It is widely assumed that candidate issue convergence or “dialogue” is beneficial for voters in campaigns. Using a lagged weekly measure of issue convergence in political advertising about specific campaign issues from the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns, I show that dialogue, as it is currently defined by campaigns and elections scholars, is as likely to harm voters as it is to help them. These findings require scholars to think more deeply about what role, if any, issue convergence plays in deliberative campaigns.
AckermanBruceFishkinJames S.2005. Deliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AnsolabehereStephenIyengarShanto. 1997. Going Negative. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3.
ArnettRonaldGraysonCelesteMcDowellChristina. 2008. “Dialogue as an Enlarged Communicative Mentality: Review, Assessment, and Ongoing Difference.” Communication Research Trends27:3–25.
4.
BargeJ. Kevin. 2002. “Enlarging the Meaning of Group Deliberation: From Discussion to Dialogue.” In New Directions in Group Communication, edited by FreyL., 159–78. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
BartelsLarry. 2000. “Campaign Quality: Standards for Evaluation, Benchmarks for Reform.” In Campaign Reform: Insights and Evidence, edited by BartelsLarryVavreckLynn, 1–61. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
BuberMartin. 1965. Between Man and Man. New York: Routledge.
8.
BurkeRaymondSrullThomas. 1985. “Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Research15:55–68.
9.
BurkhalterStephanieGastilJohnKelshawTodd. 2002. “A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups.” Communication Theory12:398–422.
10.
CissnaKennethAndersonRob. 1994. “Communication and the Ground of Dialogue.” In The Reach of Dialogue: Confirmation, Voice, and Community, edited by AndersonRobCissnaKennethArnettRonald, 9–30. New York: Hampton Press.
11.
CohenJoshua. 1997. “Procedures and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by BohmanJamesRehgWilliam, 407–38. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
12.
DaltonRussell J.BeckPaul AllenHuckfeldtRobertKoetzleWilliam. 1998. “A Test of Media-Centered Agenda Setting: Newspaper Content and Public Interests in a Presidential Election.” Political Communication15:463–81.
13.
DryzekJohn S.2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
DryzekJohn S.2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
FarnsworthStephen J.LichterS. Robert. 2007. The Nightly News Nightmare: Network Television’s Coverage of U.S. Presidential Elections, 1988–2004. 2nd ed.New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
16.
FishkinJames S.1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
FishkinJames S.1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
FranzMichaelFreedmanPaulGoldsteinKennethRidoutTravis. 2007. Campaign Advertising and American Democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
19.
FranzMichaelRidoutTravis. 2007. “Does Political Advertising Persuade?”Political Behavior29:465–91.
20.
FreedmanPaulFranzMichaelGoldsteinKenneth. 2004. “Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science48:723–74.
21.
FungArchon. 2003. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy11:338–67.
22.
GastilJohn. 1993. Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision-Making, and Communication. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.
23.
GastilJohn. 2000. By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley: University of California.
24.
GastilJohn. 2007. Political Communication and Deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
GerberAlan S.GimpelJames G.GreenDonald P.ShawDaron R.2011. “How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review105 (1): 135–50.
26.
GutmannAmyThompsonDennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
HayesDanny. 2010. “The Dynamics of Agenda Convergence and the Paradox of Competitiveness in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly63:594–611.
28.
HuberGregory A.ArceneauxKevin. 2007. “Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science51:957–77.
29.
IyengarShantoSoodGauravLelkesYphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly76:405–31.
30.
JohannesenRichard. 1971. “The Emerging Concept of Communication as Dialogue.” Quarterly Journal of Speech57:373–82.
31.
JustMarion R.CriglerAnn N.AlgerDean E.CookTimothy E.KernMontagueWestDarrell M.1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
KaplanNoahParkDavidRidoutTravis. 2006. “Dialogue in American Political Campaigns? An Examination of Issue Convergence in Candidate Television Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science50:724–36.
33.
KellerKevin Lane. 1987. “Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Research14:316–33.
34.
KelleyStanley.Jr.1960. Political Campaigning: Problems of Creating an Informed Electorate. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
35.
KentRobertAllenChris. 1994. “Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity.” Journal of Marketing58:97–105.
36.
LauRichardRedlawskDavid. 2008. “Older but Wiser? Effects of Age on Political Cognition.” Journal of Politics70:168–85.
37.
LipsitzKeena. 2011. Competitive Elections and the American Voter. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
38.
LodgeMiltonSteenbergenMarco R.BrauShawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review89:309–26.
39.
MutzDiane. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40.
NemethCharlan. 1995. “Dissent as Driving Cognition, Attitudes, and Judgments.” Social Cognition13:273–91.
41.
ParkinsonJohn. 2006. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
ParkinsonJohnMansbridgeJane. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PetrocikJohnBenoitWilliamHansenGlenn. 2003. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952-2000.” Political Science Quarterly118:599–626.
44.
PriceVincentCappellaJosephNirLilach. 2002. “Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?”Political Communication19:95–112.
45.
RawlsJohn. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
RidoutTravisShahDhavanGoldsteinKennethFranzMichael. 2004. “Evaluating Measures of Campaign Advertising Exposure on Political Learning.” Political Behavior26:201–25.
47.
ShawDaron. 2006. Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
SigelmanLeeBuellEmmett H.Jr.2004. “Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–2000.” American Journal of Political Science48:650–61.
49.
SimonAdam F.2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WarrenMarkPearseHilary. 2008. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WichowskyAmber. 2008. “Let’s Get Serious: Ads, Issues, Knowledge and Engagement in Congressional Elections.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
52.
YoungIris Marion. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by BenhabibSeyla, 120–35. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
