The presence of women justices in the highest constitutional courts varies significantly across countries, yet there is little existing research that engages this substantial cross-national variation. Using an original data set of women’s representation in the constitutional courts in fifty democracies combined with qualitative case studies, we assess the effect of the selection mechanism on this variation and find that the existence of a “sheltered” versus “exposed” selection mechanism is a critical determinant of women’s presence. That is, when the selectors are sheltered from electoral accountability, they are less likely to select women as judges because they do not benefit from credit claiming. When the selectors are exposed and can claim credit, however, the unique traits and visibility of the highest court generate an incentive to appoint women.
AcklandRichard. 2005. “Redressing Balance on Scale of the Justices.”Sydney Morning Herald, September21, 2.
2.
AlozieNicholas O.1990. “Distribution of Women and Minority Judges: The Effects of Judicial Selection Methods.”Social Science Quarterly71 (2): 315–25.
3.
AlozieNicholas O.1996. “Selection Methods and the Recruitment of Women to State Courts of Last Resort.”Social Science Quarterly77 (1): 110–26.
4.
AnasagatsiMiriamWuiameNathalie. 1999. Women and Decision-Making in the Judiciary in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
5.
BakerPeter. 2010. “Kagan Is Sworn in as the Fourth Woman, and 112th Justice, on the Supreme Court.”New York Times, August8, A13.
6.
BakerPeterNagourneyAdam. 2009. “Tight Lid Defined Process in Selecting a New Justice.”New York Times, May28, A1.
7.
BerkeRichard. 1993. “Clinton Picks a ‘Healer’ with Few Detractors for the Supreme Court.”New York Times, June20, sec. 4, 2.
8.
BickersKenneth N.SteinRobert M.1996. “The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel.”American Journal of Political Science40 (4): 1300–26.
9.
BrattonKathleen A.SpillRorie. 2002. “Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of the Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts.”Social Science Quarterly30:115–42.
10.
CameronCharlesCoverAlbertSegalJeffrey. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.”American Political Science Review84:525–34.
11.
CaulMiki. 1999. “Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.”Party Politics5 (1): 79–98.
12.
CaulMiki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis.”The Journal of Politics63 (4): 1214–29.
13.
ChengChristineTavitsMargit. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.”Political Research Quarterly64 (2): 460–71.
14.
CookBeverly Blair. 1980. “Political Culture and the Selection of Women Judges in Trial Courts.” In Women in Local Politics, edited by StewartDebra W., 42–60. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
15.
CrispBrianJensenNathanRosasGuillermoZeitzoffThomas. 2010. “Vote-Seeking Incentives and Investment Environments: The Need for Credit Claiming and the Provision of Protectionism.”Electoral Studies29:221–26.
16.
Davidson-SchmichLeslie. 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Lander 1990–2000.”Party Politics12 (2): 211–32.
17.
DavisSue. 1992. “Do Women Judges Speak ‘In a Different Voice?’ Carol Gilligan, Feminist Legal Theory, and the Ninth Circuit.”Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal8:143–73.
18.
DiascroJennifer SegalSolbergRorie Spill. 2009. “George W. Bush’s Legacy on the Federal Bench: Policy in the Face of Diversity.”Judicature92:289–301.
19.
EpsteinLeeKnightJackShvetsovaOlga. 2001. “Comparing Judicial Selection Systems.”William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal10 (1): 7–36.
20.
Escobar-LemmonMariaTaylor-RobinsonMichelle M.2005. “Women Ministers in Latin American Government: When, Where, and Why?”American Journal of Political Science49:829–44.
21.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.BairdVanessa A.1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.”American Political Science Review92:343–58.
22.
GigerNathalieNelsonMoira. 2010. “The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment: Blame Avoidance or Credit Claiming in the Era of Permanent Austerity?”European Journal of Political Research50:1–23.
23.
GillRebecca D.LazosSylvia R.WatersMallory M.2011. “Are Judicial Performance Evaluations Fair to Women and Minorities? A Cautionary Tale from Clark County, Nevada.”Law & Society Review45:731–59.
24.
GithensMarianne. 1995. “Getting Appointed to the State Court: The Gender Dimension.”Women & Politics15:1–24.
25.
GrimmerJustinMessingSolomonWestwoodSean J.2012. “How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation.”American Journal of Political Science106 (4): 703–19.
26.
HoekstraValerieKittilsonMiki CaulBondElizabeth Andrews. 2014. “Gender, High Courts, and Ideas about Representation in Western Europe.” In Representation: The Case of Women, edited by Escobar-LemmonMariaTaylor-RobinsonMichelle M., 103–117. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
HolmesLisa M.EmreyJolly A.2006. “Court Diversification: Staffing the State Courts of Last Resort through Interim Appointments.”Justice System Journal27 (1): 1–13.
28.
HulseCarl. 2010. “Senate Confirms Kagan in Partisan Vote.”New York Times, August6, A1.
29.
HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew Noble. 2001. “Women and Minorities on State and Federal Appellate Benches, 1985 and 1999.”Judicature85 (2): 84–92.
30.
HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew Noble. 2008. “Diversity in State and Federal Appellate Courts: Change and Continuity across 20 Years.”Justice System Journal29 (1): 47–70.
31.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
IzenbergDan. 2003. “Miriam Na’or, Asher Grunis Selected to Supreme Court.”Jerusalem Post, May23, 1.
