Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? This study breaks from much previous research and attempts to explain conspiratorial beliefs with traditional theories of opinion formation. Specifically, we focus on the reception of informational cues given a set of predispositions (political and conspiratorial). We begin with observational survey data to show that there exists a unique predisposition that drives individuals to one degree or another to believe in conspiracy theories. This predisposition appears orthogonal to partisanship and predicts political behaviors including voter participation. Then a national survey experiment is used to test the effect of an informational cue on belief in a conspiracy theory while accounting for both conspiratorial predispositions and partisanship. Our results provide an explanation for individual-level heterogeneity in the holding of conspiratorial beliefs and also indicate the conditions under which information can drive conspiratorial beliefs.
AveryJames M.2006. “The Sources and Consequences of Political Mistrust among African Americans”. American Politics Research34:653–82.
5.
BanasJohn A.MillerGregory. 2013. “Inducing Resistance to Conspiracy Theory Propaganda: Testing Inoculation and Metainoculation Strategies”. Human Communication Research39:184–207.
6.
BarretoMatt A.CooperBetsy L.GonzalezBenjaminParkerChristopher S.TowlerChristopher. 2012. “The Tea Party in the Age of Obama: Mainstream Conservatism or Out-Group Anxiety?”Political Power and Social Theory22: 105–137.
7.
BerinskyAdam J.2007. “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict”. The Journal of Politics69:975–97.
8.
BerinskyAdam J.2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BerinskyAdam J.2013. “Telling the Truth about Believing the Lies?”Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 28.
11.
BerinskyAdam J.2015. “Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation”. British Journal of Political Science FirstView Article / November2015, pp 1–22 DOI: 10.1017/S0007123415000186, Published online: 19June 201
12.
BogartLaura M.ThorburnSheryl. 2005. “Are HIV/AIDS Conspiracy Beliefs a Barrier to HIV Prevention among African Americans?”JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes38:213–18.
13.
BostPreston R.PrunierStephen G.2013. “Rationality in Conspiracy Beliefs: The Role of Perceived Motive”. Psychological Reports113:118–28.
14.
BratichJack Zeljko. 2004. “Trust No One (On the Internet): The CIA-Crack-Contra Conspiracy Theory and Professional Journalism”. Television & New Media5:109–39.
15.
BrothertonRobertFrenchChristopher C.PickeringAlan D.2013. “Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale”. Frontiers in Psychology4:279.
16.
BruderMartinHaffkePeterNeaveNickNouripanahNinaImhoffRoland. 2013. “Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories across Cultures: The Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ)”. Frontiers in Psychology4:225.
17.
BurdenBarryKlofstadCasey. 2005. “Affect and Cognition in Party Identification”. Political Psychology26:869–86.
18.
ButlerLisa D.KoopmanCherylZimbardoPhilip G.1995. “The Psychological Impact of Viewing the Film JFK: Emotions, Beliefs, and Political Behavioral Intentions”. Political Psychology16:237–57.
19.
CampbellAngusConversePhilipMillerWarrenStokesDonald E.1960. The American Voter Unabridged Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DagnallNeilDrinkwaterKennethParkerAndrewDenovanAndrewPartonMegan. 2015. “Conspiracy Theory and Cognitive Style: A Worldview”. Frontiers in Psychology6:206.
22.
DavisBrion David, ed. 1972. “Fear of Conspiracy: Images of Un-American Subversion from the Revolution to the Present”. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
DeHaven-SmithLance. 2013. Conspiracy Theory in America. Austin: University of Texas Press.
24.
DixonRuth M.JonesJonathan A.2015. “Conspiracist Ideation as a Predictor of Climate-Science Rejection: An Alternative Analysis”. Psychological Science26:664–66.
25.
DouglasKaren M.SuttonRobbie M.2011. “Does It Take One to Know One? Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories Is Influenced by Personal Willingness to Conspire”. British Journal of Social Psychology50:544–52.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavid M.2015. “Do I Think BLS Data Are BS? The Consequences of Conspiracy Theories”. Political Behavior37:679–701.
28.
FurnhamAdrian. 2013. “Commercial Conspiracy Theories: A Pilot Study”. Frontiers in Psychology4:379.
29.
GoertzelTed. 1994. “Belief in Conspiracy Theories”. Political Psychology15:733–44.
30.
GreenDonald P.PalmquistBradleySchicklerEric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
Grzesiak-FeldmanMonika. 2013. “The Effect of High-Anxiety Situations on Conspiracy Thinking”. Current Psychology32:100–18.
32.
HajnalZoltan L.LeeTaeku. 2011. Why Americans Don’t Join the Party: Race, Immigration, and the Failure (Of Political Parties) to Engage the Electorate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.
HofstadterRichard. 1964. The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34.
HustingGinaOrrMartin. 2007. “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion”. Symbolic Interaction30:127–50.
35.
ImhoffRolandBruderMartin. 2014. “Speaking (Un-)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude”. European Journal of Personality28:25–43.
36.
InhofeJames. 2012. The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future. Washington, DC: WND Books.
37.
JolleyDanielDouglasKaren M.2014a. “The Effects of Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions”. PLoS ONE9:e89177.
38.
JolleyDanielDouglasKaren M.2014b. “The Social Consequences of Conspiracism: Exposure to Conspiracy Theories Decreases Intentions to Engage in Politics and to Reduce One’s Carbon Footprint”. British Journal of Psychology105:35–56.
KataAnna. 2010. “A Postmodern Pandora’s Box: Anti-vaccination Misinformation on the Internet”. Vaccine28:1709–16.
41.
KeeleyBrian. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories”. Journal of Philosophy96:109–26.
