The standard explanation for increasing party polarization in Congress is based on factors that would affect all policy issues simultaneously. We show that this has not happened. We examine the dimensionality of legislative choice in the House of Representatives, scaling eighteen issues in each Congress from 1965 through 2004. We detect considerable variability in issue dimensionality, an evolution in the structure of choice over time, and changes in the relationship between party unity and issue dimensionality. Our findings suggest that polarization has occurred on an issue-by-issue basis, reinvigorating the debate over the role of policy substance in shaping congressional politics.
AldrichJohn. 1995. Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.2009. Agendas and instability in American politics. 2nd edition.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1989. Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4.
CattellR. B.1966. “The Scree test for the number of factors.” Multivariate Behavioral Research1: 245-76.
5.
ClausenAage. 1973. How congressmen decide. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
6.
ClausenAageCheneyRichard B.1970. A comparative analysis of Senate and House voting on economic and welfare policy, 1953-1964. American Political Science Review64 (1): 138-52.
7.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMatthew D.2005. Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CrespinMichaelRohdeDavid W.2010. “Dimensions, issues, and bills: Appropriations voting on the House floor.” Journal of Politics72 (4): 976-89.
9.
DeeringChristopherSmithSteven. 1997. Committees in Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10.
HeckmanJames J.SnyderJames M.1997. Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. RAND Journal of Economics28:S142-89.
11.
HurwitzMark S.MoilesRoger J.RohdeDavid W.2001. Distributive and partisan issues in agriculture policy in the 104th house. American Political Science Review95:911-22.
12.
JacksonJohnKingdonJohn. 1992. Ideology, interest group scores, and legislative votes. American Journal of Political Science36:805-23.
13.
JochimAshley E.2012. If you can’t win, join ’em: Bipartisanship in a polarized age. CAPPP working paper. Seattle: Center for American Politics and Public Policy, University of Washington.
14.
KingdonJohn. 1977. Models of legislative voting. Journal of Politics39: 563-95.
15.
KrutzGlen S.2001. Tactical maneuvering on omnibus bills in Congress. American Journal of Political Science45:220-33.
16.
LeeFrancis2009. Beyond ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
MacRaeDuncanJr.1965. A method for identifying issues and factions from legislative roll call votes. American Political Science Review59:909-26.
18.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Boston: MIT Press.
19.
PolsbyNelson. 2004. How Congress evolves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
PooleKeith T.2005. Spatial models of parliamentary voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
PooleKeithLewisJeffreyLoJamesCarrollRoyce. 2011. Scaling roll call votes with wnominate in R.” Journal of Statistical Software42 (14): 1-20.
22.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A political economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2001. D-Nominate after Ten Years. Legislative Studies Quarterly26:5-29.
24.
PotoskiMatthewTalbertJeffery. 2000. The dimensional structure of policy outputs: Distributive policy and roll call voting. Political Research Quarterly53 (4): 695-710.
25.
RobertsJason M.SmithSteven S.2003. Procedural contexts, party strategy, and conditional party voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971-2000. American Journal of Political Science47:305-17.
26.
RobertsJason M.SmithSteven S.HaptonstahlStephen R.2008. The dimensionality of congressional voting reconsidered. Prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
27.
RohdeDavid W.1991. Parties and leaders in the post-reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
RohdeDavid W.2004. Roll call voting data for the United States House of Representatives, 1953-2004. Compiled by the Political Institutions and Public Choice Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, IL.
29.
ShafranJoBeth. 2011. Unpredictability in legislative decision-making. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. March 31-April 3.
30.
SinclairBarbara. 1978. From party voting to regional fragmentation. American Politics Research6 (2): 125-146.
31.
SinclairBarbara. 1982. Congressional Realignment, 1925-1978. Austin: University of Texas Press.
32.
SmithSteven S.1989. Call to order: Floor politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
SmithSteven S.2007. Party influence in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
SnyderJames M.Jr.1992. Committee power, structure-induced equilibria, and roll call votes. American Journal of Political Science36 (1): 1-30.
35.
SteinRobert M.BickersKenneth N.1995. Perpetuating the pork barrel: Policy subsystems and American democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
StonecashJeffrey M.BrewerMark D.MarianiMack D.2003. Diverging parties: Social change, realignment, and political polarization. Westview Press.
37.
TalbertJeffery C.PotoskiMatthew. 2002. Setting the legislative agenda: The dimensional structure of bill cosponsoring and floor voting. Journal of Politics64:864-91.
38.
TheriaultSean M.2008. Party polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ThorpeRebecca U.2010. The role of economic reliance in defense procurement contracting. American Politics Research38 (4): 636-75.
40.
TurnerJulius. 1952. Party and constituency: Pressures on Congress. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
41.
WildavskyAaron. 1979. Speaking truth to power. Boston: Little, Brown.
42.
WilsonJames Q.1979. American politics, then and now. Commentary, February, 39-46.
