Presidents should prefer to be positively remembered in history for improving their country’s conditions, rather than to be hated for generations. Few, however, succeed. Why? The inquiry goes beyond historic accounts or mere intellectual curiosity; it is a key part of understanding presidential decision making. We answer this question using data from an expert survey on the Mexican Presidency, the first of its kind for Mexico. Problem-solving capacities and presidents’ ability to change the existing institutions are the main determinants of success. Corruption is barely punished by experts. Negative remembrance in history is associated to authoritarianism and economic crises.
AlduncinEnrique. 1986. Los Valores de los Mexicanos: México entre la Tradición y la Modernidad. México: Banco Nacional de México.
2.
BaileyThomas A. 1966. Presidential Greatness: The Image and the Man from George Washington to the Present. New York: Appleton-Century.
3.
BeverlinMattOstranderIan2008. “The Politics of Presidential Legacies.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
4.
BurnsJames M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
5.
CameronCharles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CampRoderic. 1993. La Política en México, el Declive del Autoritarismo [Politics in Mexico, The Decline of Authoritarism]. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
7.
CarpizoJorge. 2002. El Presidencialismo Mexicano [The Mexican Presidentialism]. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
8.
CasarMaría Amparo. 1997. “The Sources of Presidential Authority in Post-Revolutionary Mexico.” Ph.D. diss., Cambridge University.
9.
Cosío VillegasDaniel. 1972. El Sistema Político Mexicano [The Mexican Political System]. Mexico: Editorial Joaquín Mortiz.
10.
Cosío VillegasDaniel. 1974. El Estilo Personal de Gobernar [The Personal Governing Style]. Mexico: Editorial Joaquín Mortiz.
11.
CrespoJosé Antonio. 2004. El Fracaso Histórico del Presidencialismo Mexicano [The Historical Failure of Mexican Presidentialism]. México: Fondo de Cultural Económica.
12.
ElizondoCarlos. 1987. La Silla Embrujada [The Bewitched Chair]. Mexico: Edamex.
13.
FaberCharlesFaberRichard. 1997. The American Presidents Ranked by Performance. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
14.
FineJeffrey A.WatermanRichard. 2008. “A New Model of Presidential Leadership: Controlling the Bureaucracy.” In Presidential Leadership: The Vortex of Power, edited by RockmanBert19–43. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
FowlerWill, ed. 2009. Gobernantes Mexicanos. Vols. I–II. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
16.
GarnerPaul H. 2001. Porfirio Díaz: Profiles in Power. New York: Longman.
17.
GoertzGary. 2006. Social Science Concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
GoldenMiriam. 2005. “Some Puzzles of Political Corruption in Modern Advanced Democracies.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Japan Political Science Association, Tokio, Japan.
19.
HaggardStephenMcCubbinsMathew D.eds. 2001. Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44:347–61.
22.
KossoPeter. 2009. “Philosophy of Historiography.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, edited by TuckerAviezer, 7–25. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
23.
KrauzeEnrique. 1987. Porfirio Díaz. Místico de la Autoridad [Porfirio Díaz. The Authority Mystic]. Mexico: FCE.
24.
KrauzeEnrique. 1994. Siglo de Caudillos. Biografía Política de México (1810–1910) [Caudillos Century. Mexico’s Political Biography (1810–1910)]. Mexico: Tusquets Editores.
25.
KrauzeEnrique. 1997. Biografía del Poder: Caudillos de la Revolución Mexicana (1910–1940) [The Biography of Power. Mexican Revolution’s Caudillos (1910–1940)]. Mexico: Tusquets Editores.
26.
KrauzeEnrique. 2002. La Presidencia Imperial. Ascenso y Caída del Sistema Político Mexicano (1940–1996) [The Imperial Presidency. Raise and Fall of the Mexican Political System (1940–1996)]. Mexico: Tusquets Editores.
27.
LongJ. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
28.
LustickIan. 1996. “History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias.” The American Political Science Review90:605–18.
29.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MainwaringScottShugartMatthew Sobergeds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
McCullaghBehan C. 2002. “Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation.” History and Theory39:39–66.
32.
MoeTerry. 1993. “Presidents, Institutions, and Theory.” In Researching the Presidency: Vital Questions, New Approaches, edited by EdwardsGeorge C.KesselJohn H.RockmanBert A., 337–85. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
33.
MorenoAlejandro. 2009. La Decisión Electoral. Votantes, Partidos y Democracia en México. Mexico: H. Cámara de Diputados, LX Legislatura and Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
34.
MurrayRobert K.BlessingTim H.1994. Greatness in the White House: Rating the Presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
35.
NelsonMichael. 2000. “Evaluating the Presidency.” In The Presidency and the Political System, edited by NelsonMichael, 1–23. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
36.
NeustadtRichard E. 1990. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Wiley.
37.
NicholsCurt. 2012. “The Presidential Ranking Game: Critical Review and Some New Discoveries.” Presidential Studies Quarterly42:275–99.
38.
PfiffnerJames P. 2003. “Ranking the Presidents: Continuity and Volatility.” White House Studies3:23–34.
39.
PiousRichard M. 2008. Why Presidents Fail. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
40.
RagsdaleLyn. 2000. “Studying the Presidency: Why Presidents Need Political Scientists.” In The Presidency and the Political System, edited by NelsonMichael, 29–63. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
41.
ReedSteven R. 1999. “Punishing Corruption: The Response of the Japanese Electorate to Scandals.” In Political Psychology in Japan: Behind the Nails Which Sometimes Stick Out (and Get Hammered Down), edited by FeldmanOfer, 131–48. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
42.
RidingsWilliam J.McIverStuart B.1997. Rating the Presidents: A Ranking of U.S. Leaders, from the Great and Honorable to the Dishonest and Incompetent. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.
43.
RockmanBert A. 1984. The Leadership Question: The Presidency and the American System. New York: Praeger Publishers.
44.
RomeroVidal. 2005. “Commitment Problems and Divergent Interests: A Theory of Presidents and Their Parties.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University.
45.
RomeroVidal. 2011. “The Politics of Elite Punishment: Why Some Corrupt Presidents Are Prosecuted but Not Others?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA.
46.
RoseRichard. 1993. “Evaluating Presidents.” In Researching the Presidency: Vital Questions, New Approaches, edited by EdwardsGeorge C.KesselJohn H.RockmanBert A., 453–83. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
47.
ShugartMatthew S.CareyJohn M.1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SimonDennis M. 2009. “Public Expectations of the President.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, edited by EdwardsGeorge C.HowellWilliam G., 135–59. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
SimontonDean Keith. 1981. “Presidential Greatness and Performance: Can We Predict Leadership in the White House?” Journal of Personality49:306–23.
50.
SkowronekStephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
ValadésDiego. 1998. El Control del Poder [The Control of Power]. México: UNAM, IIJ.
52.
VernonRaymond. 1966. El Dilema del Desarrollo de México [Mexico’s Development Dilemma]. Mexico: Editorial Diana.
53.
WatermanRichard W.RockmanBert A. 2008. “What is Presidential Leadership?” In Presidential Leadership: The Vortex of Power, edited by RockmanBert A.WatermanRichard W., 1–17. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
WeldonJeffrey. 1997. “The Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, edited by MainwaringScottShugartMathew S., 225–58. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
