The authors examine constituency changes induced by redistricting and ask three questions:What explains the amount of instability and uncertainty induced by redistricting? Does uncertainty affect legislators’ career choices? How do these changes affect election outcomes? The authors show that partisan redistricting plans are able to produce significant instability between elections, especially for opposing-party incumbents. Their findings have important implications for representation: through redistricting, strategic actors can disrupt the stability that many theorists would consider paramount for the operation of a democratic republic. The authors show that the effects of redistricting go beyond the simple examination of changes in each district’s underlying partisanship.
Abramowitz, Alan I.1983. Partisan redistricting and the 1982 congressional elections . Journal of Politics45:767-70.
2.
Alford, John, Holly Teeters, Daniel S. Ward, and Rick K. Wilson .1994. Overdraft: The political cost of congressional malfeasance. Journal of Politics56:788-801.
3.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Garrett Glasgow .2000. Two-stage estimation of nonrecursive choice models. Political Analysis8:147-65.
4.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr. , and Charles Stew-art III.2000. Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. American Journal of Political Science44:17-34.
5.
Bertelli, Anthony M., and Jamie L. Carson .2006. Constituency effects, redistricting, and representation in U.S. House elections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association , Philadelphia.
6.
Brunell, Thomas L.2006. Rethinking redistricting: How drawing uncompetitive districts eliminates gerrymanders, enhances representation, and improves attitudes toward congress. PS: Political Science and Politics39:77-86.
7.
Brunell, Thomas L.2008. Redistricting and competition: Why competitive elections are bad for America. New York: Routledge.
8.
Buchler, Justin.2005. Competition, representation and redistricting: The case against competitive congressional districts. Journal of Theoretical Politics17:431-63.
9.
Buchler, Justin.2007. The social sub-optimality of competitive elections. Public Choice133:439-56.
10.
Burden, Barry C.2005. Family feud in Massachusetts: How intraparty dynamics influence redistricting. In Redistricting in the new millennium , ed. Peter F. Galderisi, 245-60. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
11.
Burden, Barry C.2007. Personal roots of representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Butler, David, and Bruce E. Cain .1992. Congressional redistricting: Comparative and theoretical perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
13.
Cain, Bruce E.1984. The reapportionment puzzle. Berkeley : University of California Press.
14.
Cain, Bruce E.1985. Assessing the partisan effects of redistricting. American Political Science Review79:320-33.
15.
Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina .1987. The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Carson, Jamie L.2005. Strategy, selection, and candidate competition in U.S. House and Senate elections. Journal of Politics67:1-28.
17.
Carson, Jamie L., and Michael H. Crespin .2004. The effect of state redistricting methods on electoral competition in United States House of Representatives races. State Politics and Policy Quarterly4:455-69.
18.
Carson, Jamie L., Michael H. Crespin, Charles J. Finocchiaro, and David W. Rohde .2007. Redistricting and party polarization in the U.S. House of representatives. American Politics Research35:878-904.
19.
Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz .2002. Elbridge Gerry’s salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Crespin, Michael H.2005. Using geographic information systems to measure district change, 2000-2002. Political Analysis13:253-60.
21.
Dahl, Robert A.1971. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Desposato, Scott W., and John R. Petrocik .2003. The variable incumbency advantage: New voters, redistricting, and the personal vote. American Journal of Political Science47:18-32.
23.
Eckstein, Harry.1975. Case study and theory in political science. In Strategies of inquiry, ed. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, 79-137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Fenno, Richard F., Jr.2000. Congress at the grassroots: Representational change in the South, 1970-1998. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
25.
Fenno, Richard F., Jr.2007. Congressional travels: Places, connections, and authenticity. New York: Pearson /Longman.
26.
Galderisi, Peter F., and Bruce Cain.2005. Introduction: Redistricting past, present, and future. In Redistricting in the new millennium, ed. Peter F. Galderisi, 3-16. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
27.
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King.1994. Enhancing democracy through legislative redistricting. American Political Science Review88:541-59.
28.
Gerber, Alan.1998. Estimating the effect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. American Political Science Review92:401-11.
29.
Glazer, Amihai, Bernard Grofman, and Marc Robbins.1987. Partisan and incumbency effects of 1970s congressional redistricting. American Journal of Political Science31:680-707.
30.
Grofman, Bernard, and Thomas L. Brunell .2005. The art of the dummymander: The impact of recent redistrictings on the partisan makeup of Southern house seats. In Redistricting in the new millennium, ed. Peter. F. Galderisi, 183-200. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
31.
Groseclose, Timothy, and Keith Krehbiel.1994. Golden parachutes, rubber checks, and strategic retirements from the 102d House. American Journal of Political Science38:75-99.
32.
Hall, Richard L., and Robert P. Van Houweling1995. Avarice and ambition in Congress: Representatives’ decisions to run or retire from the U.S. House. American Political Science Review89:121-36.
33.
Hayes, Danny, and Seth C. McKee .2009. The Participatory Effects of Redistricting. American Journal of Political Science53:1006-23.
34.
Hetherington, Marc J., Bruce Larson, and Suzanne Globetti .2003. The redistricting cycle and strategic candidate decisions in U.S. House races. Journal of Politics65:1221-34.
35.
