This study provides micro-level evidence for the new theories of accountability under globalization. We analyze the micro-level logic that underpins political accountability in democratic countries with highly globalized economies. We contend that voters discount current economic conditions in evaluating incumbent leaders if they perceive the incumbent leader moving the country in the right direction. We test this argument with survey data from eight European countries in 2012, while controlling for potential alternative explanations associated with pocketbook, sociotropic, and clarity-of-responsibility factors. We find that valence considerations related to future directions in the country sustain positive evaluations of leaders’ performance even in the face of negative evaluations of the economy.
AchenChristopher H.2005. “Let’s Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They Belong.” Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (4): 327–39.
2.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.2012. “Blind Retrospection: Why Shark Attacks Are Bad for Democracy.” Working paper, Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Vanderbilt University. www.vanderbilt.edu/csdi/research/CSDI_WP_05-2013.pdf.
3.
AlcañizIsabellaHellwigTimothy. 2011. “Who’s to Blame? The Distribution of Responsibility in Developing Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science41 (2): 389–411.
4.
AndersonChristopher J.2000. “Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies19 (2–3): 151–70.
5.
AndersonChristopher J.2007. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science10:271–96.
6.
BecherMichaelDonnellyMichael. 2013. “Economic Performance, Individual Evaluations, and the Vote: Investigating the Causal Mechanism.” Journal of Politics75 (4): 968–79.
7.
BellucciPaoloCosta LoboMarinaLewis-BeckMichael S.2012. “Economic Crisis and Elections: The European Periphery.” Electoral Studies31 (3): 469–71.
8.
BerkRichard A.2006. “An Introduction to Ensemble Methods for Data Analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research34 (3): 263–95.
BrinegarAdam P.JollySeth K.2005. “Location, Location, Location: National Contextual Factors and Public Support for European Integration.” European Union Politics6 (2): 155–80.
11.
CáceresNeilaMaloneSamuel W.2013. “Forecasting Leadership Transitions around the World.” International Journal of Forecasting29 (4): 575–91.
12.
CernyPhilip G.2010. Rethinking World Politics: A Theory of Transnational Neopluralism. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChappellHenryKeechWilliam R.1985. “A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance.” American Political Science Review79 (2): 10–27.
de MarchiScott. 2005. Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
De’athGlennFabriciusKatharina E.2000. “Classification and Regression Trees: A Powerful yet Simple Technique for the Analysis of Complex Ecological Data.” Ecology81 (11): 3178–92.
17.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harpers Collins.
18.
DreherAxelGastonNoelMartensPim. 2008. Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences. New York: Springer.
19.
DuchRaymond M.StevensonRandy. 2010. “The Global Economy, Competency, and the Economic Vote.” Journal of Politics72 (1): 105–23.
20.
EvansGeoffreyAndersenRobert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” Journal of Politics68 (1): 194–207.
21.
EzrowLawrenceHellwigTimothy. 2014. “Responding to Voters or Responding to Markets? Political Parties and Public Opinion in an Era of Globalization.” International Studies Quarterly58 (4): 816–27.
22.
FearonJames D.1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by PrzeworskiAdamStokesSusan C.ManinBernard, Chap. 2, 55–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
FiorinaMorris P.1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science22 (2): 426–43.
24.
FossatiDiego. 2014. “Economic Vulnerability and Economic Voting in 14 OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Research53 (1): 116–35.
25.
GallagherMichaelMitchellPaul, eds. 2008. The Politics of Electoral Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
HastieTrevorTibshiraniRobertFriedmanJerome. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. New York: Springer.
27.
HealyAndrew J.MalhotraNeilMoCecilia Hyunjung. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters’ Evaluations of Government Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107 (29): 12804–809.
28.
HellwigTimothy T.2001. “Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting.” Journal of Politics63 (4): 1141–62.
29.
HellwigTimothy T.2007. “Globalization and Perceptions of Policy Maker Competence: Evidence from France.” Political Research Quarterly60 (1): 146–58.
30.
HellwigTimothy T.2008. “Globalization, Policy Constraints, and Vote Choice.” Journal of Politics70 (4): 1128–41.
31.
HellwigTimothy T.RingsmuthEve M.FreemanJohn R.2008. “The American Public and the Room to Maneuver: Responsibility Attributions and Policy Efficacy in an Era of Globalization.” International Studies Quarterly52 (4): 855–80.
32.
HellwigTimothy T.SamuelsDavid. 2007. “Voting in Open Economies: The Electoral Consequences of Globalization.” Comparative Political Studies40 (3): 283–306.
33.
HibbsDouglas A.2006. “Voting and the Macroeconomy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by WeingastBarry R.WittmanDonald A., Chap. 31, 565–86. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
HothornTorstenHornikKurtZeileisAchim. 2006. “Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics15 (3): 651–74.
35.
HutchingsVincent L.2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
JamesGarethWittenDanielaHastieTrevorTibshiraniRobert. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R. New York: Springer.
37.
KastellecJonathan P.2010. “The Statistical Analysis of Judicial Decisions and Legal Rules with Classification Trees.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies7 (2): 202–30.
38.
KiewietD. Roderick.1981. “Policy-Oriented Voting in Response to Economic Issues.” American Political Science Review75 (2): 448–59.
39.
KinderDonald R.KiewietD. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science11 (2): 129–61.
40.
KuhnMaxJohnsonKjell. 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer.
41.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
42.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science3:183–219.
43.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2007. “Economic Models of Voting.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by DaltonRussell J.KlingemannHans-Dieter, Chap. 27, 518–37. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
MacDonaldStuart ElaineListhaugOlaRabinowitzGeorge. 1991. “Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems.” American Political Science Review85 (4): 1107–31.
45.
MagalhãesPedro C.2014. “Introduction—Financial Crisis, Austerity, and Electoral Politics.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties24 (2): 125–33.
46.
MaloyJ. S.2014. “Linkages of Electoral Accountability: Empirical Results and Methodological Lessons.” Politics and Governance2 (2): 13–27.
47.
ManinBernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
ManinBernardPrzeworskiAdamStokesSusan C.1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by PrzeworskiAdamStokesSusan C.ManinBernard, Chap. 1, 29–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
MansfieldEdward D.MutzDiana C.2009. “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety.” International Organization63 (3): 425–57.
50.
PaldamMartin. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades.” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, edited by NorpothHelmutLewis-BeckMichael S.LafayJean-Dominique, 9–31. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
51.
PowellG. BinghamJr.WhittenGuy D.1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 391–414.
52.
PrzeworskiAdamStokesSusan C.ManinBernard, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SchumpeterJoseph A.1976. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
55.
SteinerNils D.2010. “Economic Globalization and Voter Turnout in Established Democracies.” Electoral Studies29 (3): 444–59.
56.
StroblCarolinMalleyJamesTutzGerhard. 2009. “An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rationale, Application, and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests.” Psychological Methods14 (4): 323–48.
57.
TavitsMargit. 2007. “Clarity of Responsibility and Corruption.” American Journal of Political Science51 (1): 218–29.
58.
VowlesJackXezonakisGeorgios. 2010. “From Positional to Valence Issues? Ideology, Leadership, Globalization, and Electoral Choice.” Paper delivered at the Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties (EPOP) Conference, University of Essex, Colchester, UK, September 10–12.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
