This study explores what effect different campaign information frames have on voters’ evaluations of Sarah Palin using data from an online experiment. We show that descriptions highlighting more stereotypically feminine attributes cause individuals to perceive Palin as holding more feminine traits, while those highlighting more masculine attributes lead to higher assessments of her masculine traits. Those that mix feminine and masculine attributes lead to higher assessments of Palin’s masculine traits and null effects on her feminine traits. We show that Palin benefits the most in overall evaluations by being perceived as high on both masculine and feminine traits.
BanwartMary Christine. 2010. “Gender and Candidate Communication: Effects of Stereotypes in the 2008 Election.” American Behavioral Scientist54 (3): 265–283.
2.
BriansCraig Leonard. 2005. “Women for Women?” American Politics Research33 (3): 357–75.
3.
BurrellBarbara. 1994. A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
BystromDiane. 2010. “18 Million Cracks in the Glass Ceiling: The Rise and Fall of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Presidential Campaign.” In Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office, edited by MurrayRainbow, 69–90. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
5.
BystromDianneRobertsonTerryBanwartMary Christine. 2001. “Framing the Fight: An Analysis of Media Coverage of Female and Male Candidates in Primary Races for Governor and US Senate in 2000.” American Behavioral Scientist44 (12): 1999–2013.
6.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1960. The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Midway Reprint, 1980).
7.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science10:103–26.
8.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames. 2010. “Identifying Frames in Political News.” In Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, edited by BucyErik P.HolbertR. Lance, 1st ed, 238–67. New York: Routledge Press.
9.
DevittJames. 2002. “Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Female Gubernatorial Candidates and the Press.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly79 (2): 445–63.
10.
DolanKathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 272–93.
11.
DolanKathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior32:69–88.
12.
DolanKathleen. 2011. “Evaluating Women Candidates: The Impact of Political Gender Stereotypes on Vote Choice in the 2010 Midterm Elections.” Presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, Washington, September 1-4.
13.
Duerst-LahtiGeorgia. 2008. “‘Seeing What Has Always Been’: Opening Study of the Presidency.” Political Science & Politics41 (4): 733–7.
14.
EaglyAlice H.CarliLinda. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.
15.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteven J.2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review109 (3): 573.
16.
FoxRichardOxleyZoe. 2003. “Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success.” Journal of Politics65 (3): 833–50.
17.
FridkinKim L.KenneyPatrick J.2011. “The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics73 (1): 61–73.
18.
HansenSusanOteroLaura. 2006. “A Woman for US President? Gender and Leadership Traits Before and After 9/11.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy28:35–60.
19.
HayesDanny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 908–23.
20.
HuddyLeonieCapelosTheresa. 2002. “Gender Stereotyping and Candidate Evaluation.” In The Social Psychology of Politics Part I, edited by Ottati, et alVictor C.., 29–53. New York: Springer.
21.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993a. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119–47.
22.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993b. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 503–25.
23.
IyengarShanto. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1992. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of US Senate Candidates.” The Journal of Politics54 (2): 497–517.
25.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1994. “Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science38 (1): 162–95.
26.
KahnKim FridkinKenneyPatrick J.2002. “The Slant of the News: How Editorial Endorsements Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens’ Views of Candidates.” American Political Science Review96 (2): 381–94.
27.
KingDavidMatlandRichard. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party.” American Politics Research31 (6): 595–612.
28.
KochJeffrey W.2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” Journal of Politics62 (2): 414–29.
29.
KochJeffrey W.2003. “Being Certain versus Being Right: Citizen Certainty and Accuracy of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” Political Behavior25 (3): 221–46.
30.
LawlessJennifer L.2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 479–90.
31.
LawrenceRegina G.RoseMelody. 2009. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publications.
32.
LenzGabriel S.2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 821–37.
33.
MatlandRichard E.KingDavid C.2002. “Women as Candidates in Congressional Elections.” In Women Transforming Congress, edited by RosenthalCindy Simon, 119–45. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
34.
McDermottMonika. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
35.
MillerMelissaPeakeJeffreyBoultonBrittany Anne. 2010. “Testing the Saturday Night Live Hypothesis: Fairness and Bias in Newspaper Coverage of Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign.” Politics & Gender6 (2): 169–98.
36.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 20–34.
37.
SanbonmatsuKiraDolanKathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly62 (3): 485.
38.
WinterNicholas. 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior32:587–618.
39.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