Hibbing, John R.1982. Voluntary retirements from the House in the twentieth century. Journal of Politics44:1020-34.
36.
Hirsch, Sam.2003. The United States House of Unrepresentatives: What went wrong in the latest round of congressional redistricting. Election Law Journal2:179-216.
37.
Hood, M.V., III, and Seth C. McKee. 2008. Gerrymandering on Georgia’s mind: The effects of redistricting on vote choice in the 2006 midterm election. Social Science Quarterly8:60-77.
38.
Jacobson, Gary C.1987. The marginals never vanished: Incumbency and competition in elections in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82. American Journal of Political Science31:126-41.
39.
Jacobson, Gary C.2003. Terror, terrain, and turnout: Explaining the 2002 midterm elections. Political Science Quarterly118:1-22.
40.
Jacobson, Gary C.2005. All quiet on the western front: Redistricting and party competition in California House elections. In Redistricting in the new millennium, ed. Peter F. Galderisi , 217-244. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
41.
Jacobson, Gary C.2006. Competition in U.S. congressional elections. In The marketplace of democracy: Electoral competition and American politics , ed. Michael P. McDonald and John Samples, 27-52. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and Cato Institute.
42.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Michael A. Dimock .1994. Checking out: The effects of bank overdrafts on the 1992 House elections. American Journal of Political Science38:601-24.
43.
Lublin, David, and Michael P. McDonald .2006. Is it time to draw the line? The impact of redistricting on competition in state House elections. Election Law Journal5:144-57.
44.
Lyons, Michael, and Peter F. Galderisi .1995. Incumbency, reapportionment, and U.S. House redistricting. Political Research Quarterly48:857-71.
45.
Maisel, L. Sandy, Cherie D. Maestas, and Walter J. Stone .2005. The impact of redistricting on candidate emergence. In Party lines: Competition, partisanship, and congressional redistricting, ed. Thomas E. Mann and Bruce E. Cain, 31-50. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
46.
Mansbridge, Jane.2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review97:515-28.
47.
Mayhew, David R.1974. Congressional elections: The case of the vanishing marginals . Polity6:295-317.
48.
McDonald, Michael P.2004. A comparative analysis of redistricting institutions in the United States, 2001-02. State Politics and Policy Quarterly4:371-95.
49.
McDonald, Michael P.2006. Redistricting and competitive districts. In The marketplace of democracy: Electoral competition and American politics , ed. Michael P. McDonald and John Samples, 222-44. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and Cato Institute.
50.
McDonald, Michael P., and John Samples.2006. The marketplace of democracy: Normative and empirical issues. In The marketplace of democracy: Electoral competition and American politics, ed. Michael P. McDonald and John Samples, 1-24. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and Cato Institute .
51.
McKee, Seth C.2008a. The effects of redistricting on voting behavior in incumbent U.S. House elections, 1992-1994. Political Research Quarterly61:122-33.
52.
McKee, Seth C.2008b. Redistricting and familiarity with U.S. House candidates . American Politics Research36:962-79.
53.
McKee, Seth C., and Daron R. Shaw .2005. Redistricting in Texas: Institutionalizing Republican ascendancy. In Redistricting in the new millennium , ed. Peter F. Galderisi, 275-312. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
54.
Murphy, Chad, and Antoine Yoshinaka .2009. Are mapmakers able to target and protect congressional incumbents? The institutional dynamics of electoral competition. American Politics Research37:955-82.
55.
Niemi, Richard G., and Alan I. Abramowitz .1994. Partisan redistricting and the 1992 congressional elections. Journal of Politics56:811-17.
56.
Nutting, Brian, and David Hawkins.2003. Politics in America 2004: The 108th Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press .
57.
Owen, Guillermo, and Bernard Grofman .1988. Optimal partisan gerrymandering . Political Geography7:5-22.
58.
Petrocik, John R., and Scott W. Desposato .1998. The partisan consequences of majority-minority redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994. Journal of Politics60:613-33.
59.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel.1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley : University of California Press.
60.
Rehfeld, Andrew.2005. The concept of constituency: Political representation, democratic legitimacy, and institutional design. New York : Cambridge University Press.
61.
Rivers, Douglas, and Quang H. Vuong .1988. Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal of Econometrics39:347-66.
62.
Rush, Mark E.1992. The variability of partisanship and turnout: Implications for gerrymandering analysis and representation theory. American Politics Quarterly20:99-122.
63.
Rush, Mark E.1993. Does redistricting make a difference? Partisan representation and electoral behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
64.
Rush, Mark E.2000. Redistricting and partisan fluidity: Do we really know a gerrymander when we see one?Political Geography19:249-60.
65.
Schumpeter, Joseph A.1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.
66.
Squire, Peverill.1995. The partisan consequences of congressional redistricting . American Politics Quarterly23:229-40.
67.
Swain, John W., Stephen A. Borrelli, and Brian C. Reed. 1998. Partisan consequences of the post-1990 redistricting for the U.S. House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly51:945-67.
68.
Thompson, Dennis F.2004. Election time: Normative implications of temporal properties of the electoral process in the United States. American Political Science Review98:51-64.
69.
Yoshinaka, Antoine, and Chad Murphy.2009. Partisan gerrymandering and population instability: Completing the redistricting puzzle. Political Geography28:451-62.
