The Seventeenth Amendment transferred responsibility for selecting senators from state legislatures to voters. Scholars argue that voters’ ability to sanction performance ex post altered senators’ legislative activities. I focus on voters’ ex ante screening of senators. Using original data on senators’ political experiences, I show that direct elections increased the professionalization of pre-Senate careers. I then use sequence analysis methods to identify career paths to the Senate. Pre-Senate career paths help explain which senators received important committee assignments. These findings challenge claims that direct elections had minimal effects on the Senate’s composition and that recruitment is unrelated to legislative behavior.
ArnoldLaura W.2001. “The Distribution of Senate Committee Positions: Change or More of the Same?” Legislative Studies Quarterly26 (2): 227–48.
2.
BafumiJosephHerronMichael C.2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism.” American Political Science Review104 (3): 519–42.
3.
BernhardWilliamSalaBrian R.2006. “The Remaking of an American Senate: The 17th Amendment and Ideological Responsiveness.” Journal of Politics68 (2): 345–57.
4.
BradyDavidBrodyRichardEpsteinDavid. 1989. “Heterogeneous Parties and Political Organization: The U.S. Senate, 1880-1920.” Legislative Studies Quarterly14:205–23.
5.
BradyDavidBuckleyKaraRiversDouglas. 1999. “The Roots of Careerism in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly24 (4): 489–510.
6.
Brandes CrookSaraHibbingJohn R.1997. “A Not-So-Distant Mirror: The 17th Amendment and Congressional Change.” American Political Science Review91 (4): 845–53.
7.
BullockCharles S.1985. “U.S. Senate Committee Assignments: Preferences, Motivations, and Success.” American Journal of Political Science29:789–808.
CanonDavid T.StewartCharlesIII. 2001. “The Evolution of the Committee System in Congress.” In Congress Reconsidered, edited by DoddLawrence C.OppenheimerBruce I., 7th edition, 163-89. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10.
CarsonJamieRobertsJason M.2005. “Strategic Politicians and U.S. House Elections, 1874-1914.” Journal of Politics67 (2): 474–96.
11.
DavidsonRoger H.1990. “The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946.” Legislative Studies Quarterly15 (3): 357–73.
12.
DaynesByron W.1971. “The Impact of the Direct Election of Senators on the Political System.” PhD diss., University of Chicago.
13.
DubinMichael J.1998. U.S. Congressional Elections, 1788-1997. Jefferson: McFarland.
14.
FearonJames. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by PrzeworskiAdamStokesSusanManinBernard, 55-97. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GailmardSeanJenkinsJeffery A.2009. “Agency Problems, the 17th Amendment, and Representation in the Senate.” American Journal of Political Science53 (2): 324–42.
16.
GreenblattAlan. 2014. “Rethinking the 17th Amendment. It’s All Politics.” National Public Radio, February5. http://www.npr.org/blogs.
17.
HaynesGeorge H.1938. The Senate of the United States. New York: Russell & Russell.
18.
KingGary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LeeFrances E.2009. Beyond Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
MacindoeHeatherAbbottAndrew. 2004. “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Techniques for Social Science Data.” In Handbook of Data Analysis, edited by HardyMelissaBrymanAlan, 387-406. London: SAGE.
21.
MacKenzieScott A.2014. “Life before Congress.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Davis.
22.
MatthewsDonald R.1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: A Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25.
MeinkeScott R.2008. “Institutional Change and the Electoral Connection in the Senate: Revisiting the Effects of Direct Election.” Political Research Quarterly61 (3): 445–57.
26.
RikerWilliam. 1955. “The Senate and American Federalism.” American Political Science Review49:452–69.
27.
RipleyRandall B.1969. Power in the Senate. New York: St. Martin’s.
28.
SchillerWendy J.2000. Partners and Rivals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
SchillerWendy J.2006. “Building Careers and Courting Constituents: U.S. Senate Representation 1889-1924.” Studies in American Political Development20:185–97.
30.
SchillerWendy J.StewartCharlesIIIXiongBenjamin. 2013. “U.S. Senate Elections before the 17th Amendment.” Journal of Politics75 (3): 835–47.
31.
SinclairBarbara. 1988. “The Distribution of Committee Positions in the U.S. Senate: Explaining Institutional Change.” American Journal of Political Science32:276–301.
32.
SmithSteven S.2011. “The Senate Syndrome.” In The U.S. Senate: From Deliberation to Dysfunction, edited by LoomisBurdett, 132-158. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
StewartCharlesIII. 1992. “Responsiveness in the Upper Chamber.” In The Constitution and American Political Development, edited by NardulliPeter, 63-96. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
34.
SyllaRichard E.LeglerJohn B.WallisJohn. 1995. “State and Local Government [Computer file].” ICPSR 06304, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor.
35.
TheriaultSean M.2013. The Gingrich Senators. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
WardJoe H.1963. “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.” Journal of the American Statististical Association58 (301): 236-44.
37.
WareAlan. 2002. The American Direct Primary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
WawroGregory J.SchicklerEric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
WeberMax. (1919) 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
