Rates of contact with the criminal justice system are geographically and racially sensitive such that some groups of people experience contact at much higher rates than others. The negative effects of personal contact with the criminal justice system are well documented. Less well understood are the effects of the criminal justice system on those who have not had personal contact but who are members of groups where contact is a common occurrence. This research explores the political effects of the carceral state for the second group, and finds that proximal contact mobilizes, an effect that is most pronounced for nonwhites.
AlexanderMichelle. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
2.
BaerDemelzaBhatiAvinashBrooksLisaCastroJenniferLa VigneNancyMallik- KaneKamalaNaserRebecca. 2006. “Understanding the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry: Research Findings from the Urban Institute’s Prisoner Reentry Portfolio.” Urban Institute Justice Policy Center, Washington, DC.
3.
BarretoMatt A.2010. Ethnic Cues: The Role of Shared Ethnicity in Latino Political Participation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
BarretoMatt A.ManzanoSylviaRamirezRicardoKathyRim. 2009. “Mobilization, Participation, and Solidaridad: Latino Participation in the 2006 Immigration Protest Rallies.” Urban Affairs Review44 (5): 736–64.
5.
BarretoMatt A.WoodsNathan D.2005. “Latino Voting Behavior in an Anti-Latino Political Context: The Case of Los Angeles County.” In Diversity in Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, edited by SeguraGary M.BowlerShaun, 148–69. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
6.
BoboLawrenceGilliamFranklin D.1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review84 (2): 377–93.
7.
BrownGeneva. 2010. “The Intersectionality of Race, Gender and Reentry: Challenges for African American Women.” Issue Brief.. Washington, DC: American Constitution Society.
8.
BurchTraci. 2013. Trading Democracy for Justice: Criminal Convictions and the Decline of Neighborhood Political Participation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
CadoraEricSwartzCharlesGordonMannix. 2003. “Criminal Justice and Health and Human Services: An Exploration of Overlapping Needs, Resources, and Interests in Brooklyn Neighborhoods.” In Prisoners Once Removed, edited by TravisJeremyWaulMichelle, 285–313. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
10.
ChoWendy K. TamGimpelJames G.WuTony. 2006. “Clarifying the Role of SES in Political Participation: Policy Threat and Arab American Mobilization.” Journal of Politics68 (4): 977–91.
11.
ClearTodd R.2007. Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
DawsonMichael C.1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
FrymerPaul. 2005. “Racism Revised: Courts, Labor Law, and the Institutional Construction of Racial Animus.” American Political Science Review99 (3): 373–87.
14.
GecasVictor. 1982. “The Self-Concept.” Annual Review of Sociology8:1–33.
15.
GilmoreRuth Wilson. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. London: University of California Press.
16.
GranovetterMark. 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory1:201–33.
17.
HartleyRichard D.ArmendarizLouisa F.2011. “Border Justice? Sentencing Federal Narcotics Offenders in Southwest Border Districts: A Focus on Citizenship Status.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice27 (43): 44–61.
18.
JohnsonElizabeth I.EasterlingBeth. 2012. “Understanding the Unique Effects of Parental Incarceration on Children: Challenges, Progress and Recommendations.” Journal of Marriage and Family74:342–56.
19.
LeighlyJan E.MatsubayashiTetsuya. 2009. “The Implications of Class, Race and Ethnicity for Political Networks.” American Politics Research37 (5): 824–55.
20.
LermanAmy E.2013. The Modern Prison Paradox: Politics, Punishment, and Social Community. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
ManzaJeffUggenChristopher. 2006. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
MatthewsDonald R.ProthroJames W.1966. Negroes and the New Southern Politics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
23.
MettlerSuzanneWelchEric. 2004. “Civic Generation: Policy Feedback Effects of the GI Bill on Political Involvement over the Life Course.” British Journal of Political Science34:497–518.
24.
MillerLisa. 2008. The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
MurakawaNaomi. 2006. “The Racial Antecedents to Federal Sentencing Guidelines: How Congress Judged the Judges from Brown to Booker.” Roger Williams University Law Review11:473–94.
26.
MurakawaNaomiBeckettKathrine. 2010. “The Penology of Racial Innocence: The Erasure of Racism in the Study and Practice of Punishment.” Law & Society Review44 (3): 695–730.
27.
MurakawaNaomi. 2014. The First Civil Right: Liberal Law-and-Order and the Rise of Mass Incarceration. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
PagerDevah. 2003. “The Mark of a Criminal Record.” The American Journal of Sociology108 (5): 937–75.
29.
PantojaAdrian D.RamirezRicardoSeguraGary M.2001. “Citizens by Choice, Voters by Necessity: Patterns in Political Mobilization by Naturalized Latinos.” Political Research Quarterly54:729–50.
30.
ParkerChristopher. 2009. “When Politics Becomes Protest: Black Veterans and Political Activism in the Postwar South.” Journal of Politics71 (1): 113–31.
31.
RamakrishnanS. Karthick. 2005. Democracy in Immigrant America: Changing Demographics and Political Participation. Chicago: Stanford University Press.
32.
RobertsJulian. 1992. “Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice.” Crime and Justice16:99–180.
33.
RodriguezMichelle NatividadEmsellemMaurice. 2011. “65 Million ‘Need Not Apply’: The Case for Reforming Criminal Background Checks for Employment.” The National Employment Law Project, New York.
34.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenMark J.1993. Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan
35.
SabolWilliamWestHeather. 2010. “Prisoners in 2009.” Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
36.
SampsonRobert J.LoefflerCharles. 2010. “Punishment’s Place: The Local Concentration of Mass Incarceration.” Daedalus139 (3): 20–31.
37.
SanchezGabriel R.2006. “The Role of Group Consciousness in Political Participation among Latinos in the United States.” American Politics Research34 (4): 427–50.
38.
SossJoe. 1999. “Lesson of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” The American Political Science Review93 (2): 363–80.
39.
TateKatherine. 1994. From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40.
The New Jersey Institute for Social Justice. 2006. “Legal Barriers to Prisoner Reentry in New Jersey.” http://www.njisj.org.
41.
The Washington Poll. 2012. “The University of Washington, Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race, and Sexuality.” http://www.washingtonpoll.org.
42.
TravisJeremyKeeganSineadCadoraEric. 2003. “A Portrait of Prisoner Reentry in New Jersey.” Urban Institute Justice Policy Center. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
43.
UggenChristopherManzaJeff. 2002. “Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States.” American Sociological Review67 (6): 777–803.
44.
UggenChristopherManzaJeff. 2003. “Ballot Manipulation and the ‘Menace of Negro Domination’: Racial Threat and Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850-2002.” American Journal of Sociology109 (3): 559–605.
WeaverVeslaLermanAmy. 2010. “Political Consequences of the Carceral State.” American Political Science Review104 (4): 817–33.
47.
WesternBruce. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
48.
WesternBruceWildemanChristopher. 2009. “The Black Family and Mass Incarceration.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science621 (1): 221–42.
