This paper introduces a new perspective into the literature on judicial legitimacy by examining the incentives for courts to cater to a popular majority and offering a novel model of legitimacy that has consequences for judicial responsiveness. The account integrates into the literature classic research on how strategic social groups shape public opinion. I theorize that citizens use their perceptions of the judiciary’s support for various social groups as a means to assess the institution overall. From this insight, I derive specific expectations about the conditions under which the Supreme Court’s protection of minority groups like gays and immigrants can damage its legitimacy. Using national survey data, I demonstrate that dislike for the beneficiaries of recent Court rulings systematically diminishes the institution’s legitimacy. The influence of these group-based considerations shapes individual-level attitude change and can be observed at various points in time.
ArceneauxKevinKolodnyRobin. 2009. “Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 755–70.
2.
BanksAntoine J.HicksHeather M.2015. “Fear and Implicit Racism: Whites’ Support for Voter ID Laws.” Political Psychology37 (5): 641–58.
3.
BanksAntoine J.ValentinoNicholas. 2012. “Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science56 (2): 286–97.
4.
BartelsBrandon L.JohnstonChristopher D.2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science57 (1): 184–99.
5.
BaumeisterRoy F.BratslavskyEllenFinkenauerCatrinVohsKathleen D.2001. “Bad Is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology5 (4): 323–70.
6.
BlackRyan C.OwensRyan J.WedekingJustinWohlfarthPatrick C.2016. “The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity.” Law & Society Review50 (3): 703–32.
7.
BraderTedValentinoNicholas A.SuhayElizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 959–78.
8.
BradyHenry E.SnidermanPaul M.1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review79 (4): 1061–78.
9.
CaldeiraGregory A.GibsonJames L.1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science36 (3): 635–64.
10.
ChristensonDino P.GlickDavid M.2015. “Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science59 (2): 403–18.
11.
ClarkTom S.StatonJeffrey K.WangYuAgichteinEugene. Forthcoming. “Using Twitter to Study Public Discourse in the Wake of Judicial Decisions: Public Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Decisions.” Journal of Law & Courts.
12.
CohenGeoffrey L.2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85 (5): 808–22.
13.
CollinsTodd A.CooperChristopher A.2012. “Case Salience and Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decisions: Toward a New Measure.” Political Research Quarterly65 (2): 396–407.
14.
ConoverPamela Johnston. 1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science18 (1): 51–76.
15.
ConversePhilip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by ApterDavid, 206–61. New York: Free Press.
16.
EastonDavid. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
17.
EastonDavid. 1975. “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science5 (4): 435–57.
18.
EdwardsHarry T.1991. “The Judicial Function and the Elusive Goal of Principled Decisionmaking.” Wisconsin Law Review5 (1): 837–65.
19.
EpsteinLeeParkerChristopher M.SegalJeffrey A.2013. “Do Justices Defend Speech They Hate? In-Group Bias, Opportunism, and the First Amendment.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 6. http://epstein.wustl.edu/research/InGroupBias.pdf.
20.
FeldmanStanleyStennerKaren. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology18 (4): 741–70.
21.
FlemmingRoy B.BohteJohnWoodB. Dan. 1997. “One Voice among Many: The Supreme Court’s Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States, 1947–92.” American Journal of Political Science41 (4): 1224–50.
22.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.1992. “Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support.” Journal of Politics54 (4): 1120–45.
23.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.2009. “Knowing the Supreme Court: A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics71 (2): 429–49.
24.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.SpenceLester Kenyatta. 2003a. “Measuring Attitudes towards the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 354–67.
25.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.SpenceLester Kenyatta. 2003b. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science33 (4): 535–56.
26.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J.2014. “The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science10:201–19.
27.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J.2015. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?” American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 1–13.
28.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J.2016a. “Change in Institutional Support for the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court’s Legitimacy Imperiled by the Decisions It Makes?” Public Opinion Quarterly80 (3): 622–41.
29.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J.2016b. “From Ferguson’s Streets to Washington’s Marble Arches: Experiences with Legal Authorities, Group Identities, and African American Perceptions of Legal Legitimacy.” Working paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2753194.
30.
GibsonJames L.PereiraMiguel M.ZeiglerJeffrey. Forthcoming. “Updating Supreme Court Legitimacy: Testing the ‘Rule, Learn, Update’ Model of Political Communication.” American Politics Research.
31.
GilesMicheal W.EvansArthur S.1985. “External Threat, Perceived Threat, and Group Identity.” Social Science Quarterly66 (1): 50–66.
32.
GreenDonald P.PalmquistBradleySchicklerEric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
IyengarShantoSoodGuaravLelkesYphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly76 (3): 405–31.
34.
JardinaAshley E.2014. “Demise of Dominance: Group Threat and the New Relevance of White Identity for American Politics.” PhD diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
35.
JohnstonChristopher D.BartelsBrandon L.2010. “Sensationalism and Sobriety: Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes toward American Courts.” Public Opinion Quarterly74 (2): 260–85.
36.
JohnstonChristopher D.HillygusD. SunshineBartelsBrandon L.2014. “Ideology, the Affordable Care Act Ruling, and Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Public Opinion Quarterly78 (4): 963–73.
37.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 341–55.
38.
LauRichard R.1985. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science29 (1): 119–38.
39.
LupiaArthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review88 (1): 63–76.
40.
NadlerJaniceDiamondShari SeidmanPattonMatthew M.2008. “Government Takings of Private Property.” In Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy, edited by PersilyNathanielCitrinJackEganPatrick J., 286–309. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
NelsonThomas E.KinderDonald R.1996. “Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics58 (4): 1055–78.
42.
O’CallaghanJeromeDukesJames O.1992. “Media Coverage of the Supreme Court’s Caseload.” Journalism Quarterly69 (1): 195–203.
43.
PopkinSamuel L.1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
SlotnickEliot E.1991. “Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decision Making: Problems and Prospects.” Judicature75 (3): 128–42.
45.
SmithSteven S.2013. “The American Panel Survey.” Weidenbaum Center, Washington University in St. Louis. taps.wustl.edu.
46.
SnidermanPaul M.BrodyRichard A.TetlockPhillip E.1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedJardinaAshley E.2013. “Immigration Opposition among U.S. Whites: General Ethnocentrism or Media Priming of Attitudes about Latinos?” Political Psychology34 (2): 149–66.
48.
ValentinoNicholas A.HutchingsVincent L.WhiteIsmail K.2002. “Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns.” American Political Science Review96 (1): 75–90.
49.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
ZilisMichael A.2015. The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
