This paper analyzes the effects of biases in economic information on partisans’ economic perceptions. In survey experiments, I manipulate the presence of partisan cues and the direction of proattitudinal information in news stories about the American economy. Results demonstrate that although proattitudinal tone in factual economic news stories most strongly affects partisans’ economic perceptions, inclusion of partisan cues alongside proattitudinal information results in weaker shifts in economic sentiment relative to stories lacking partisan content. These findings suggest that the relatively subtle process of agenda setting in economic news may be the most effective tool used by partisan news outlets to drive polarization in citizens’ factual economic perceptions.
AdaySean. 2010. “Chasing the Bad News: An Analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan War Coverage on NBC and Fox News Channel.” Journal of Communication60 (1): 144–64.
2.
AltJames E.LassenDavid D.MarshallJohn. 2016. “Credible Sources and Sophisticated Voters: When Does New Information Induce Economic Voting?The Journal of Politics78 (2): 327-42.
3.
BartelsLarry M.2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior24 (2): 117–50.
4.
BartelsLarry M.2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics3 (1): 15–31.
5.
BisgaardMartin. 2015. “Bias Will Find a Way: Economic Perceptions, Attributions of Blame, and Partisan-Motivated Reasoning during Crisis.” The Journal of Politics77 (3): 849–60.
6.
BloodDeborah J.PhillipsPeter C. B.1995. “Recession Headline News, Consumer Sentiment, the State of the Economy and Presidential Popularity: A Time Series Analysis 1989–1993.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research7 (1): 2–22.
7.
BolsenTobyDruckmanJames N.CookFay Lomax. 2014. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior36 (2): 235–62.
8.
BoudreauCherylMacKenzieScott A.2014. “Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 48–62.
9.
BroomeAndre. 2006. “Setting the Fiscal Policy Agenda: Economic News and Election Year Tax Debates in New Zealand.” Law in Context24 (2): 60–77.
10.
BullockJohn G.GerberAlan S.HillSeth J.HuberGregory A.2015. “Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science10 (4): 519–78.
11.
ClarkJason K.WegenerDuane T.FabrigarLeandre R.2008. “Attitudinal Ambivalence and Message-Based Persuasion: Motivated Processing of Proattitudinal Information and Avoidance of Counterattitudinal Information.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34 (4): 565–77.
12.
D’AlessioDaveAllenMike. 2000. “Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Communication50 (4): 133–56.
13.
EvansGeoffreyAndersenRobert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” The Journal of Politics68 (1): 194–207.
14.
EvansGeoffreyPickupMark. 2010. “Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle.” The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1236–51.
15.
FogartyBrian J.2005. “Determining Economic News Coverage.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research17 (2): 149–72.
16.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica78 (1): 35–71.
17.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.2010. “Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments.” American Journal of Political Science54 (1): 153–73.
18.
GrabeMaria ElizabethLangAnnieZhaoXiaoquan. 2003. “News Content and Form Implications for Memory and Audience Evaluations.” Communication Research30 (4): 387–413.
19.
GroelingTim. 2013. “Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News.” Political Science16 (1): 129–51.
20.
GroelingTimKernellSamuel. 1998. “Is Network News Coverage of the President Biased?The Journal of Politics60 (4): 1063–87.
21.
HannitySean. 2012. Fox Hannity. Television broadcast by Fox News Channel, October5.
22.
HealyAndrewMalhotraNeil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science16:285–306.
23.
HetheringtonMarc J.1996. “The Media’s Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science40 (2): 372–95.
24.
HibbingJohn R.SmithKevin B.AlfordJohn R.2014. “Differences in Negativity Bias Underlie Variations in Political Ideology.” Behavioral & Brain Sciences37 (03): 297–307.
25.
HumeEllen. 1996. “The New Paradigm for News.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546:141–53.
26.
ItoTiffany A.LarsenJeff T.SmithN. KyleCacioppoJohn T.1998. “Negative Information Weighs More Heavily on the Brain: The Negativity Bias in Evaluative Categorizations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75 (4): 887–900.
27.
