As female candidates may face greater challenges in establishing their “qualifications” for office, coverage of their personal traits may be pernicious, because it tends to de-emphasize substantive qualifications. This study focuses on relative amounts of trait and issue coverage of contests with and without women candidates. We find that races with female candidates yield more coverage of traits than male versus male contests and races with female candidates are less likely to generate issue coverage than trait coverage. Candidate gender and office interact; female gubernatorial candidates are most likely to garner trait coverage and least likely to engender issue coverage.
AdamsWilliam C.1975. “Candidate Characteristics, Office of Election, and Voter Responses.” Experimental Study of Politics4:76–91.
2.
AdaySeanDevittJames. 2001. “Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid.” Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics6 (2): 52–73.
3.
AldrichJohn H.1992. “Presidential Campaigns in Party- and Candidate-Centered Eras.” In Under the Watchful Eye: Managing Presidential Campaigns in the Television Era, edited by McCubbinsMathew D.59–82. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4.
AlexanderDeborahAndersenKristi. 1993. “Gender As a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly46:527–45.
5.
ArnoldR. Douglas. 2004. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
7.
BishinBenjamin G.StevensDanielWilsonChristian. 2006. “Character Counts? Honesty and Fairness in Election 2000.” Public Opinion Quarterly70:235–48.
8.
BradleyAmy M.WicksRobert H.2011. “A Gendered Blogosphere? Portrayal of Sarah Palin on Political Blogs during the 2008 Presidential Campaign.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly88 (4): 807–20.
9.
BystromDianne G.2010. “Advertising, Web Sites, and Media Coverage: Gender and Communication along the Campaign Trail.” In Gender and Elections, edited by CarrollSusan J.FoxRichard L.2nd ed., 239–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BystromDianne G.BanwartMary ChristineKaidLynda LeeRobertsonTerry A.2004. Gender and Candidate Communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, and NewsStyle. New York: Routledge.
11.
BystromDianne G.RobertsonTerry A.BanwartMary Christine. 2001. “Framing the Fight: An Analysis of Media Coverage of Female and Male Candidates in Primary Races for Governor and US Senate in 2000.” American Behavioral Scientist44 (12): 1999–2012.
12.
CarrollSusan J.2009. “Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic.” Politics & Gender5:1–20.
13.
DolanKathleen A.2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14.
DolanKathleen A.2008. “Running against a Woman: Do Female Opponents Shape Male Candidate Behaviors?” Social Science Quarterly89 (3): 756–79.
15.
DruckmanJames N.2005. “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication22:463–81.
16.
Duerst-LahtiGeorgia. 2006. “Presidential Elections: Gendered Space and the Case of 2004.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, edited by CarrollSusanFoxRichard12–42. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DunawayJohanna. 2008. “Markets, Ownership, and the Quality of Campaign News Coverage.” Journal of Politics70 (4): 1–10.
18.
FalkErika. 2008. Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19.
FalkErikaJamiesonKathleen Hall. 2003. “Changing the Climate of Expectations.” In Anticipating Madam President, edited by WatsonRobert P.GordonAnn43–52. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
20.
FalkErikaKenskiKate. 2006a. “Issue Saliency and Gender Stereotypes: Support for Women As Presidents in Times of War and Terrorism.” Social Science Quarterly87 (1): 1–18.
21.
FalkErikaKenskiKate. 2006b. “Sexism versus Partisanship: A New Look at the Question of Whether America Is Ready for a Woman President.” Sex Roles54:413–28.
22.
Farrar-MyersVictoria A.2003. “A War Chest Full of Susan B. Anthony Dollars: Fund-Raising Issues for Female Presidential Candidates.” In Anticipating Madam President, edited by WatsonRobert P.GordonAnn81–94. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
23.
Farrar-MyersVictoria A.2007. “Money and the Art and Science of Candidate Viability.” In Rethinking Madam President: Are We Ready for a Woman in the White House? edited by HanLori CoxHeldmanCaroline113–32. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
24.
Farrar-MyersVictoria A.BoyeaBrent D.2013. “Campaign Finance: A Barrier to Reaching the White House?” In Executive Women: Pathways and Performance, edited by RoseMelody209–29. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
25.
FinkelS. E.1993. “Reexamining the Minimal Effects Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics55 (1): 1–21.
26.
FlowersJulianneHaynesAudreyCrespinMichael. 2003. “The Media, the Campaign, and the Message.” American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 1540–49.
27.
FowlerLinda L.LawlessJennifer L.2009. “Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates.” Perspectives on Politics7 (3): 519–37.
28.
FoxRichard L.1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
29.
FoxRichard L.2000. “Gender and Congressional Elections.” In Gender and American Politics, edited by Tolleson-RinehartSJosephsonJ.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 227–256.
30.
GorenPaul. 2002. “Character Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluation.” American Journal of Political Science46:627–41.
31.
GorenPaul. 2007. “Character Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluations: Modifications and Extensions.” Political Behavior29:305–25.
32.
GraberDoris A.2001. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
33.
HadfieldJarrod D.2010. “MCMC Methods for Multiresponse Generalised Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package.” Journal of Statistical Software33 (2): 1–22.
34.
HadfieldJarrod D.2012. “MCMCglmm Course Notes.” Unpublished Manuscript, University of Edinburgh.
