Lower transaction costs have shifted voter registration activities online and away from traditional modes of outreach. Downloading forms may impose higher transaction costs than traditional outreach for some people and thereby decrease electoral participation. A randomized, controlled experiment tested this hypothesis by encouraging treatment participants via e-mail to use online voter registration tools. The treatment group was 0.3 percentage points less likely to be registered to vote after the election. A follow-up experiment sent reminders via text message to randomly selected people who had downloaded registration forms. The treatment increased rates of registration by 4 percentage points, suggesting that reminders can ameliorate many of the negative effects of directing people to downloadable online registration forms.
AkerlofGeorge A.1991. Procrastination and obedience. American Economic Review81 (2): 1–19.
2.
AlvarezMichael RHopkinsAsaSinclairBetsy. 2010. Mobilizing Pasadena democrats: Measuring the effects of partisan campaign contacts. Journal of Politics72 (1): 31–44.
3.
ArceneauxKevinKolodnyRobin. 2009. Educating the least informed: Group endorsements in a grassroots campaign. American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 755–70.
4.
ArceneauxKevinNickersonDavid W.2009. Who is mobilized to vote? A re-analysis of seven randomized field experiments. American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 1–16.
5.
ArceneauxKevinNickersonDavid W.2010. Negative and positive campaign messages: Evidence from two field experiments. American Politics Research38 (1): 54–83.
6.
BendorJonathanDiermeierDanielTingMichael. 2003. A behavioral model of turnout. American Political Science Review97 (2): 261–80.
7.
BennionElizabeth A.2005. Caught in the ground wars: Mobilizing voters during a competitive congressional campaign. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science601:123–41.
8.
BennionElizabeth A.2009. I’ll register to vote if you teach me how: Results of a classroom-based field experiment. Indiana Journal of Political ScienceWinter 2008/2009:20–27.
9.
BradyHenry E.McNultyJohn E.2004. The costs of voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Palo Alto, CA.
10.
DaleAllisonStraussAaron. 2009. Don’t forget to vote: Text message reminders as a mobilization tool. American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 787–804.
11.
DommeyerCurt J.BaumPaulHannaRobert W.ChapmanKenneth S.2004. Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education9 (5): 611–623.
12.
DruckmanJames N.HennesseyCari LynnKiferMartinParkinMichael. 2010. Issue engagement on congressional candidate Web sites, 2002–2006. Social Science Computer Review28 (1): 3–23.
13.
DruckmanJames N.KiferMartin J.ParkinMichael. 2009. Campaign communications in US congressional elections. American Political Science Review103 (3): 343–66.
14.
EriksonRobert S.1981. Why do people vote? Because they are registered. American Politics Quarterly9 (3): 259–76.
FowlerJames H.2006. Habitual voting and behavioral turnout. Journal of Politics68 (2): 335–44.
17.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2000. The effects of canvassing, direct mail, and telephone contact on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review94 (3): 653–63.
18.
GerberAlanGreenDonald P.ShacharRon. 2003. Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science47 (3): 540–50.
19.
GreenDonald P.GerberAlan S.NickersonDavid W.2003. Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics65 (4): 1083–96.
20.
HanmerMichael J.2009. Discount voting: Registration reforms and their effects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HansenBen B.BowersJake. 2009. Attributing effects to a cluster randomized Get-Out-the-Vote campaign. Journal of the American Statistical Association104 (487): 873–85.
22.
Internet economics: A thinker’s guide. 2000. The Economist, April1, 64–66.
23.
KenneyMartinCurryJames. 2001. Beyond transaction costs: E-commerce and the power of the Internet dataspace. In Worlds of e-commerce: Economic, geographical and social dimensions, ed. LeinbachT.BrunnS., 45–65. New York: John Wiley.
24.
KruegerBrian S.2006. A comparison of conventional and Internet political mobilization. American Politics Research34 (6): 759–76.
25.
LayClarry H.1986. At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality20 (4): 474–95.
McNultyJohn E.2005. Phone-based GOTV: What’s on the line? Field experiments with varied partisan components, 2002-2003. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science601:41–65.
28.
McNultyJohn E.DowlingConor M.AriottiMargaret H.2009. Driving saints to sin: How increasing the difficulty of voting dissuades even the most motivated voters. Political Analysis17 (4): 435–55.
29.
MichelsonMelissa R.BedollaLisa GarcíaMcConnellMargaret A.2009. Heeding the call: The effect of targeted two-round phonebanks on voter turnout. Journal of Politics71 (4): 1549–63.
30.
NickersonDavid W.2006. Volunteer phone calls can increase turnout: Evidence from eight field experiments. American Politics Research34:271–92.
31.
NickersonDavid W.2007a. Does e-mail boost turnout?Quarterly Journal of Political Science2 (4): 369–79.
32.
NickersonDavid W.2007b. Quality is job one: Professional and volunteer voter mobilization calls. American Journal of Political Science51 (2): 269–82.
33.
NickersonDavid W.RogersTodd. 2010. Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychological Science21 (2): 194–99.
34.
NorrisPippa. 2003. Preaching to the converted? Pluralism, participation, and party websites. Party Politics9 (1): 21–45.
35.
O’DonoghueTedRabinMatthew. 2001. Choice and procrastination. Quarterly Journal of Economics116 (1): 121–60.
36.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2009. Street fight: The impact of a street sign campaign on voter turnout. Electoral Studies28 (2): 309–13.
37.
PlutzerE.2002. Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review96 (1): 41–56.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
40.
SchlozmanKayVerbaSidneyBradyHenry. 2004. Political equality: What do we know about it? In Social inequality, ed. NeckermanK.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
SolomonLaura J.RothblumEsther D.1984. Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology31 (4): 503–09.
42.
SquirePeverillWolfingerRaymond E.GlassDavid P.1987. Residential mobility and voter turnout. American Political Science Review81 (1): 45–65.
43.
TedescoJohn C.2006. Web interactivity and young adult political efficacy. In The Internet election: Perspectives on the Web in campaign 2004, ed. WilliamsA. P.TedescoJ. C., 187–202. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
TimponeRichard J.1998. Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review92 (1): 145–58.
45.
TykocinskiOrit E.RuffleBradley J.2003. Reasonable reasons for waiting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making16 (2): 147–57.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKayBradyHenry. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism and American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E.2004. Political equality: What do we know about it? In Social inequality, ed. NeckermanK. M., 635–66. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
49.
WattenbergMartin P.2007. Is voting for young people? With a postscript on citizen engagement. New York: Pearson Longman.
50.
WolfingerRaymond E.RosenstoneSteven J.1980. Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
