The author presents a unique theory of insurgent group behavior using a fuzzy-set approach. In contrast to arguments that place the culpability of insurgent group violence toward noncombatants in the arena of natural resource endowments or the distinctive nature of contemporary conflicts, the author uses a component of qualitative comparative analysis to show that the presence of “active rivalry” is critical in determining the type of behavior insurgent groups will display with regard to local populations they claim to represent. The use of fuzzy-set analysis is uncommon in conflict studies yet proves to be a valuable alternative to standard statistical tests.
Adamson, Fiona B.2005. Globalization, transnational political mobilization, and networks of violence. Cambridge Review of International Affairs18 (1): 31-49.
2.
Azam, Jean-Paul.2002. Looting and conflict between ethnoregional groups: Lessons for state formation in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 131-53.
3.
Azam, Jean-Paul, and Anke Hoeffler.2002. Violence against civilians in civil wars: Looting or terror? Journal of Peace Research39 (4): 461-85.
4.
Bayart, Jean-Francois, Stephen Ellis, and Beatrice Hibou.1999. The criminalization of the state in Africa. Oxford, UK: James Currey .
5.
Cairns, Edmund.1997. A safer future: Reducing the human cost of war. Oxford, UK: Oxfam Publications.
6.
Carmen.2006. Civilian, interview with author. Zambrano, Department of Bolivar, Colombia, October 27.
7.
The case of the "Apo" interview. 1988. Briefing.
8.
Clapham, Christopher, ed. 1998. African guerrillas. Oxford, UK: J. Curry.
9.
Collier, Paul.2000. Rebellion as a quasi-criminal activity. Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (6): 839-53.
10.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler.2001. Greed and grievance in civil war ( World Bank Research Paper). Washington, DC: World Bank.
11.
Duffield, Mark.1998. Post-modern conflict: Warlords, post-adjustment states and private protection. Civil Wars1 (1): 65-102.
12.
---. 2001. Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. London: Zed.
13.
Ergil, Dogu.2007. Strange but true. Zaman. August 7.
14.
Fearon, James D., and David Laitin.2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war . American Political Science Review97 (1): 75-90.
15.
Geffray, Christian.1990. La cause des armes au Mozambique: Anthropologie d’une guerre civile. CREDU.
16.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and Bethany Lacina.2005. Monitoring trends in global combat: A new dataset of battle deaths. European Journal of Population21 (2-3): 145-66.
17.
Grossman, Herschel I.1999. Kleptocracy and revolution. Oxford Economic Papers51 (2): 267-83.
18.
Kaldor, Mary.1999. New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Kalyvas, Stathis N.1999. Wanton and senseless? The logic of massacres in Algeria . Rationality and Society11 (3): 243-85.
20.
---. 2006. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Kasfir, Nelson.2005. Guerrillas and civilian participation: The National Resistance Army in Uganda, 1981-1986. Journal of Modern African Studies43 (2): 271-96.
22.
Kay, Bruce H.1999. Violent opportunities: The rise and fall of "king coca" and Shining Path. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs41 (3): 97-127.
23.
Keen, David.1998. The economic functions of violence in civil wars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Kevane, M., and E. Stiansen.1998. Introduction. In Kordofan invaded: Peripheral incorporation and social transformation in Islamic Africa , ed. M. Kevane and E. Stiansen.Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
25.
Kok, Peter N.1996. Governance and conflict in the Sudan, 1985-1995: Analysis, evaluation and documentation. Hamburg, Germany: Deutsches Orient Institut.
26.
Manwaring, Max G.2002. Nonstate actors in Colombia: Threat and response. Carlisle Barracks, PAStrategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
27.
Metelits, Claire.2004. Reformed rebels? Democratization, global norms, and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army. Africa Today51 (1): 65-84.
28.
---. Forthcoming. The insurgent rationale. New York: New York University Press.
29.
Mill, John Stuart. [1843]. 1967. A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive . Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
30.
Mkandawire, Thandika.2002. The terrible toll of post-colonial "insurgent movements" in Africa: Towards an explanation of the violence against the peasantry. Journal of Modern African Studies40 (2): 181-215.
31.
Olson, Mancur.1993. Dictatorship, democracy and development. American Political Science Review87 (3): 567-76.
32.
Ortiz, Roman D.2002. Insurgent strategies in the post-cold war: The case of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism25:127-43.
33.
Philips, David L.2007. Disarming, demobilizing and reintegrating the Kurdistan Workers’ Party. New York: National Committee on American Foreign Policy.
34.
Poole, Deborah, and Gerardo Renique .1992. Peru: Time of fear. London: Research and Action Latin America Bureau.
35.
Ragin, Charles.1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
---. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Reno, William.1998. Warlord politics and African states. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
38.
Richani, Nazih.2002. Systems of violence: The political economy of war and peace in Colombia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
Rolandsen, Oystein H.2005. Guerrilla government: Political changes in the southern Sudan during the 1990s. Uppsala, Sweden: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
40.
Skaaning, Svend-Erik.2005. The respect for civil liberties in post-communist countries: A multi-methodological test of structural explanations. http://www.compasss.org/skaaning 2005b.pdf.
41.
Weinstein, Jeremy.2006. Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
