This paper uses Brazilian subnational panel data for 1997–2005 to examine how electoral and partisan pressures affect the ways in which state governors respond to protests over agrarian reform. The results are broadly consistent with the theoretical prediction that governors with precarious political positions are less likely to promote repressive policing strategies. A governor’s party’s share of seats in the state legislature is a significant positive predictor of both harsh and mild forms of repression. The percentage of votes attained in the first round of the previous election is an additional significant positive predictor of mild repression only.
AberbachJoel D.2002. “What’s Happened to the Watchful Eye?”Congress & the Presidency29 (1): 3–23.
2.
AgnoneJon. 2007. “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the U.S. Environmental Movement.” Social Forces85 (4): 1593–620.
3.
AltJamesMesquitaEthan Bueno deRoseShanna. 2011. “Disentangling Accountability and Competence in Elections: Evidence from U.S. Term Limits.” The Journal of Politics73 (1): 171–86.
4.
BarrosAluísio JD.HirakataVânia N. 2003. “Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.” BMC Medical Research Methodology3(1):21
5.
BeckElwood MeredithTolnay.Stewart E.1995. “Analyzing Historical Count Data: Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History28 (3): 125–31.
6.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 1995. “Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics110 (3): 769–98.
7.
BiggsMichaelAndrewsKenneth T.2015. “Protest Campaigns and Movement Success Desegregating the U.S. South in the Early 1960s.” American Sociological Review80 (2): 416–43. doi:10.1177/0003122415574328.
8.
BrenderAdiDrazenAllan. 2005. “Political Budget Cycles in New versus Established Democracies.” Journal of Monetary Economics52:1271–95.
9.
CaldeiraTeresa P.R.2002. “The paradox of police violence in democratic Brazil.” Ethnography3: 235-263
10.
CareySabine C.2006. “The Dynamic Relationship between Protest and Repression.” Political Research Quarterly59 (1): 1–11.
11.
CareySabine C.2010. “The Use of Repression as a Response to Domestic Dissent.” Political Studies58 (1): 167–86.
12.
ChavesMaria Carmen Araújo de Castro. 2008, “The relationship between private security companies and the state government of Pernambuco between 1999 and 2006: a case study” Master’s thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco.
13.
CheibubJosé A.FigueiredoArgelinaLimongiFernando. 2009. “Political Parties and Governors as Determinants of Legislative Behavior in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies, 1988–2006.” Latin American Politics and Society51 (1): 1–30.
14.
CoxeStefanyWestStephen G.Aiken.Leona S.2009. “The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and its Alternatives.” Journal of Personality Assessment91 (2): 121–36.
15.
DavenportChristian. 1995. “Multi-dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions.” American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 683–713.
16.
DavenportChristian. 1999. “Human Rights and the Democratic Proposition.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (1): 92–116.
17.
de la Luz InclánMaria. 2009. “Repressive Threats, Procedural Concessions, and the Zapatista Cycle of Protests, 1994–2003.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (2): 794–819.
EarlJenniferMartinAndrewMcCarthyJohn D.Soule.Sarah A.2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology30:65–80.
20.
Escribà-FolchAbel. 2013. “Repression, Political Threats, and Survival under Autocracy.” International Political Science Review34 (5): 543–60.
21.
FranciscoRonald A.1995. “The Relationship between Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Evaluation in Three Coercive States.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (2): 263–82.
22.
FranciscoRonald A.1996. “Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Test in Two Democratic States.” American Journal of Political Science40 (4): 1179–204.
23.
FranklinJames. 2009. “Contentious Challenges and Government Responses in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly62 (4): 700–14.
24.
GinkelJohnSmithAlastair. 1999. “So You Say You Want a Revolution: A Game Theoretic Explanation of Revolution in Repressive Regimes.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (3): 291–316.
25.
GriffinJohn D.2006. “Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis.” The Journal of Politics68 (4): 911–21.
26.
GuptaDipak K.SinghHarinderSpragueTom. 1993. “Government Coercion of Dissidents: Deterrence or Provocation?”The Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (2): 301–39.
27.
