We present a parsimonious framework for understanding contextual variation in legislative nonresponse. We argue that legislators’ propensity to vote is a function of their willingness and ability to be physically present in the chamber and determine the best position to take on a given proposal. From this framework, we derive four hypotheses regarding the compensation legislators receive, their opportunity to pursue work outside of the chamber, and their informational resources. Analyzing data on over seven million voting opportunities across two sessions in ninety-nine chambers, we find robust evidence that longer legislative sessions decrease nonresponse and that informational resources increase nonresponse, but no evidence that compensation influences nonresponse.
AldrichJohn H.BattistaJames S. Coleman. 2002. “Conditional Party Government in the States.” American Journal of Political Science46:164–72.
2.
AldrichJohn H.RohdeDavid W.2000. “The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, edited by BondJon R.FleisherRichard, 31–72. Washington, DC: CQ Press College.
3.
AnziaSarah F.JackmanMolly C.2013. “Legislative Organization and the Second Face of Power: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics75 (1): 210–24.
4.
BerryWilliam D.BerkmanMichael B.SchneidermanStuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries.” American Political Science Review94 (4): 859–74.
5.
BowenDaniel C.GreeneZachary. 2014. “Should We Measure Professionalism with an Index? A Note on Theory and Practice in State Legislative Professionalism Research.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly14 (3): 277–96.
6.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections.” The Journal of Politics62 (3): 671–700.
7.
CarrollRoyceEichorstJason. 2013. “The Role of Party: The Legislative Consequences of Partisan Electoral Competition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly38 (1): 83–109.
8.
CarsonJamie L.CrespinMichael H.JenkinsJeffery A.Vander WielenRyan J.2004. “Shirking in the Contemporary Congress: A Reappraisal.” Political Analysis12 (2): 176–9.
9.
ClarkJennifer HayesWilliamsR. Lucas. 2013. “Parties, Term Limits, and Representation in the U.S. States.” American Politics Research42 (1): 171–93.
10.
ClarkJennifer HayesOsbornTracyWinburnJonathanWrightGerald C.2009. “Representation in U.S. Legislatures: The Acquisition and Analysis of U.S. State Legislative Roll-Call Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly9 (3): 356–70.
11.
CohenLinda R.NollRoger G.1991. “How to Vote, Whether to Vote: Strategies for Voting and Abstaining on Congressional Roll Calls.” Political Behavior13 (2): 97–127.
12.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
FiorinaMorris P.1994. “Divided Government in the American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism?” American Political Science Review88 (2): 304–16.
14.
FiorinaMorris P.1997. “Professionalism, Realignment, and Representation.” American Political Science Review91 (1): 156–62.
15.
ForgetteRichardSalaBrian R.1999. “Conditional Party Government and Member Turnout on Senate Recorded Votes, 1873–1935.” The Journal of Politics61 (2): 467–84.
16.
FortunatoDavid. 2013. “Majority Status and Variation in Informational Organization.” The Journal of Politics75 (4): 937–52.
17.
GagliarducciStefanoNanniciniTommasoNaticchioniPaolo. 2010. “Moonlighting Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics94 (9): 688–99.
18.
GagliarducciStefanoNanniciniTommasoNaticchioniPaolo. 2011. “Electoral Rules and Politicians’ Behavior: A Micro Test. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy3:144–74.
19.
GammGeraldKousserThad. 2010. “Broad Bills or Particularistic Policy? Historical Patterns in American State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 151–70.
20.
GilliganThomas W.KrehbielKeith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science34 (2): 531–64.
21.
HibbingJohn R.1986. “Ambition in the House: Behavioral Consequences of Higher Office Goals among U.S. Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science30:651–65.
22.
HoffmanMitchellLyonsElizabeth. 2013. “Do Higher Salaries Lead to Higher Performance? Evidence from State Politicians.” Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2345085. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2345085.
23.
HuberJohn D.ShipanCharles R.2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KlarnerCarlBerryWilliamCarseyThomasJewellMalcolmNiemiRichardPowellLyndaSnyderJames. 2013. “State Legislative Election Returns (1967-2010).” Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor.
25.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 148–66.
26.
MaestasCherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25:663–90.
27.
MondakJeffery J.AndersonMary R.2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” The Journal of Politics66 (2): 492–512.
28.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2000. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
RichmanJesse. 2008. “Uncertainty and the Prevalence of Committee Outliers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly33 (2): 323–47.
30.
RosasGuillermoShomerYael. 2008. “Models of Nonresponse in Legislative Politics.” Legislative Studies Quarterly33:573–601.
31.
RothenbergLawrence S.SandersMitchell S.1999. “Rational Abstention and the Congressional Vote Choice.” Economics & Politics11 (3): 311–40.
32.
RothenbergLawrence S.SandersMitchell S.2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science44:316–25.
33.
SanchezLauraThomsonElizabeth. 1997. “Becoming Mothers and Fathers Parenthood, Gender, and the Division of Labor.” Gender & Society11 (6): 747–72.
34.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:69–79.
35.
SquirePeverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (2): 211–27.
36.
Stan Development Team. 2016. “RStanArm: Bayesian Applied Regression Modeling via Stan.” R package version 2.13.1. http://mc-stan.org.
37.
WrightGerald C.2004. “Representation in Americas Legislatures.” SES-0094635 and SES-0242571, National Science Foundation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
38.
WrightGerald C.2007. “Do Term Limits Affect Legislative Roll Call Voting? Representation, Polarization, and Participation.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (3): 256–80.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
