Bendor, Jonathan, Daniel Diermier, and Michael Ting.2003. A behavioral model of turnout. American Political Science Review97:261-80.
2.
Bennett, Stephen.2007. Another look at the implications of non-voting for democracy . Presented at the 2007 American Political Science Association meeting, Chicago, August 30-September 2.
3.
Campbell, Andrea Louise.2002. Self-interest, social security and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. American Political Science Review96:565-74.
4.
———. 2003. Participatory reactions to policy threats: Senior citizens and the defense of Social Security and Medicare. Political Behavior25:29-49.
5.
Finkel, Steven E., and Edward Muller.1998. Rational choice and the dynamics of collective political action: Evaluating alternative models with panel data. American Political Science Review92 (1): 37-49.
6.
Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green .2000a. The effect of a non-partisan get-out-the-vote drive: An experimental study of leafletting. Journal of Politics62 (3): 846-57.
7.
———. 2000b. The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review94 (3): 653-63.
8.
———. 2002. Do phone calls increase voter turnout? A field experiment . Public Opinion Quarterly65 (1): 75-85.
9.
Goeree, Jacob K., and Charles A. Holt .2005. An explanation of anomalous behavior in models of political participation. American Political Science Review99:201-13.
10.
Goldstein, Kenneth M., and Travis N. Ridout .2002. The politics of participation: Mobilization and turnout over time. Political Behavior24:3-29.
11.
Green, Donald.2004. Mobilizing African-American voters using direct mail and commercial phone banks: A field experiment. Political Research Quarterly57:245-55.
12.
Green, Donald, and Alan Gerber.1999. Does canvassing increase voter turnout?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 19:10939-42.
13.
Green, Donald, Alan Gerber, and D. Nickerson.2003. Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics65:1083-6.
14.
Grober, Jens, and Arthur Schram.2006. Neighborhood information exchange and voter participation: An experimental study. American Political Science Review100:235-48.
15.
Grofman, Bernard.1993. Is turnout the paradox that ate rational choice theory? In Information, participation and choice, ed. B. Grofman, 1—13. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
Harris, Fredrick, Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, and Brian D. McKenzie .2006. Countervailing forces in African-American civic activism, 1973-1994. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Jacobs, Lawrence, and Theda Skocpol, eds. 2005. Inequality and American democracy: What we know and what we need to learn. New York: Russell Sage.
18.
Lake, RonaldLa Due, and Robert Huckfeldt.1998. Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology19:567-84.
19.
Leighley, Jan E., and Jonathan Nagler .2007a. Unions, voter turnout and class bias in the electorate, 1964-2004. Journal of Politics69:430-41.
20.
———. 2007b. Who votes now? And does it matter?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association , Chicago, April 13-15.
21.
Levine, David K., and Thomas Palfrey.2007. The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study . American Political Science Review101:143-58.
22.
Lijphart, Arend.1997. Unequal participation: Democracy's unresolved dilemma . American Political Science Review91:1-14.
23.
Martin, Paul S.2003. Voting's rewards: Voter turnout, attentive publics and congressional allocation of federal money. American Journal of Political Science47:110-27.
24.
McClurg, Scott.2003. Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly56:448-64.
25.
———. 2006a. Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, discussion, and disagreement on electoral participation . Political Behavior28:349-66.
26.
———. 2006b. The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining the effect of disagreement and expertise in social networks on political participation . American Journal of Political Science50:737-54.
27.
Mettler, Suzanne.2002. Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the GI Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review96: 351-65.
28.
Muhlberger, Peter.2000. Moral reasoning effects on political participation. Political Psychology21 (4): 667-95.
29.
Mutz, Diana C.2002a. The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science46:838-55.
30.
———. 2002b. Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in action. American Political Science Review96:111-26.
31.
———. 2006. Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Opp, Karl Dieter.1998. Does antiregime action under communist rule affect political protest after the fall? Results of a panel study in East Germany. Sociological Quarterly39 (2): 189-213.
33.
———. 2000. Adverse living conditions, grievances, and political protest after communism: The example of East Germany. Social Forces79 (1): 29-65.
34.
Plutzer, Eric.2002. Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review96:41-56.
35.
Putnam, Robert D.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon and Schuster.
36.
Rosenstone, Steven, and John Mark Hansen .1993. Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
37.
Scheussler, Alex.2000. Expressive voting. Rationality and Society12:87-119.
38.
Soss, Joe.1999. Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning and political action. American Political Science Review93:363-80.
39.
Verba, Sidney.2003. Would the dream of political equality turn out to be a nightmare? Perspectives on Politics1:663-79.
40.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady .1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.