42.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation”. American Journal of Political Science44:347–61.
43.
KnightPeter, ed. 2002. Conspiracy Nation: The Politics of Paranoia in Postwar America. New York: New York University Press.
44.
LewandowskyStephanEckerUllrich K. H.SeifertColleen M.SchwarzNorbertCookJohn. 2012. “Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing”. Psychological Science in the Public Interest13:106–31.
45.
LewandowskyStephanGignacGilles E.OberauerKlaus. 2013. “The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science”. PLoS ONE8:e75637.
46.
LewandowskyStephanOberauerKlausGignacGilles. 2013. “NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science”. Psychological Science5:622–33.
47.
LipsetSeymour MartinRaabEarl. 1978. The Politics of Unreason: Right-Wing Extremism in America 1790-1977. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
MannChristopher. 2012. “Cooperative Congressional Election Study: University of Miami Content”. Release pending. University of Miami, Coral Gables. http://cces.gov.harvard.edu.
McCloskyHerbertChongDennis. 1985. “Similarities and Differences between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals”. British Journal of Political Science15:329–63.
51.
McHoskeyJohn W.1995. “Case Closed? On the John F. Kennedy Assassination: Biased Assimilation of Evidence and Attitude Polarization”. Basic and Applied Social Psychology17:395–409.
52.
MelleyTimothy. 2000. Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
MillerJoanne M.SaundersKyle L.FarhartChristina E.2015. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust”. American Journal of Political Science. Early View: 27NOV2015 DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12234
54.
MooreAlfred.2015. “Conspiracies, Conspiracy Theories, and Democracy”. Political Studies Review. Early View: 23SEP2015 DOI: 10.1111/1478-9302.12102
NyhanBrendanDickinsonFranklinDuddingSashaDylgjeriEnxhiNeileyEricPulleritsChristopherSeogMinaeSimpsonAndySzilagyiHeatherWalmsleyColin. Forthcoming. “Classified or Coverup? The Effect of Redactions on Conspiracy Theory Beliefs”. Journal of Experimental Political Science.
61.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions”. Political Behavior32:303–30.
62.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJasonUbelPeter A.2013. “The Hazards of Correcting Myths about Health Care Reform”. Medical Care51:127–32.
63.
OliverJ. EricWoodThomas J.2014a. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion”. American Journal of Political Science58:952–66.
64.
OliverJ. EricWoodThomas J.2014b. “Medical Conspiracy Theories and Health Behaviors in the United States”. JAMA Internal Medicine174:817–18.
65.
OlmstedKathryn S.2008. Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11. New York: Oxford University Press.
PipesDaniel. 1997. Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From. New York: TouchStone.
69.
RaabMarius HansAuerNikolasOrtliebStefan A.CarbonClaus-Christian. 2013. “The Sarrazin Effect: The Presence of Absurd Statements in Conspiracy Theories Makes Canonical Information Less Plausible”. Frontiers in Psychology4:453.
70.
RobinsRobert S.PostJerrold M.1997. Political Paranoia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
71.
RoginMichael Paul. 1988. “‘Ronald Reagan’ the Movie: And Other Episodes in Political Demonology”. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72.
RussoFrank D. 1971–1972. “A Study of Bias in TV Coverage of the Vietnam War: 1969 and 1970”. The Public Opinion Quarterly35:539–43.
73.
SchumanHowardPresserStanley. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
74.
SearsDavid O.1990. “Whither Political Socialization Research? The Questions of Persistence”. In Political Socialization, Citizenship Education and Democracy, edited by IchilovOrit, 69–97. New York: Teachers College Press.
75.
StempelCarlHargroveThomasStempelGuido H.2007. “Media Use, Social Structure, and Belief in 9/11 Conspiracy Theories”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly84:353–72.
76.
SunsteinCass R.VermeuleAdrian2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures”. Journal of Political Philosophy17:202–27.
77.
SwamiVirenColesRebeccaStiegerStefanPietschnigJakobFurnhamAdrianRehimSherryVoracekMartin. 2011. “Conspiracist Ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a Monological Belief System and Associations between Individual Psychological Differences and Real-World and Fictitious Conspiracy Theories”. British Journal of Psychology102:443–63.
78.
SwamiVirenNaderIngo W.PietschnigJakobStiegerStefanTranUlrich S.VoracekMartin. 2012. “Personality and Individual Difference Correlates of Attitudes toward Human Rights and Civil Liberties”. Personality and Individual Differences53:443–47.
79.
SwamiVirenPietschnigJakobTranUlrich S.NaderIngo W.StiegerStefanVoracekMartin. 2013. “Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs about the Moon Landings”. Applied Cognitive Psychology27:71–80.
80.
TeslerMichaelSearsDavid O.2010. Obama’s Race: The 2008 Election and the Dream of a Post-racial America. Chicago Studies in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81.
TomzMichaelWittenbergJasonKingGary. 2001. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results”. Cambridge, MA Harvard University
82.
TourangeauRogerRipsLance J.RasinskiKenneth. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press.
83.
UscinskiJoseph E.ParentJoseph M.2014. American Conspiracy Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.
84.
WattsMark D.DomkeDavidShahDhavan V.FanDavid P.1999. “Elite Cues and Media Bias in Presidential Campaigns: Explaining Public Perceptions of a Liberal Press”. Communication Research26:144–75.
85.
WoodGordon S.1982. “Conspiracy and the Paranoid Style: Causality and Deceit in the Eighteenth Century”. William and Mary Quarterly39:402–41.
86.
WoodMichael J.DouglasKaren M.SuttonRobbie M.2012. “Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories”. Social Psychological & Personality Science. 3: 767-773.
87.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
