This article examines intersectional praxis via a focus on what constitutes relevant axes of difference. The author argues that a discussion of relevance should focus on two important issues: (1) which categories are of analytic importance and (2) those categories that activists consider relevant. This approach allows for activist debates over the most important social divisions in society while establishing some minimal number of axes that must be included to qualify activism as intersectional. In the Uruguayan case, gender and class constitute minimally important axes of difference; however, race and, less centrally, sexuality and ability constitute central points of debate.
Behrman, Jere E., Alejandro Gaviria, and Miguel Székely .2002. Social exclusion in Latin America: Introduction and overview. Research Network Working PaperR-445. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
2.
Berry, Jeffrey M.1997. The interest group society. White Plains, NY: Longman.
3.
Bredström, Anna.2006. Intersectionality: A challenge for HIV/ AIDS research ? European Journal of Women’s Studies13 (3): 229-43.
4.
Butler, Judith.1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity . New York: Routledge.
5.
Bystydzienski, Jill M., and Steven P. Schacht .2001. Introduction. In Forging radical alliances across difference: Coalition politics for the new millennium, ed. J. M. Bystydzienski and S. P. Schacht, 1-17. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
Canel, Eduardo.1992. Democratization and the decline of urban social movements in Uruguay: A political-institutional account. In The making of social movements in Latin America: Identity, strategy, and democracy, ed. A. Escobar and S. E. Alvarez, 276-90. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé.1995. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In Critical race theory: The writings that formed the movement, ed. K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, and K. Thomas , 357-83. New York: New Press.
8.
Dhamoon, Rita.2009. Identity/difference politics: How difference is produced and why it matters. Vancouver: UBC Press.
9.
Foster, Jill.1999. Discriminación contra los afrouruguayos. Montevideo, Uruguay: CLAEH.
10.
Frankenberg, Ruth.1993. White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
Gama.1997. Diagnóstico socioeconómico y cultural de la mujer afrouruguaya. Montevideo, Uruguay: Ediciones Mundo Afro.
12.
García Bedolla, Lisa.2007. Intersections of inequality: Understanding marginalization and privilege in the post-civil rights era. Politics & Gender3 (2): 232-48.
13.
Hancock, Ange-Marie.2004. The politics of disgust: The public identity of the "Welfare Queen." New York: New York University Press.
14.
Hancock, Ange-Marie.2007. When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics5 (1): 63-79.
15.
Hawkesworth, Mary.2006. Feminist inquiry: From political conviction to methodological innovation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
16.
Hula, Kevin.1995. Rounding up the usual suspects: Forging interest group coalitions in Washington. In Interest group politics, ed. A. J. Cigler and B. A. Loomis, 239-58. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
Jordan-Zachary, Julia S.2008. Black women, cultural images, and social policy. New York: Routledge.
18.
Klatch, Rebecca.1999. A generation divided: The new left, the new right, and the 1960s. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli.2005. Race, class, gender: Reclaiming baggage in fast travelling theories. European Journal of Women’s Studies12 (3): 249-65.
20.
Ludvig, Alice.2006. Differences between women? Intersecting voices in a female narrative. European Journal of Women’s's Studies13 (3): 245-58.
21.
McCall, Leslie.2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society30 (3): 1771-800.
22.
Pearce, Jenny.1980. Uruguay: Generals rule. London: Latin American Bureau.
23.
Perelli, Carina, and Juan Rial Roade .1992. Partidos políticos y democracia en el cono sur. Montevideo, Uruguay: Peitho.
24.
Phoenix, Ann, and Pamela Pattynama .2006. Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies13 (3): 187-92.
25.
Prins, Baukje.2006. Narrative accounts of origins: A blind spot in the intersectional approach? European Journal of Women’s Studies13 (3): 277-90.
26.
Simien, Evelyn.2006. Black feminist voices in politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Simien, Evelyn.2007. Doing intersectionality research: from conceptual issues to practical examples. Politics and Gender. 3 (2): 264-271.
28.
Strolovitch, Dara Z.2007. Affirmative advocacy: Race, class, and gender in interest group politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Townsend-Bell, Erica.2007. Identities matter: Identity politics, coalition possibilities and feminist organizing. PhD dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis.
30.
Townsend-Bell, Erica. 2009. Being true and being you: Race, gender, class, and the fieldwork experience . PS: Political Science and Politics42 (2): 311-14.
31.
Van Dyke, Nella.2003. Crossing movement boundaries: Factors that facilitate coalition protest by American college students, 1930-1990. Social Problems50 (2): 226-50.
32.
Verloo, Mieke.2006. Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and theEuropean Union. European Journal of Women and Politics13 (3): 211-28.
33.
Wade, Peter.1997. Race and ethnicity in Latin America. Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
34.
Weldon, S. Laurel.2006. The structure of intersectionality: A comparative politics of gender. Politics & Gender2 (2): 235-48.
35.
Whittier, Nancy.1995. Feminist generations: The persistence of the radical women’s movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36.
Yuval-Davis, Nira.2006a. Gender mainstreaming och intersektionalitet. Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrifts (Gender mainstreaming and intersectionality. Swedish Journal of Gender Studies). 2-3 (5): 19-30.
37.
Yuval-Davis, Nira.2006b. Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies13 (3): 193-209.
38.
Zald, Mayer N., and John D. McCarthy .1980. Social movement industries: Competition and cooperation among social movement organizations. In Vol. 3 of Research in social movements: Conflict and change, ed. L. Kriesberg, 1-20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
