This article systematically compares the efficiency of federal, state, and local civil rights agencies in enforcing national fair housing policy over time, with special attention to the South. State and local agencies processed Fair Housing Act complaints more efficiently than the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), southern agencies outperformed HUD, and the probability that a racial discrimination complaint resulted in a favorable outcome for the alleged victim was the same for complaints originating within and outside the South. These findings suggest that the fair housing enforcement model may provide useful concepts for sharing power in other policy areas in the American federal system.
Beer, Samuel H.1993. To make a nation: The rediscovery of American federalism . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bradford, David F., and Wallace E. Oates .1971. Towards a predictive theory of intergovernmental grants. American Economic Review61 (2): 440-48.
3.
Briggs, Xavier de Souza, ed. 2005. The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
4.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
5.
Bullock, Charles S., III, and Harrell R. Rodgers Jr.1976. Coercion to compliance: Southern school districts and school desegregation guidelines. Journal of Politics38 (4): 987-1011.
6.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson .1989. Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
7.
Chubb, John E.1985. The political economy of federalism. American Political Science Review79 (4): 994-1015.
8.
Crowder, Kyle, Scott J. South, and Erick Chavez.2006. Wealth, race, and inter-neighborhood migration. American Sociological Review71 (6): 72-94.
9.
Elazar, Daniel J.1962. The American partnership: Intergovernmental co-operation in the nineteenth-century United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Elazar, Daniel J.1972. American federalism: A view from the states. 2nd ed. New York: Crowell.
11.
Farley, Reynolds, and William H. Frey .1992. Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks during the 1980s: Small steps toward a more integrated society. Population Studies Center no. 92-257, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor .
12.
Farley, Reynolds, and William H. Frey .1994. Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks during the 1980s: Small steps toward a more integrated society. American Sociological Review59 (1): 23-45.
13.
Gatlin, Douglas S., Michael W. Giles, and Everett F. Cataldo .1978. Policy support within a target group: The case of school desegregation. American Political Science Review72 (3): 985-95.
14.
Green, Donald Philip, and Jonathan A. Cowden .1992. Who protests: Self-interest and white opposition to busing. Journal of Politics54 (2): 471-96.
15.
Grodzins, Morton.1966. The American system: A new view of government in the United States. Edited by Daniel J. Elizar.Chicago: Rand McNally.
16.
Grofman, Bernard, Lisa Handley, and Richard G. Niemi .1992. Minority representation and the quest for voting equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Hedge, David M., and Michael J. Scicchitano .1994. Regulating in space and time: The case of regulatory federalism. Journal of Politics56 (1): 134-53.
18.
Klarman, Michael J.2004. From Jim Crow to civil rights: The Supreme Court and the struggle for racial equality. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Lamb, Charles M.2005. Housing segregation in suburban America since 1960: Presidential and judicial politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Lamb, Charles M., and Eric M. Wilk . Forthcoming. Civil rights, federalism, and the administrative process: Favorable outcomes by federal, state, and local agencies in housing discrimination complaints. Public Administration Review.
21.
Logan, John R., Brian J. Stults, and Reynolds Farley .2004. Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: Two decades of change. Demography41 (1): 1-22.
22.
Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy A. Denton .1988. Suburbanization and segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. American Journal of Sociology94 (3): 592-626.
23.
Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy A. Denton .1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Orfield, Gary.1978. Must we bus? Segregated schools and national policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
25.
Peltason, J.W.1971. Fifty-eight lonely men: Southern federal judges and school desegregation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
26.
Rosenberg, Gerald N.2008. The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change?2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Rossell, Christine H., and Robert L. Crain .1982. The importance of political factors in explaining northern school desegregation. American Journal of Political Science26 (1): 772-96.
28.
Scheberle, Denise.2004. Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
Schwemm, Robert G.2009. Housing discrimination: Law and litigation. St. Paul, MN: Thompson West.
30.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.1994. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988: The enforcement report. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
31.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.1995. 1993 consolidated annual report to Congress on fair housing programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
32.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.1996. 1994 annual report to Congress on fair housing programs . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
33.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.1999. 1996 annual report to Congress on the state of fair housing in America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
34.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.2003. HUD strategic plan: FY 2003-FY 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
35.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.2005. Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity dataset. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (Obtained by the authors under a Freedom of Information Act request.)
36.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.2008. The state of fair housing: FY 2007 annual report on fair housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
37.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.2009. The state of fair housing: FY 2008 annual report on fair housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
38.
Walker, David B.2000. The rebirth of federalism: Slouching toward Washington . 2nd ed. Washington, DC : CQ Press.
39.
Wood, B. Dan.1991. Federalism and policy responsiveness: The clean air case . Journal of Politics53 (3): 851-59.
40.
Yinger, John.1995. Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