HammondJohn L.1999. “Law and Disorder: The Brazilian Landless Farmworkers’ Movement.” Bulletin of Latin American Research18 (4): 469–89.
28.
HammondJohn L.2009. “Land Occupations, Violence, and the Politics of Agrarian Reform in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives36 (4): 156–77. doi:10.1177/0094582X09338589.
29.
HendersonConway W.1991. “Conditions Affecting the Use of Political Repression.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (1): 120–42.
30.
HibbingJohn R.1984. “The Liberal Hour: Electoral Pressures and Transfer Payment Voting in the United States Congress.” The Journal of Politics46 (3): 846–65.
31.
HintonMercedes S.2006. The State on the Streets: Police and Politics in Argentina and Brazil. London: Lynne Rienner.
32.
HugginsMartha K.2000. “Urban Violence and Police Privatization in Brazil: Blended Invisibility.” Social Justice27 (2(80)): 113–34.
33.
KrinerDouglasSchwartzLiam. 2008. “Divided Government and Congressional Investigations.” Legislative Studies Quarterly33 (2): 295–321.
34.
MackinAnna. 2014. “Protest and Repression in Democratic Systems: A Comparative Analysis with a Focus on Brazil.” Unpublished D.Phil thesis, University of Oxford.
35.
MaestasCherie. 2003. “The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” The Journal of Politics65 (2): 439–56.
McAdamDougSuYang. 2002. “The War at Home: Antiwar Protests and Congressional Voting, 1965 to 1973.” American Sociological Review67 (5): 696–721.
38.
McCarthyNolanRazaghianRose. 1999. “Advice and Consent: Senate Responses to Executive Branch Nominations 1885–1996.” American Journal of Political Science43 (4): 1122–43.
39.
MitchellNeil J.McCormick.James M.1988. “Economic and Political Explanations of Human Rights Violations.” World Politics40 (4): 476–98.
40.
MooreWill H.2000. “The Repression of Dissent: A Substitution Model of Government Coercion.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (1): 107–27.
41.
NemeCristina. 1999. “The Police institution in the Democratic Order: The case of the Military Police in the state of São Paulo.” Master’s thesis, University of São Paulo
O’DonnellGuillermo A.1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy5 (1): 55–69.
44.
O’DonnellGuillermo A.1998. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy9 (3): 112–26.
45.
PanizzaFranciscoBritoAlexandra Barahona De. 1998. “The Politics of Human Rights in Democratic Brazil: ‘A Lei Não Pega.’”Democratization5 (4): 20–51.
46.
PereiraAnthony W.2008. “Public Security, Private Interests, and Police Reform in Brazil. In Democratic Brazil Revisited, edited by KingstonePeter R.PowerTimothy J., 185 – 208. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press
47.
PoeSteven C.TateNeal. 1994. “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.” The American Political Science Review88 (4): 853–72.
48.
PoeSteven C.TateNealKeithLinda Camp. 1999. “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-national Study Covering the Years 1976–1993.” International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 291–313.
RaslerK.1996. Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review61 (1): 132 – 152.
51.
ReamesBenjamin Nelson. 2008. “Neofeudal Aspects of Brazil’s Public Security.” In Comparative Policing: The Struggle for Democratization, edited by HaberfeldMaria R.CerrahIbrahim. New York: SAGE. 61 – 96.
52.
SakuraiSergio NaruhikoMenezes-FilhoNaercio. 2011. “Opportunistic and Partisan Election Cycles in Brazil: New Evidence at the Municipal Level.” Public Choice148:233–47.
53.
SamuelsDavidAbrucioFernando Luiz. 2000. “Federalism and Democratic Transitions: The ‘New’ Politics of the Governors in Brazil.” Publius30 (2): 43–62.
54.
WalgraveStefaanVliegenthartRens. 2012. “The Complex Agenda-Setting Power of Protest: Demonstrations, Media, Parliament, Government, and Legislation in Belgium, 1993–2000.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly17 (2): 129–56.
55.
ZangerSabine C.2000. “A Global Analysis of the Effect of Political Regime Changes on Life Integrity Violations, 1977–93.” Journal of Peace Research37:213–33.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
