This study tests two theories of legislative leadership by comparing the power of majority-party leaders in states where the Republican Party adopted a state-level version of “The Contract with America” in 1994, with that of leaders in states where no contract was adopted. Using a nationwide survey of legislators to rank power, the study finds that the lower house leaders in contract states were stronger in 1995, as were those from states in which the public was ideologically polarized along partisan lines. The results provide support for conditional party government theory while expanding our knowledge of state legislative politics.
Aldrich, John H., and James S. Battista .2002. Conditional party government in the states. American Journal of Political Science46:164-72.
2.
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde .1997. The transition to Republican rule in the house: Implications for theories of congressional politics. Political Science Quarterly112:541-67.
3.
Bianco, William T., and Itai Sened.2005. Uncovering evidence of conditional party government: Reassessing majority party influence in congress and state legislatures . American Political Science Review99:361-71.
4.
Broder, David S.1995. State officials also feeling urge to trim: Government being constricted in face of conservative tide. The Washington Post, July 30, 1995.
5.
Carey, John M., Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell .1998. The effects of term limits on state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly23:271-300.
6.
---. 2000a. State legislative survey and contextual data, 1995. [Computer file]. Columbus, OH: Kathleen Carr, Ohio State University, Polimetrics Lab [producer]; Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
7.
---. 2000b. Term limits in the state legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Clucas, Richard A.2001. Principal-agent theory and the power of state house speakers . Legislative Studies Quarterly26:319-38.
9.
---. 2007. Legislative professionalism and the power of state house leaders. State Politics and Policy Quarterly7:1-19.
10.
Council of State Governments.1994- 1995. The book of the states. Lexington, KY: Author.
11.
---. 1996-1997. The book of the states. Lexington, KY: Author.
12.
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins .1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
---. 2005. Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Elazar, Daniel J.1984. American federalism: A view from the states. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
15.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver .1994. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Francis, Wayne L.1989. The legislative committee game: A comparative analysis of fifty states. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
17.
Hamm, Keith E., and Robert Harmel.1993. Legislative party development and the speaker system: The case of the Texas House. Journal of Politics55:1140-51.
18.
Harmel, Robert, and Keith E. Hamm .1986. Development of a party role in a no-party legislature. Western Political Quarterly39:79-92.
19.
Herron, Michael C.1999. Artificial extremism in interest groups ratings and the preferences versus party debate. Legislative Studies Quarterly24:525-42.
20.
Highton, Benjamin, and Michael S. Rocca .2005. Beyond the roll-call arena: The determinants of position taking in Congress. Political Research Quarterly58:303-16.
21.
Jacobson, Gary C.1996. The 1994 House election in perspective. Political Science Quarterly111:203-23.
22.
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Marcia Lynn Whicker .1994. Legislative leadership in the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
King, James D.2000. Changes in professionalism in U.S. state legislatures . Legislative Studies Quarterly25:327-43.
24.
Krehbiel, Keith.1991. Information and legislative organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
---. 1998. Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. policymaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
---. 2000. Party discipline and measures of partisanship. American Journal of Political Science44:212-27.
27.
Lebo, Matthew J., Adam J. McGlynn, and Gregory Koger.2007. Strategic party government: Party influence in Congress, 1789-2000. American Journal of Political Science51:464-81.
28.
Little, Thomas H.1997. An experiment in responsible party government: National agenda setting and state replicas of the Contract with America. The American Review of Politics18:1-23.
29.
---. 1998. On the coattails of a contract: RNC activities and Republican gains in the 1994 state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly51:171-90.
30.
Maddox, H. W. Jerome.2005. The institutional implications of outside careers: Delegation, legislator goals, and leadership power. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Oakland, CA.
31.
Moncrief, Gary F., Joel A. Thompson, and Karl T. Kurtz .1996. The old Statehouse, it ain't what it used to be. Legislative Studies Quarterly21:57-72.
32.
Rohde, David.1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
---. 1994. Parties and committees in the House: Member motivation, issues, and institutional arrangements. Legislative Studies Quarterly19:341-59.
34.
Rosenthal, Alan.1993. The legislative institution: In transition and at risk . 2nd ed. In The state of the states , ed. Carl Van Horn, 115-48. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
35.
Rosenthal, Alan.1998. The decline of representative democracy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
36.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast .1994. Positive theories of congressional institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly19:149-79.
37.
Smith, Steven S.2000. Positive theories of congressional parties. Legislative Studies Quarterly25:193-215.
38.
Squire, Peverill.1988. Career opportunities and membership stability in legislatures . Legislative Studies Quarterly13:65-82.
39.
Storey, Tim.2006. No party for the GOP?State Legislatures , September.
40.
Thompson, Joel A., and Gary F. Moncrief .1992. The evolution of the state legislature: Institutional change and legislative careers. In Changing patterns in state legislative careers, ed. Gary F. Moncrief and Joel A. Thompson, 195-206. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
41.
Trumbull, Mark.1994. Statehouse take on Republican tint too, shaping local issues. Christian Science Monitor, November 14.
42.
Wright, Gerald C., and Brian F. Schaffner .2002. The influence of party: Evidence from the state legislatures. American Political Science Review96:367-79.