33.
IzenbergDan. 2004. “Arbel Named as Justice Despite Protest.”Jerusalem Post, May7, 1.
34.
JensenJennifer M.MartinekWendy L.2009. “The Effects of Race and Gender on the Judicial Ambitions of State Trial Court Judges.”Political Research Quarterly62 (2): 379–92.
35.
KenneySally J.2012. “Choosing Judges: A Bumpy Road to Women’s Equality and a Long Way to Go.”Michigan State Law Review2012:1499–1528.
36.
KenneySally J.2013a. Gender and Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. New York: Routledge.
37.
KenneySally J.2013b. “Which Judicial Selection Systems Generate the Most Women Judges? Lessons from the United States.” In Gender and Judging, edited by SchultzUlrikeShawGisela, 461–80. Portland: Hart Publishing.
38.
KrookMona LenaO’BrienDiana Z.2012. “All the President’s Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.”Journal of Politics74 (3): 840–855.
39.
KunovichSheriPaxtonPamela. 2005. “Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women’s National Political Representation.”American Journal of Sociology111 (2): 505–52.
40.
LabatonStephen. 1993. “Senators See Easy Approval for Nominee.”New York Times, June16, A20.
LinzerDrew A.StatonJeffrey K.2015. “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012.”Journal of Law and Courts3 (2): 223–56.
43.
MartinElainePyleBarry. 2002. “Gender and Racial Diversification of State Supreme Courts.”Women & Politics24 (2): 35–52.
44.
MatlandRichard E.1998. “Women’s Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries.”Legislative Studies Quarterly23 (1): 109–25.
45.
MatlandRichard E.2005. “Enhancing Women’s Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems.” In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, rev. edited by BallingtonJulieKaramAzza, 93–111. Stockholm: International IDEA.
46.
MatlandRichard E.StudlarDonley T.1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.”The Journal of Politics58 (3): 707–33.
47.
MayhewDavid. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
48.
MichelsonEthan. 2013. “Women in the Legal Profession, 1970-2010: A Study of the Global Supply of Lawyers.”Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies20 (2): 1071–1137.
49.
NarishimaYuko. 2008. “On a Roll: From Barrel Girl to High Court Judge.”Sydney Morning Herald, December16, 1.
50.
NorrisPippa. 1985. “Women’s Legislative Participation in Western Europe.”Western European Politics8 (4): 90–101.
51.
NorrisPippa. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
NorrisPippaInglehartRonald. 2001. “Women and Democracy: Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation.”Journal of Democracy12 (3): 126–40.
53.
NorrisPippaLovenduskiJoni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
PaxtonPamelaKunovichSheri. 2003. “Women’s Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.”Social Forces82 (1): 87–113.
55.
PearlmanJonathan. 2007. “Second Woman Judge to Join the Nation’s Top Court.”Sydney Morning Herald, August14, 1.
56.
PellyMichael. 2005. “Ex-teacher, Legal Dynamo and, Oh Yes, a Woman: Welcome to the High Court.”Sydney Morning Herald, September21, 1.
57.
ReddickMaliaNelsonMichael J.CaufieldRachel Paine. 2009. “Racial and Gender Diversity on State Courts: An AJS Study.”The Judges’ Journal48:28–32.
58.
RichterPaul. 1993. “Clinton Picks Moderate Ruth Bader Ginsburg to High Court Judiciary.”Los Angeles Times, June15, A1.
59.
SamuelsDavid J.2002. “Pork Barreling Is Not Credit Claiming or Advertising: Campaign Finance and the Sources of the Personal Vote in Brazil.”The Journal of Politics64 (3): 845–63.
60.
SavageCharlie. 2009. “Senate Confirms Sotomayor for the Supreme Court.”New York Times, August7, A1.
61.
SchultzUlrikeShawGisela. 2013. “Gender and Judging: Overview and Synthesis.” In Gender and Judging, edited by SchultzUlrikeShawGisela, 3–47. Portland: Hart Publishing.
62.
ShortellChristopher. 2013. “Voting in Trial Court Elections: Ballot Roll-Off in Partisan, Non-partisan, and Retention Elections in High-Population Counties.”Justice System Journal34:153–70.
63.
SolbergRorie Spill. 2005. “Diversity and G.W. Bush’s Judicial Appointments: Serving Two Masters.”Judicature88:276–83.
64.
ThamesFrank C.WilliamsMargaret S.2013. Contagious Representation: Women’s Political Representation around the World. New York: New York University Press.
65.
TokarzKaren. 1986. ”Women Judges and Merit Selection Under the Missouri Plan.”Washington University Law Review64 (3): 903–951.
66.
VolkcansekMary. 2009. “Exporting the Missouri Plan: Judicial Appointment Commissions.”Missouri Law Review74 (3): 783–800.
67.
WilliamsMargaret. 2007. “Women’s Representation on State Trial and Appellate Courts.”Social Science Quarterly88 (5): 1192–1204.
68.
WilliamsMargaret. 2008. “Ambition, Gender, and the Judiciary.”Political Research Quarterly61 (1): 68–78.
69.
WilliamsMargaretThamesFrank C.2008. “Women’s Representation on High Courts in Advanced Industrialized Countries.”Politics & Gender4:451–71.
ZelenyJeffHulseCarl. 2010. “Democrats Express Praise; Republicans Are Cautious.”New York Times, May11, A16.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
