R.MoranMark J. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control: Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” The Journal of Political Economy91:765–800.
81.
WhitfordAndrew B.2002. “Decentralization and Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” Journal of Theoretical Politics14:167–93.
82.
WhitfordAndrew B.YatesJeff. 2003. “Policy Signals and Executive Governance: Presidential Rhetoric in the ‘War on Drugs.’” Journal of Politics65:995–1012.
83.
WhitfordAndrew B.YatesJeff. 2009. Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda: Constructing the War on Drugs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
84.
WoodB. Dan. 1988. “Principals, Bureaucrats, and Responsiveness in Clean Air Enforcements.” American Political Science Review82:213–34.
85.
WoodB. DanWatermanRichard W. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review85 (3): 801–28.
86.
ZapotoskyMatt. 2017. “In Executive Actions, President Trump Vows Crackdown on Violent Crime. Is American as Unsafe as He Thinks?” The Washington Post, February9.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
