Over the past thirty years, the cumulative effects of direct democracy have served to decrease both levels of taxation and spending in the American states. Yet conservative budgetary policy measures passed during this time period were likely to occur in liberal states. Using data on over thirty separate ballot issues, the author offers a solution to this puzzle, demonstrating that distrusting government serves as a consistently robust predictor of conservative policy choice. The implication of this finding is that citizens often choose conservative policy outcomes because they believe that government is functionally incapable of giving them what they want.
Baldassare, Mark.2005. The role of public opinion on the California governor’s recall in 2003: Populism, partisanship, and direct democracy. American Politics Research33:163-86.
2.
Baldassare, Mark, and Cheryl Katz.2007. The coming age of direct democracy: California’s recall and beyond. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
3.
Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case.2003. Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature41:7-73.
4.
Boehmke, Frederick J., and John W. Patty .2007. The selection of policies for ballot Initiatives: What voters can learn from legislative inaction. Economics and Politics19:97-121.
5.
Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan.1998. Demanding choices: Opinion, voting and direct democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
Branton, Regina P.2003. Examining individual level voting behavior on state ballot propositions. Political Research Quarterly56:367-77.
7.
Broder, David S.2000. Democracy derailed: Initiative campaigns and the power of money. New York: Harcourt Brace .
8.
Camobreco, John F.1998. Preferences, fiscal policies, and the initiative process . Journal of Politics60 (3): 819-29.
9.
Campbell, Angus, Phillip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes.1960. The American voter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Carsey, Thomas M. and Geoffrey C. Layman.2002. Party polarization and conflict extension in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science46:786-802.
11.
Citrin, Jack.1974. Comment: The political relevance of trust in government . American Political Science Review68: 973-88.
12.
Converse, Philip E.1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and discontent, ed. David Apter, 206-61. New York: Free Press .
13.
Dahl, Robert A.1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter.1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Ellis, Richard J.2002. Democratic delusions: The initiative process in America . Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
16.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver .1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope.2005. Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman .
18.
Gamson, William A.1968. Power and discontent. Homewood, IL : Dorsey.
19.
Gerber, Elisabeth R.1996. Legislative response to the threat of popular initiatives . American Journal of Political Science, 40:99-128.
20.
Gerber, Elisabeth R.1999. The populist paradox. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
21.
Hetherington, Marc J.2005. Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse.2002. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Kahn, Matthew E., and John G. Matsusaka .1997. Demand for environmental goods: Evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. Journal of Law and Economics40:137-73.
24.
Key, V.O., and Winston W. Crouch .1939. The initiative and referendum in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Lascher, Edward L., Jr., Michael G. Hagen, and Steven A. Rochlin.1996. Gun behind the door? Ballot initiatives, state policies and public opinion . Journal of Politics58 (3): 760-75.
26.
Lindsey, Alan.2003. "Polling: The People’s Support for I&R." In M. Dane Waters, ed. Initiative and Referendum Almanac. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press. pp. 477-480.
27.
Lipsky, Michael.1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
28.
Lupia, Arthur.1992. Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information . American Political Science Review86:390-403.
29.
Lupia, Arthur.1994. Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections.American Political Science Review88:63-76.
30.
Lupia, Arthur, and John G. Matsusaka .2004. Direct democracy: New approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science7:463-82.
31.
Lupia, Arthur, and Matthew D. McCubbins .1998. The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Magleby, David B.1984. Direct legislation: Voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
Matsusaka, John G.1994. Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review88: 63-76.
34.
Matsusaka, John G.1995. Fiscal effects of the voter initiative: Evidence from the last 30 years. Journal of Political Economy103:587-623.
35.
Matsusaka, John G.2004. For the many or the few: How the initiative process changes American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Neiman, Max, and Gerry Riposa.1986. Tab rebels and tax rebellion. The Western Political Quarterly39:435-45.
37.
Orren, Gary.1997. Fall from grace: The public’s loss of faith in government . In Why people don’t trust government, ed. Joseph S. Nye Jr., Philip D. Zelikow, and David C. King, 79-83. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen .1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
39.
Schrag, Peter.1998. Paradise lost: California’s experience, America’s future. New York: New Press.
40.
Sears, David O., and Jack Citrin.1982. Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Smith, Daniel A.1998. Tax crusaders and the politics of direct democracy. New York: Routledge.
42.
Smith, Daniel A., and Caroline J. Tolbert .2001. The initiative to party: Partisanship and ballot initiatives in California. Party Politics7:739-57.