JeritJenniferBarabasJason. 2012. “Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment.” The Journal of Politics74 (3): 672–84.
28.
KleinnijenhuisJanRietbergEwald M.1995. “Parties, Media, the Public and the Economy: Patterns of Societal Agenda-Setting.” European Journal of Political Research28 (1): 95–118.
29.
LarcineseValentinoPuglisiRiccardoSnyderJames M.Jr.2011. “Partisan Bias in Economic News: Evidence on the Agenda-Setting Behavior of U.S. Newspapers.” Journal of Public Economics95 (9): 1178–89.
30.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science3 (1): 183–219.
31.
MacKuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.StimsonJames A.1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” The American Political Science Review86 (3): 597–611.
32.
MindichDavid T. Z.2000. Just the Facts: How Objectivity Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.
33.
MondakJeffery J.1993. “Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues.” Political Behavior15 (2): 167–92.
34.
MutzDiana C.1992. “Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience.” American Journal of Political Science36:483–508.
35.
NadeauRichardNiemiRichard G.AmatoTimothy. 2000. “Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Expectations, and Voting Intentions in Great Britain.” European Journal of Political Research38 (1): 135–70.
36.
NadeauRichardNiemiRichard G.FanDavid P.AmatoTimothy. 1999. “Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval.” The Journal of Politics61 (1): 109–35.
37.
NicholsonStephen P.2011. “Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence.” The Journal of Politics73 (4): 1165–77.
38.
NicholsonStephen P.2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 52–66.
39.
PattersonThomas E.DonsbaghWolfgang. 1996. “News Decisions: Journalists as Partisan Actors.” Political Communication13 (4): 455–68.
40.
PeffleyMark. 1984. “The Voter as Juror: Attributing Responsibility for Economic Conditions.” Political Behavior6 (3): 275–94.
41.
PetersenMichael BangSkovMartinSerritzlewSørenRamsøyThomas. 2013. “Motivated Reasoning and Political Parties: Evidence for Increased Processing in the Face of Party Cues.” Political Behavior35 (4): 831–54.
42.
PetrocikJohn Richard. 2009. “Measuring Party Support: Leaners Are Not Independents.” Electoral Studies28 (4): 562–72.
43.
PriorMarkus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
PriorMarkusSoodGauravKhannaKabir. 2015. “You Cannot Be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science10 (4): 489–518.
45.
RedlawskDavid P.2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics64 (4): 1021–44.
46.
RudolphThomas J.2003. “Who’s Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions.” American Journal of Political Science47 (4): 698–713.
47.
SandersDavidGavinNeil. 2004. “Television News, Economic Perceptions and Political Preferences in Britain, 1997–2001.” The Journal of Politics66 (4): 1245–66.
48.
ShahDhavan V.WattsMark D.DomkeDavidFanDavid P.FibisonMichael. 1999. “News Coverage, Economic Cues, and the Public’s Presidential Preferences, 1984–1996.” The Journal of Politics61 (4): 914–43.
49.
SimonovitsGabor. 2015. “An Experimental Approach to Economic Voting.” Political Behavior37 (4): 977–94.
50.
SorokaStuart N.2006. “Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information.” The Journal of Politics68 (2): 372–85.
51.
SorokaStuart N.2012. “The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World.” The Journal of Politics74 (2): 514–28.
52.
StroudNatalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication60 (3): 556–76.
53.
StroudNatalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–69.
55.
TilleyJamesHoboltSara B.2011. “Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics73 (2): 316–30.
56.
TreasJudith. 2010. “The Great American Recession: Sociological Insights on Blame and Pain.” Sociological Perspectives53 (1): 3–17.
57.
WeeksBrian E.GarrettR. Kelly. 2014. “Electoral Consequences of Political Rumors: Motivated Reasoning, Candidate Rumors, and Vote Choice during the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research26 (4): 401–22.
58.
WuH. DenisStevensonRobert L.ChenHsiao-ChiGünerZ. Nuray. 2002. “The Conditioned Impact of Recession News: A Time-Series Analysis of Economic Communication in the United States, 1987–1996.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research14 (1): 19–36.
59.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
