Clayton, Cornell. W., and Howard. Gillman, eds. 1999. Supreme Court decision-making: New institutionalist approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr .1998. Just words: Law, language, and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Epp, Charles R.1998. The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and Supreme Courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Gaventa, John.1980. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
5.
Gillman, Howard.2002. How political parties can use the courts to advance their agendas: Federal courts in the United States, 1875-1891. American Political Science Review96:511-24.
6.
Graber, Mark A.1998. Establishing judicial review? Schooner Peggy and the early Marshall court. Political Research Quarterly51:7-25.
7.
Hilbink, Lisa.2009. The constituted nature of constituents' interests: Historical and ideational factors in judicial empowerment. Political Research Quarterly63: 781-797.
8.
Hirschl, Ran.2004. Towards juristocracy. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
9.
Lovell, George, and Michael McCann .2004. A tangled legacy: Federal courts and the politics of democratic inclusion. In The politics of democratic inclusion, ed. Christina Wolbrecht and Rodney Hero, with Peri E. Arnold and Alvin B. Tillery, 257-80. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
10.
Lukes, Steven.2005. Power: A radical view. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
McCann, Michael.2008. Dr. Strangelove: Or how I learned to stop worrying and love methodology. In Studies in law, politics, and society , ed. Austin Sarat, 19-60. Boston : JAI/Elsevier.
12.
McCann, Michael.1994. Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Merry, Sally Engle.2000. Colonizing Hawai’i: The cultural power of law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Shapiro, Martin.1993. Public law and judicial politics. In Political science: The state of the discipline II, ed. Ada W. Finifter, 365-91. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
15.
Woods, Patricia J., and Lisa Hilbink.Comparative sources of judicial empowerment: Ideas and interests. Political Research Quarterly63: 745-752.