35.
HanLori CoxHeldmanCaroline, eds. 2007. Rethinking Madam President: Are We Ready for a Woman in the White House?Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
36.
HaneyWaltRussellMikeGulekCengizFierrosEd1988. “Drawing on Education: Using Student Drawings to Promote Middle School Improvement.” Schools in the Middle7 (3): 38–43.
37.
HayesDanny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 908–23.
38.
HayesDanny. 2008. “Party Reputations, Journalistic Expectations: How Issue Ownership Influences Election News.” Political Communication25 (4): 377–400.
39.
HayesDanny. 2010a. “The Dynamics of Agenda Convergence and the Paradox of Competitiveness in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly63 (3): 594–611.
40.
HayesDanny. 2010b. “Trait Voting in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Politics Research38 (6): 1102–29.
41.
HeithDiane. 2003. “The Lipstick Watch: Media Coverage, Gender, and Presidential Campaigns.” In Anticipating Madam President, edited by WatsonRobert P.GordonAdd123–30. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
42.
HeldmanCarolineCarrollSusanOlsonStephanie. 2005. “‘She Brought Only a Skirt’: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication22 (3): 315–35.
43.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly46:503–25.
44.
HutchingsVincent L.1998. “Issue Salience and Support for Civil Rights Legislation among Southern Democrats.” Legislative Studies Quarterly23 (4): 521–44.
45.
IyengarShantoKinderDonald. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
IyengarShantoNorporthHelmutHahnKyu S.2004. “Consumer Demand for Election News: The Horserace Sells.” Journal of Politics66 (1): 157–75.
47.
IyengarShantoValentinoNicholas A.AnsolabehereStephenSimonAdam F.1997. “Running As a Woman: Gender Stereotyping in Women’s Campaigns.” In Women, Media, and Politics, edited by NorrisPippa, 77–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
JonesAlex. 2009. Losing the News: The Future of the News that Feeds Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
JustMarion R.CriglerAnn N.AlgerDean E.CookTimothy. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1991. “Senate Elections in the News: Examining Campaign Coverage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (3): 349–74.
51.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1994. “The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office.” Journal of Politics56 (1): 154–73.
52.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
53.
KahnKim FridkinGordonAnn. 1997. “How Women Campaign for U.S. Senate: Substance and Strategy.” In Women, Media, and Politics, edited by NorrisPippa59–76. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
KahnKim FridkinKenneyPatrick J.1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
55.
KahnKim FridkinKenneyPatrick J.2002. “The Slant of the News: How Editorial Endorsements Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens’ Views of Candidates.” The American Political Science Review96 (2): 386–94.
56.
KaplanMartinGoldsteinKenHaleMatthew. 2005. “Local News Coverage of the 2004 Campaigns: An Analysis of Nightly News Broadcasts.” A report for the Lear Center Local News Archive, A project of the USC Annenberg School and the University of Wisconsin.
57.
KingdonJohn W.1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
58.
LandisJ. RichardKochGary G.1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics33:159–74.
59.
LawlessJennifer L.FoxRichard L.2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
LawrenceRegina G.2000. “Game Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News.” Political Communication17 (2): 93–114.
61.
LawrenceRegina G.RoseMelody. 2009. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
62.
McCombsMaxwell E.ShawDonald L.1993. “The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas.” Journal of Communication43 (2): 58–67.
63.
MuellerCarol. 1986. “Nurturance and Mastery: Competing Qualifications for Women’s Access to High Public Office?” Research in Politics and Society2, 211–232.
64.
PattersonThomas E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Press.
RosenstielTom. 2005. “Political Polling and the New Media Culture: A Case of More Being Less.” Public Opinion Quarterly69:698–715.
70.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender & Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
71.
SapiroVirginia. 1981–1982. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology3 (1–2): 61–83.
72.
SchaffnerBrian F.2005. “Priming Gender: Campaigning on Women’s Issues in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science49:803–17.
73.
SigelmanLeeSigelmanCarol K.FowlerChristopher. 1987. “A Bird of a Different Feather? An Investigation of Physical Attractiveness and the Electability of Female Candidates.” Social Psychology Quarterly50:32–43.
74.
StegmuellerDaniel. 2013. “How Many Countries for Multilevel Modeling? A Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches.” American Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1111/ajps.12001.
75.
StemlerSteve. 2001. “An Overview of Content Analysis.” Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation7 (17). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
76.
Van der WurffRichard. 2008. “The Impact of the Internet on Media Content.” In The Internet and the Mass Media, edited by KungLucyPicardRobert G.TowseRuth65–85. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
77.
Van der WurffRichardLaufEdmund. 2005. Print and Online Newspapers in Europe: A Comparative Analysis in 16 Countries. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis Publishers.
78.
VinsonC. DanielleMooreWilliam V.2007. “The Campaign Disconnect: Media Coverage of the 2000 South Carolina Presidential Primary.” Political Communication24 (4): 393–413.
79.
WittLindaPagetKaren M.MatthewsGlenna. 1994. Running As a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: Free Press.
80.
WoodallGina SerigneseFridkinKim L.2003. Shaping Women’s Chances: Stereotypes and the Media. In Anticipating Madam President, edited by WatsonRobert P.GordonAnn69–86. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
