Adcock, Robert, and David Collier.2001. Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review95 (3): 529-47.
2.
Beetham, David, ed. 1995. Defining and measuring democracy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver.2007. Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies26:90-107.
4.
Bogaards, Matthijs.2007. Elections, election outcomes, and democracy in southern Africa. Democratization14 (1): 73-91.
5.
Bollen, Kenneth A.1980. Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy . American Sociological Review45 (3): 370-90.
6.
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Pamela Paxton.2000. Subjective measures of liberal democracy . Comparative Political Studies33 (1): 55-86.
7.
Bowman, Kirk, Fabrice Lehoucq, and James Mahoney.2005. Measuring political democracy: Case expertise, data adequacy, and Central America. Comparative Political Studies38 (8): 939-70.
8.
Burkhart, Ross E.2010. Inequality data and explanations of democracy. Political Concepts 41, IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper Series . www.concepts-methods.org.
9.
Canache, Damarys, Jeffrey J. Mondak, and Mitchell A. Seligson .2001. Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly65 (4): 506-28.
10.
Casper, Gretchen, and Claudiu Tufis.2003. Correlation versus interchangeability: The limited robustness of empirical findings on democracy using highly correlated datasets. Political Analysis11 (2): 196-203.
11.
Chandra, Kanchan, and Steven Wilkinson .2008. Measuring the effect of "ethnicity ." Comparative Political Studies41 (4-5): 515-63.
12.
Cheibub, José Antonio, Jennifer Gandhi, and James Raymond Vreeland .Forthcoming. Democracy and dictatorship revisited . Public Choice142.
13.
Collier, David, and Robert Adcock.1999. Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts. Annual Review of Political Science2:537-65.
14.
Collier, David, and Steven Levitsky .1997. Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics49 (3): 430-51.
15.
Coppedge, Michael.2007. Thickening thin concepts: Issues in large-N data generation . In Regimes and democracy in Latin America: Theories and methods , ed. Gerardo L. Munck, 105-22. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
16.
Coppedge, Michael, Angel Alvarez, and Claudia Maldonado .2008. Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. Journal of Politics70 (3): 632-47.
17.
Eck, Kristine.2005. A beginner’s guide to conflict data: Finding and using the right dataset. Uppsala Conflict Data Program, UCDP Papers1, Uppsala, Sweden.
18.
Elkins, Zachary.2000. Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 287-94.
19.
Facello, Chiara.2008. How to measure political (dis)satisfaction? European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), Joint Sessions of Workshops , Rennes, France, April 11-16.
20.
Gandhi, Jennifer.2008. What are we missing? Electoral data in democracies and non-democracies. Political Concepts 26, IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper Series. www.concepts-methods.org.
21.
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Michael D. Ward .1997. Double take: A reexamination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (3): 361-83.
22.
Hadenius, Axel, and Jan Teorell .2005. Assessing alternative indices of democracy. Political Concepts 6, IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper Series. www.concepts-methods.org.
23.
Hawken, Angela, and Gerardo L. Munck .2009. Do you know your data? Measurement validity in corruption research. Unpublished typescript, Pepperdine University and University of Southern California, Malibu, CA, and Los Angeles.
24.
Herrera, Yoshiko M., and Devesh Kapur.2007. Improving data quality: Actors, incentives, and capabilities. Political Analysis15 (4): 365-86.
25.
Inkeles, Alex, ed. 1991. On measuring democracy: Its consequences and concomitants. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
26.
Jäckle, Sebastian.2008. Datasets for the analysis of government termination. European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), Joint Sessions of Workshops, Rennes, France, April 11-16.
27.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba.1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Kittel, Bernhard.2006. A crazy methodology? On the limits of macro-quantitative social science research. International Sociology21 (5): 647-77.
29.
Krueger, Alan B., and David D. Laitin.2004. "Misunderestimating" terrorism . Foreign Affairs83 (5): 8-13.
30.
Landman, Todd, and Julia Häusermann .2003. Map-making and analysis of the main international initiatives on developing indicators on democracy and good governance. Unpublished report, University of Essex, Human Rights Centre, and Statistical Office of the Commission of the European Union (Eurostat) . www.todd-landman.com.
31.
Laitin, David, and Daniel Posner.2001. The implications of constructivism for constructing ethnic fractionalization indices. APSA-CP Newsletter12 (1): 13-17.
32.
Lieberman, Evan S.2002. Taxation data as indicators of state-society relations: Possibilities and pitfalls in cross-national research. Studies in Comparative International Development36 (4): 89-115.
33.
Lieberman, Evan S.2010. Bridging in qualitative-quantitative divide: Best practices in the development of historically-oriented replication datasets. Annual Review of Political Science13.
34.
Mainwaring, Scott, Daniel Brinks, and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán.2001. Classifying political regimes in Latin America, 1945-1999. Studies in Comparative International Development36 (1): 37-65.
35.
Montero, José Ramón , Guillermo Cordero, María Celeste Ratto, and Gema García Albarcete.2008. Assessing independent variables in cross national datasets: The case of religiosity. European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), Joint Sessions of Workshops, Rennes, France, April 11-16.
36.
Munck, Gerardo L.2009. Measuring democracy: A bridge between scholarship and politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
Munck, Gerardo L., and Richard Snyder.2004. How the concepts we use and the way we measure them shape the world we see. Presented at American Political Science Association (APSA), 100th Annual Meeting, Chicago, September 2-5.
38.
Munck, Gerardo L., and Jay Verkuilen .2002. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies35 (1): 5-34.
39.
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio, and Jeffrey K. Staton .2008. Unpacking the rule of law: A review of judicial independence measures Political Concepts 21, IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper Series.. www.concepts-methods.org.
40.
Rivera, Mauricio.2010. Estudios sobre represión estatal en regímenes democráticos: Teorías, métodos, hallazgos y desafíos . Política y Gobierno17 (1): 59-95.
41.
Rohlfing, Ingo.2008. Do you know your data? Criteria for dataset quality. European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), Joint Sessions of Workshops, Rennes, France, April 11-16.
42.
Rubal, Martiño, and Mónica Ferrín .2008. Measuring trust and its determinants. European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), Joint Sessions of Workshops , Rennes, France, April 11-16.
43.
Schedler, Andreas.2009. Academic market failure: Data quality and availability in comparative politics. Working Paper 215, CIDE, Department of Political Studies, Mexico City.
44.
Schedler, Andreas.2012. The measurer’s dilemma: Coordination failures in cross-national political data collection. Comparative Political Studies45 (2): forthcoming.
45.
Schedler, Andreas, and Rodolfo Sarsfield .2007. Democrats with adjectives: Linking direct and indirect measures of democratic support. European Journal of Political Research46 (5): 637-59.
46.
Schneider, Aaron.2003. Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development38 (3): 32-56.
47.
Wilson, Sven E., and Daniel M. Butler.2007. A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications . Political Analysis15:101-23.
