Adcock, Robert, and David Collier.2001. Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review95 (September): 529-46.
2.
Epstein, Lee, and Gary King.2002. The rules of inference. University of Chicago Law Review69 (Winter): 1-133.
3.
Epstein, Lee, Andrew Martin, Jeffrey Segal, and Chad Westerland .2007. The judicial common space. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization23 (2): 303-25.
4.
Farhang, Sean, and Gregory Wawro.2002. Institutional dynamics on the U.S. Courts of Appeals: Minority representation under panel decision making. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization20 (2): 299-330.
5.
Giles, Micheal W., Virginia Hettinger, and Todd Peppers.1998. Alternative measures of preferences for judges of the Courts of Appeals. Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
6.
________. 2002. Measuring the preferences of federal judges: Alternatives to party of the appointing president. Working paper.
7.
Giles, Micheal W., Thomas Walker, and Christopher Zorn .2006. Setting a judicial agenda: The decision to grant en banc in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Journal of Politics68 (November): 852-66.
8.
Goldman, Sheldon.1997. Picking federal judges: Lower Court selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Hettinger, Virginia, Stefanie Lindquist, and WendyMartinek . 2004. Comparing the attitudinal and the strategic accounts of dissenting behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. American Journal of Political Science48 (January): 123-37.
10.
Howard, Robert.2007. Controlling forum choice and controlling policy: Congress, courts and the IRS. Policy Studies Journal35 (1): 109-23.
11.
Johnson, Susan, and Donald Songer.2002. The influence of presidential versus home state senatorial preferences on the policy output of judges on the United States District Courts. Law and Society Review36 (3): 657-76.
12.
Lindquist, Stefanie, and Frank Cross.2005. Empirically testing Dworkin's chain novel theory: Studying the path of precedent. New York University Law Review80 (4): 1156-1206.
13.
Luse, Jennifer.2006The effect of the Lemon Regime on Courts of Appeals decision making. Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
14.
Peresie, Jennifer.2005. Female judges matter: Gender and collegial decision making in the federal appellate courts. Yale Law Journal114 (May): 1761-90.
15.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal .1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Randazzo, Kirk, Richard Waterman, and Jeffrey Fine.2006. Checking the federal courts: The impact of congressional statutes on judicial behavior. Journal of Politics68 (November): 1006-17.
17.
Rowland, C.K., and Robert A. Carp.1996. Politics and judgment in federal district courts. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
18.
Rowland, C.K., Robert Carp, and Ronald Stidham.1984. Judges' policy choices and the value basis of judicial appointments: A comparison of support for criminal defendants among Nixon, Johnson, and Kennedy appointees to the federal district courts . Journal of Politics46 (August): 886-902.
19.
Ruger, Theodore.2007. Chief Justice Rehnquist's appointments to the FISACourt: An empirical perspective. Northwestern University Law Review101 (1): 239-58.
20.
Scott, Kevin.2006. Understanding judicial hierarchy: Reversals and the behavior of intermediate appellate judges. Law and Society Review40(1): 163-92.
21.
Songer, Donald.1982. The policy consequence of Senate involvement in the appointment of Courts of Appeal judges. Western Political Quarterly35 (March): 107-19.
