Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey Banks.1988. Elections, coalitions, and legislative outcomes. American Political Science Review82:405-22.
2.
Bäck, Hanna, and Patrick Dumont.2007. Combining large-n and small-n strategies: The way forward in coalition research. West European Politics30:467-501.
3.
Baron, David P.1998. Comparative dynamics of parliamentary governments . American Political Science Review92 (3): 593-609.
4.
Baron, David P., and Daniel Diermeier .2001. Elections, governments, and parliaments in proportional representation systems. Quarterly Journal of Economics116:933-67.
5.
Baron, David, and John Ferejohn.1989. Bargaining in legislatures. American Political Science Review83:1181-1206.
6.
Browne, Eric C., and John Dreijmanis, eds. 1982. Government coalitions in Western democracies. New York: Longman.
7.
Browne, Eric, and Mark Franklin.1973. Aspects of coalition pay-offs in European parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review67:453-69.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce.1975. Strategy, risk, and personality in coalition politics: The case of India. London: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Carroll, Royce, and Gary W. Cox .2007. The logic of Gamson's law: Pre-election coalitions and portfolio allocations. American Journal of Political Science51 (2): 300-13.
10.
Diermeier, Daniel.2006. Coalition government. In The Oxford handbook of political economy, ed. Barry R. Weingast and Donald Wittman.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Diermeier, Daniel, Hülya Eraslan, and Antonio Merlo.2008. Bicameralism and government formation. Unpublished paper, Northwestern University.
12.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Antonio Merlo.2000. Government turnover in parliamentary democracies. Journal of Economic Theory94:46-79.
13.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Randolph T. Stevenson .1999. Cabinet survival and competing risks. American Journal of Political Science43 (4): 1051-68.
14.
---. 2000. Cabinet terminations and critical events. American Political Science Review94 (3): 627-40.
15.
Druckman, James N.1996. Party factionalism and cabinet durability. Party Politics2:397-407.
16.
Druckman, James N., and Michael F. Thies .2002. The importance of concurrence: The impact of bicameralism on government formation and duration. American Journal of Political Science46:760-71.
17.
Golder, Sona.2006. The logic of pre-electoral coalition formation . Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
18.
Laver, Michael.1986. Between theoretical elegance and political reality: Deductive models and cabinet coalitions in Europe. In Coalitional behavior in theory and practice: An inductive model for Western Europe, ed. Geoffrey Pridham.Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
---. 1998. Models of government formation. Annual Review of Political Science1:1-25.
20.
Laver, Michael, and W. Ben Hunt .1992. Policy and party competition . New York: Routledge.
21.
Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle .1990. Government coalitions and intraparty politics. British Journal of Political Science20:489-507.
22.
---. 1998. Events, equilibria and government survival. American Journal of Political Science42:28-54.
23.
Leiserson, Michael.1970. Game theory and the study of coalition behavior . In The study of coalition behavior, ed. Sven Groennings, E. W. Kelley, and Michael Leiserson.New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
24.
Lijphart, Arend.1999. Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Lupia, Arthur, and Kaare Strøm.1995. Coalition termination and the strategic timing of parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review89:648-65.
26.
Martin, Lanny W.2004. The government agenda in parliamentary democracies . American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 445-61.
27.
Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson .1995. A unified approach to cabinet formation and survival in parliamentary democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association , Chicago, IL.
28.
---. 2001. Government formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science45:33-50.
29.
Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg.2004. Policing the bargain: Coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science48 (1): 13-27.
30.
Morelli, Massimo.1999. Demand competition and policy compromise in legislative bargaining. American Political Science Review93 (4): 809-20.
31.
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strøm, eds. 2000. Coalition governments in Western Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
Riker, William H.1962. The theory of political coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
Skjæveland, Asbjørn, Søren Serritzlew, and Jans Blom-Hansen.2007. Theories of coalition formation: An empirical test using data from Danish local government. European Journal of Political Research46 (5): 721-45.
34.
Smith, Alastair.2004. Election timing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Strøm, Kaare.1990a. A behavioral theory of competitive parties. American Journal of Political Science34:565-98.
36.
---. 1990b. Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
---. 1994. The Presthus debacle: Intraparty politics and bargaining failure in Norway. American Political Science Review88:112-27.
38.
Strøm, Kaare, Ian Budge, and Michael J. Laver .1994. Constraints on cabinet formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science38:303-35.
39.
Strøm, Kaare, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman, eds. 2003. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
Strøm, Kaare, and Stephen M. Swindle .2002. Strategic parliamentary dissolution . American Political Science Review96:575-91.
41.
Warwick, Paul V.1994. Government survival in parliamentary democracies . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Warwick, Paul V., and James N. Druckman .2006. The paradox of portfolio allocation: An investigation into the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship. European Journal of Political Research45:635-65.
