This study tests hypotheses linking the structural characteristics of policy networks to the feelings of trust of their members. A social capital perspective suggests that actors in denser networks should trust others more, while an alternative “centrality” approach suggests that trust may be a byproduct of the occupation of key positions in the group. The author tests these expectations with data mapping policy networks in twenty-two estuaries in the United States and finds that centrality is a better predictor of trust. This opens room for questioning the real value of trust as a necessary ingredient in the solution of collective action dilemmas.
Bardach, Eugene.1998. Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
Bavelas, Alex.1950. Communication patterns in task oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America22:271-82.
3.
Bavelas, Alex, and Dermot Barrett.1951. An experimental approach to organizational communication. Personnel27:366-71.
4.
Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman .2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
5.
Brass, Daniel J., and Marlene E. Burkhardt .1992. Centrality and power in organizations . In Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action , ed. Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles, 191-215. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
6.
Brass, Daniel J., and Marlene E. Burkhardt .1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal36:441-70.
7.
Bromiley, Philip, and Larry L. Cummings .1995. Transaction costs in organizations with trust. In Research on negotiation in organizations, ed. Robert Bies, Blair H. Sheppard, and Roy J. Lewicki, 219-47. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8.
Burt, Ronald S.2001. Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. In Networks and markets: Contributions from economics and sociology, ed. Alessandra Casella and James E. Rauch, 30-74. New York: Russell Sage.
9.
Coleman, James S.1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94:95-120.
10.
Coleman, James S.1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Cook, Karen, Russell Hardin, and Margaret Levi.2005. Cooperation without trust?New York: Russell Sage.
12.
Costenbader, Elizabeth, and Thomas W. Valente .2003. The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Social Networks25:283-307.
13.
Emerson, Richard M.1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review27:31-40.
14.
Focht, Will, and Zev Trachtenberg .2005. A trust-based guide to stakeholder participation. In Swimming upstream. Collaborative approaches to watershed management, ed. Paul A. Sabatier , Will Focht, Mark Lubell, Zev Trachtenberg, Arnold Vedlitz, and Marty Matlock, 85-136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Freeman, Linton C.1979. Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification . Social Networks1:215-39.
16.
Gnyawali, Devi R., and Ravindranath Madhavan .2001. Network structure and competitive dynamics: A structural embedded-ness perspective. Academy of Management Review26:431-45.
17.
Kickert, Walter J. M., Eric-Hans Klijn, and Joop F. M. Koppenjan.1997. Introduction: A management perspective on policy networks. In Managing complex networks. Strategies for the public sector, ed. Walter J.M. Kickert, Eric-Hans Klijn, and Joop F.M. Koppenjan, 1-13. London : Sage.
18.
Kollock, Peter.1994. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology100:313-45.
19.
Leach, William D., and Paul A. Sabatier .2005. To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. American Political Science Review99:491-503.
20.
Lubell, Mark.2005. Do watershed partnerships enhance beliefs conducive to collective action? In Swimming upstream. Collaborative approaches to watershed management, ed. Paul A. Sabatier , Will Focht, Mark Lubell, Zev Trachtenberg, Arnold Vedlitz, and Marty Matlock, 201-32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Lubell, Mark.2007. Familiarity breeds trust: Collective action in a policy domain. Journal of Politics69:237-50.
22.
McEvily, Bill, Roberto A. Weber, Cristina Bicchieri, and Violet Ho.2002. Can groups be trusted? An experimental study of collective trust. Working Paper 308, Carnegie Mellon Behavioral Decision Research, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA .
23.
Ostrom, Elinor.1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Putnam, Robert D.1993. Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
25.
Putnam, Robert D.1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy6:65-78.
26.
Sabatier, Paul A., William D. Leach, Mark Lubell, and Neil W. Pelkey .2005. Theoretical frameworks explaining partnership success. In Swimming upstream. Collaborative approaches to watershed management, ed. Paul A. Sabatier , Will Focht, Mark Lubell, Zev Trachtenberg, Arnold Vedlitz, and Marty Matlock, 173-200. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Schneider, Mark, John Scholz, Mark Lubell, Denisa Mindruta, and Matthew Edwardsen .2003. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science47:143-58.
28.
Scholz, John T., Ramiro Berardo, and Brad Kile. Forthcoming. Do networks enhance cooperation? Credibility, search, and collaboration in joint environmental projects. Journal of Politics70.
29.
Scholz, John T., and Mark Lubell.1998. Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science42:398-417.
30.
Siegrist, Michael, Timothy C. Earle, and H. Gutscher.2007. Trust in cooperative risk management: Uncertainty and skepticism in the public mind. London: Earthscan.
31.
Stork, Diana, and William D. Richards1992. Nonrespondents in communication network studies: Problems and possibilities. Group and Organization Management17:193-209.
32.
Taylor, Michael, and Sara Singleton.1993. The communal resource: Transaction costs and the solution of collective action problems. Politics and Society21:195-214.
33.
Williamson, Oliver E.1993. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics34:453-502.
