Using data from the 2008 presidential nomination contest, we offer systematic tests of the relationships between traditional campaign factors, the Internet and campaign performance. We find that claims of the Internet’s relevance to modern campaigns are warranted, as it is a unique facet of campaigns and significantly improves candidates’ financial and electoral support. The Internet is especially helpful to candidates in generating small-donor contributions and in maximizing contributions after early primary victories. Overall, these findings suggest that the Internet offers a viable mechanism for long-shot candidates to overcome the resource demands of the current presidential nomination system.
AbramsonP. R.ClaggettW.2001. “Recruitment and Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly54 (4): 905–16.
2.
AldrichJ.2009. “The Invisible Primary and Its Effects on Democratic Choice.” Political Science and Politics42 (1): 33–38.
3.
BeckN.KatzJ. N.1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review89:634–47.
4.
BimberB.1998. “The Internet and Political Mobilization.” Social Science Computer Review16 (4): 391–401.
5.
BimberB. A.DavisR.2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in US Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BrownC. W.PowellL. W.WilcoxC.1995. Serious Money: Fundraising and Contributing in Presidential Nomination Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ButlerR. L.2004. Claiming the Mantle: How Presidential Nominations Are Won and Lost Before the Votes Are Cast. Boulder: Westview Press.
8.
CeaserJ.BuschA.PitneyJ.2009. Epic Journey: The 2008 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
CohenM.KarolD.NoelH.ZallerJ.2008. Beating Reform: Political Parties and Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CornfieldM.2012. “More: Digital Media and the Densification of Presidential Campaign Discourse.” In The Making of the Presidential Candidates 2012, edited by MayerWilliamBernsteinJonathan107–32. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
DahlgrenP.2005. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication22 (2): 147–62.
12.
DamoreD. F.1997. “A Dynamic Model of Candidate Fundraising: The Case of Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly50 (2): 343–64.
DeweyJ.[1927] 1954. The Public and its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
15.
FranciaP. L.2003. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
GodwinR. K.1988. One Billion Dollars of Influence: The Direct Marketing of Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
17.
GreenJ. C.2006. “Financing the 2004 Presidential Nomination Campaigns” In. Financing the 2004 Election. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
18.
GurianP. H.1986. “Resource Allocation Strategies in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science30 (4): 802–21.
19.
HabermasJ.[1962] 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Translated by BurgerT.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Hall-JamiesonK., ed. 2009. Electing the President 2008: The Insiders View. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
HarfoushR.2009. Yes We Did! An Inside Look at How Social Media Built the Obama Brand. Berkeley: New Riders Press.
22.
HendricksJ. A.DentonR.Jr., eds. 2010. Communicator-in-Chief: How Barack Obama Used New Media Technology to Win the White House. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
23.
HerrnsonP. S.2008. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. 5th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
24.
JackmanS.2009. Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences. Vol. 846. New York: Wiley.
25.
JohnsonD. ed. 2009. Campaigning for President 2008: Strategy and Tactics, New Voices and New Techniques. New York: Routledge.
26.
JohnsonD. ed. 2011. Campaigning in the Twenty-First Century: A Whole New Ballgame?New York: Routledge.
27.
KaidL. L.2009. “Changing and Staying the Same: Communication in Campaign 2008.” Journalism Studies10 (3): 417–23.
28.
KenskiK.HardyB. W.JamiesonK. Hall. 2010. The Obama Victory: How Money, Media and Message Shaped the 2008 Election. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
KerbelM.2009. Netroots: Online Progressives and the Transformation of American Politics. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
30.
KlotzR.1997. “Positive Spin: Senate Campaigning on the Web.” Political Science and Politics30 (3): 482–86.
31.
MayerW. G.2003. “Forecasting Presidential Nominations or, My Model Worked Just Fine, Thank You.” Political Science and Politics36 (02): 153–57.
32.
MutzD. C.1997. “Mechanisms of Momentum: Does Thinking Make It So?” Journal of Politics59:104–25.
33.
NorrisP.2000. A Virtuous Circle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
OwenD.2009. “The Campaign and the Media.” In The American Elections of 2008, edited by Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.SchierSteven1st ed., 9–32. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
PanagopoulosC. ed. 2012. Strategy, Money and Technology in the 2008 Elections. London: Taylor & Francis.
36.
PanagopoulosC.BerganD.2006. “Contributions and Contributors in the 2004 Presidential Election Cycle” Presidential Studies Quarterly36 (2): 155–71.
37.
PanagopoulosC.BalsaraN.2009. Politicking Online: The Transformation of Election Campaign Communications. London: Rutgers University Press.
38.
PaolinoP.ShawD. R.2003. “Can the Internet Help Outsider Candidates Win the Presidential Nomination?” Political Science and Politics36 (2): 193–97.
39.
RedlawskD. C.TolbertC. J.DonovanT.2011. Why Iowa? How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nominating Process. University of Chicago Press.
40.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M.1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
StegerW.2000. “Do Primary Voters Draw from a Stacked Deck? Presidential Nominations in an Era of Candidate-Centered Campaigns.” Presidential Studies Quarterly30 (4): 727–53.
43.
SunsteinC.2001. Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
44.
TeachoutZ.StreeterT., eds. 2008. Mousepads, Shoe Leather and Hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean Campaign for the Future of Internet Politics. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
45.
TolbertC. J.McNealR. S.2003. “Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation?” Political Research Quarterly56 (2): 175–85.
46.
TrammellK. D.WilliamsA. P.PostelnicuM.LandrevilleK. D.2006. “Evolution of Online Campaigning: Increasing Interactivity in Candidate Web Sites and Blogs through Text and Technical Features.” Mass Communication and Society9 (1): 21–44.
47.
TrippiJ.2004. The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the Overthrow of Everything. New York: HarperCollins.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
