How are legislative outcomes shaped by multidimensional negotiations? Examining the legislative politics of U.S. immigration reforms, I show how alternating coalitions in multidimensional negotiations produce centrist legislative outcomes. In doing so, this article sheds light on a puzzling aspect of immigration policy—namely, the gap that exists between public opinion and legislative outcomes. My investigation of major immigration bills in 1986, 1996, and 2006 shows that the multidimensional nature of immigration debates contributed to the lack of dramatic reforms, by allowing legislative minorities to form alternating coalitions to block any dramatic changes.
ArnoldR. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2.
BaileyMichael. 2001. “Quiet Influence: The Representation of Diffuse Interests on Trade Policy, 1983-1994.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26 (1): 45-80.
3.
BiancoWilliamJeliazkovIvanSenedItai. 2004. “The Uncovered Set and the Limits of Legislative Action.” Political Analysis12 (3): 256-76.
4.
BiancoWilliamLynchMichaelMillerGarySenedItai. 2006. “A Theory Waiting to Be Discovered and Used: A Reanalysis of Canonical Experiments on Majority Rule Decision-Making.” Journal of Politics68 (4): 838-51.
5.
BiancoWilliamLynchMichaelMillerGarySenedItai. 2008. “The Constrained Instability of Majority Rule: Experiments on the Robustness of the Uncovered Set.” Political Analysis16 (2): 115-37.
6.
BiancoWilliamSenedItai. 2005. “Uncovering Evidence of Conditional Party Government: Reassessing Majority Party Influence in Congress and State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review99 (3): 361-71.
7.
BriggsVernon. 1996. Mass Immigration and the National Interest. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
8.
BriggsVernon. 2001. Immigration and American Unionism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
9.
BurnsPeterGimpelJames. 2000. “Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy.” Political Science Quarterly115 (2): 201-25.
CitrinJackGreenDonaldMusteChristopherWongCara. 1997. “Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics59 (3): 858-81.
12.
ClintonJoshuaMeirowitzAdam. 2004. “Testing Explanations of Strategic Voting in Legislatures: A Reexamination of the Compromise of 1790.” American Journal of Political Science48 (4): 675-89.
13.
CorneliusWayneRosenblumMarc. 2005. “Immigration and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science8:99-119.
14.
CorneliusWayneTsudaTakeyukiMartinPhilipHollifieldJames. 2004. Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
15.
CoxGary. 1987. “The Uncovered Set and the Core.” American Journal of Political Science31 (2): 408-22.
16.
CrespinMichaelRohdeDavid. 2010. “Dimensions, Issues, and Bills: Appropriations Voting on the House Floor.” Journal of Politics74 (4): 976-89.
17.
DenzauArthurMungerMichael. 1986. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review80 (1): 89-106.
18.
FacchiniGiovanniMaydaAnna. 2008. “From Individual Attitudes towards Migrants to Migration Policy Outcomes: Theory and Evidence.” Economic Policy56:651-713.
19.
FacchiniGiovanniSteinhardtMax. 2011. “What Drives U.S. Immigration Policy? Evidence from Congressional Roll Call Votes.” Journal of Public Economics95:734-43.
20.
FreemanGary. 1995. “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States.” International Migration Review29 (4): 881-902.
21.
FreemanGary. 2001. “Client Politics or Populism: Immigration Reform in the United States.” In Controlling a New Migration World, edited by GuiraudonV.JoppkeC., 65-95. New York: Routledge.
22.
GimpelJamesEdwardsJames. 1999. The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
HainmuellerJensHiscoxMichael. 2007. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe.” International Organization61 (2): 399-441.
24.
HallRichardWaymanFrank. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review84 (3): 797-820.
25.
HammarTomas. 1985. European Immigration Policy: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HansonGordonScheveKennethSlaughterMatthew. 2007. “Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies.” Economics & Politics19 (1): 1-33.
27.
HaubertJeanieFussellElisabeth. 2006. “Explaining Pro-immigrant Sentiment in the U.S.: Social Class, Cosmopolitanism, and Perceptions of Immigrants.” International Migration Review40:489-507.
28.
HausLeah. 1995. “Openings in the Wall: Transnational Migrants, Labor Unions, and U.S. Immigration Policy.” International Organization49 (2): 285-313.
29.
JeongGyung-Ho. 2008. “Testing the Predictions of the Multidimensional Spatial Voting Model with Roll Call Data.” Political Analysis16 (2): 179-96.
30.
JeongGyung-HoMillerGarySenedItai. 2009. “Closing the Deal: Negotiating Civil Rights Legislation.” American Political Science Review103 (4): 588-606.
31.
JoppkeChristian. 1998. “Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration.” World Politics50 (2): 266-93.
32.
KofordKenneth. 1989. “Dimensions in Congressional Voting.” American Political Science Review83 (3): 949-62.
33.
LaxJeffreyPhillipsJustin. 2009. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 107-21.
MaydaAnna. 2006. “Who Is against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes towards Immigrants.” The Review of Economics and Statistics88 (3): 510-30.
36.
McKelveyRichard. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory12 (3): 472-82.
37.
McKelveyRichard. 1986. “Covering Dominance and Institution Free Properties of Social Choice.” American Journal of Political Science30 (2): 283-314.
38.
McKelveyRichardOrdeshookPeter. 1983. “Some Experimental Results that Fail to Support the Competitive Solution.” Public Choice40 (3): 281-91.
39.
MillerNicholas. 1980. “A New Solution Set for Tournament and Majority Voting.” American Journal of Political Science24 (1): 68-96.
40.
O’RourkeKevinSinnottRichard. 2006. “The Determinants of Individual Attitudes towards Immigration.” European Journal of Political Economy22 (4): 838-61.
41.
ParkDavidGelmanAndrewBafumiJoseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis12 (4): 375-85.
42.
PooleKeithRosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
PooleKeithRosenthalHowardKofordKenneth. 1991. “On Dimensionalizing Roll Call Votes in the U.S. Congress.” American Political Science Review85 (3): 955-76.
44.
RikerWilliam H.1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
45.
RuhsMartinMartinPhilip. 2008. “Numbers vs. Rights: Trade-Offs and Guest Worker Programs.” International Migration Review42 (1): 249-65.
46.
ScheveKennethSlaughterMatthew. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” The Review of Economics and Statistics83 (1): 133-45.
47.
SchofieldNorman. 1978. “Instability of Simple Dynamic Games.” Review of Economic Studies45 (3): 575-94.
48.
ShepsleKenneth A.1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science23:27-59.
49.
ShepsleKenneth A.WeingastBarry. 1984. “Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science28 (1): 49-74.
50.
TalbertJefferyPotoskiMatthew. 2002. “Setting the Legislative Agenda: The Dimensional Structure of Bill Cosponsoring and Floor Voting.” Journal of Politics64 (3): 864-91.
TichenorDaniel J.2002. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
53.
WattsJulie R.2002. Immigration Policy and the Challenge of Globalization: Unions and Employers in Unlikely Alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
54.
WongCarolyn. 2006. Lobbying for Inclusion: Rights Politics and the Making of Immigration Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
55.
WrightJohn R.1990. “Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review84 (2): 417-38.
56.
ZolbergAristide. 1990. “Reforming the Back Door: The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 in Historical Perspective.” In Immigration Reconsidered: History, Sociology, and Politics, edited by Yans-McLaughlinVirginia, 315-339. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
