Electoral competition has been an important subject of political science research over the past several decades. This article examines the effects of campaign spending on electoral competition in state supreme court elections. Specifically, the author addresses the question, How do campaign expenditures affect the performance of incumbents in supreme court elections? The author finds that, just like elections to Congress and state legislatures, electoral competition in state supreme court elections can be understood by looking at characteristics of the candidates, the state and electoral context, and institutional arrangements.
Alvarez, R. Michael.1997. Information and elections. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
2.
American Bar Association.1998. Report and recommendations of the Task Force on Lawyers' Political Contributions: Part II. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
3.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Alan Gerber.1994 . The mismeasure of campaign spending: Evidence from the 1990 United States House elections. Journal of Politics56 (November): 1106-18.
4.
Arrington, Theodore S.1996. When money doesn't matter: Campaign spending for minor statewide judicial and executive offices in North Carolina. Justice System Journal18 (3): 257-66.
5.
Aspin, Larry T., and William K. Hall .1987. The friends and neighbors effect in judicial retention elections. Western Political Quarterly40 (December): 703-15.
6.
Aspin, Larry T., William K. Hall, Jean Bax, and Celeste Montoya .2000. Thirty years of judicial retention elections: An update. The Social Science Journal37 (January): 1-17.
7.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Randall W. Partin .1995. Economic and referendum voting: A comparison of gubernatorial and Senate elections. American Political Science Review89 (March): 99-107.
8.
Banks, Jeffrey S., and D. Roderick Kiewiet .1989. Explaining patterns of candidate competition in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science33 (November): 997-1015.
9.
Bardwell, Kedron.2002. Money and challenger emergence in gubernatorial primaries . Political Research Quarterly55 (September): 653-67.
10.
Bell, Dawson.2001. Engler to ask for appointed high court. Detroit Free Press, January 27.
11.
Biersack, Robert, Paul S. Herrnson, and Clyde Wilcox.1993. Seeds for success: Early money in congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly18 (November): 535-51.
12.
Bonneau, Chris W.2004. Patterns of campaign spending and electoral competition in state supreme court elections. Justice System Journal25 (1): 21-38.
13.
———. 2005. Electoral verdicts: Incumbent defeats in state supreme court elections. American Politics Research33 (November): 818-41.
14.
Bonneau, Chris W., and Melinda Gann Hall .2003. Predicting challengers in state supreme court elections: Context and the politics of institutional design . Political Research Quarterly56 (September): 337-49.
15.
Brace, Paul, and Melinda Gann Hall .1990. Neo-institutionalism and dissent in state supreme courts. Journal of Politics52 (February): 54-70.
16.
———. 1995. Studying courts comparatively: The view from the American states. Political Research Quarterly48 (March): 5-29.
17.
———. 1997. The interplay of preferences, case facts, context, and structure in the politics of judicial choice. Journal of Politics59 (November): 1206-31.
18.
Burbank, Stephen B., and Barry Friedman.2002. Reconsidering judicial independence . In Judicial independence at the cross-roads: An interdisciplinary approach, ed. Stephen B. Burbank and Barry Friedman.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Carsey, Thomas M., and Gerald R. Wright.1998. State and national forces in gubernatorial and senate elections. American Journal of Political Science42 (July): 994-1002.
20.
Cassie, William E., and David A. Breaux.1998. Expenditures and election results. In Campaign finance in state legislative elections , ed. Joel A. Thompson and Gary F. Moncrief.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
21.
Champagne, Anthony.2003. The politics of judicial selection. Policy Studies Journal31 (August): 413-19.
22.
Champagne, Anthony, and Judith Haydel, eds. 1993. Judicial reform in the states. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
23.
Champagne, Anthony, and Greg Thielemann .1991. Awareness of trial court judges. Judicature74 (February-March): 271-76.
24.
Dickerson, Brian.2001. Belatedly, Engler seeks court reform. Detroit Free Press, January 29.
25.
Dimino, Michael R.2004. The futile quest for a system of judicial “merit” selection. Albany Law Review67 (Spring): 803-19.
26.
———. 2005. The worst way of selecting judges—Except all the others that have been tried. Northern Kentucky Law Review32 (2): 267-304.
27.
Dubois, Philip L.1979. The significance of voting cues in state supreme court elections. Law and Society Review13 (Spring): 757-79.
28.
———. 1984. Voting cues in nonpartisan trial court elections: A multivariate assessment. Law and Society Review18 (3): 395-436.
29.
———. 1986. Penny for your thoughts? Campaign spending in California trial court elections, 1976-1982. Western Political Quarterly39 (June): 265-84.
30.
Erikson, Robert S., and Thomas R. Palfrey .2000. Equilibria in campaign spending games: Theory and data. American Political Science Review94 (September): 595-609.
31.
Geyh, Charles Gardner.2003. Why judicial elections stink. Ohio State University Law Journal64 (1): 43-79.
32.
Gierzynski, Anthony, and David A. Breaux .1991. Money and votes in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (May): 203-17.
33.
Giles, Micheal W., and Anita Pritchard .1985. Campaign expenditures and legislative elections in Florida. Legislative Studies Quarterly10 (February): 71-88.
34.
Glaberson, William.2000a. Fierce campaigns signal a new era for state courts . New York Times, June 5.
35.
———. 2000b. State chief justices plan to meet on judicial candidates' abuses. New York Times, September 8.
36.
Green, Donald Philip, and Jonathan S. Krasno .1988. Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in House elections . American Journal of Political Science32 (November): 884-907.
37.
———. 1990. Rebuttal to Jacobson's “New evidence for old arguments .” American Journal of Political Science32 (November): 884-907.
38.
Hall, Melinda Gann.1992. Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. Journal of Politics54 (May): 427-46.
39.
———. 1995. Justices as representatives: Elections and judicial politics in the American states. American Politics Quarterly23 (October): 485-503.
40.
———. 2001. State supreme courts in American democracy: Probing the myths of judicial reform. American Political Science Review95 (June): 315-30.
41.
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Chris W. Bonneau .2006. Does quality matter? Challengers in state supreme court elections. American Journal of Political Journal50 (January): 20-33.
42.
Hansen, Mark. 1998. A run for the bench. ABA Journal84 (October): 68-72.
43.
Hanssen, F. Andrew.2004. Is there a politically optimal level of judicial independence?American Economic Review94 (June): 712-29.
44.
Jacobson, Gary C.1978. The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections . American Political Science Review72 (June): 469-91.
45.
———. 1980. Money in congressional elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
———. 1985. Money and votes reconsidered: Congressional elections, 1972-1982. Public Choice47 (1): 7-62.
47.
———. 1989. Strategic politicians and the dynamics of U.S. House elections, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review83 (September): 773-93.
48.
———. 1990. The effects of campaign spending in House elections: New evidence for old arguments. American Journal of Political Science34 (May): 334-62.
49.
———. 1997. The politics of congressional elections. 4th ed. New York: Longman .
50.
Jewell, Malcolm.1982. Representation in state legislatures. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
51.
Klein, David, and Lawrence Baum.2001. Ballot information and voting decisions in judicial elections. Political Research Quarterly54 (December): 709-28.
52.
Long, J. Scott.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
53.
Niemi, Richard G., Harold W. Stanley, and Ronald J. Vogel .1995. State economies and state taxes: Do voters hold governors accountable? American Journal of Political Science39 (November): 936-57.
54.
Partin, Randall W.2002. Assessing the impact of campaign spending in governors' races. Political Research Quarterly55 (March): 213-33.
55.
Phillips, Thomas R.2003. It's time to bang the gavel on state's judicial election system. Fort Worth Star-Telegram, March 9.
56.
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 2001. Editorial: Ridge the reformer. February 14.
57.
Schotland, Roy A.1985. Elective judges' campaign financing: Are state judges' robes the emperor's clothes of American democracy?Journal of Law and Politics2 (Spring): 57-167.
58.
Squire, Peverill.1989. Competition and uncontested seats in U.S. House elections . Legislative Studies Quarterly14 (May): 281-95.
59.
———. 1995. Candidates, money, and voters—Assessing the state of congressional elections research. Political Research Quarterly48 (December): 891-917.
60.
Svoboda, Craig J.1995. Retrospective voting in gubernatorial elections: 1982 and 1986. Political Research Quarterly48 (March): 135-50.
61.
Thielemann, Gregory S.1993. Local advantage in campaign financing: Friends, neighbors, and their money in Texas Supreme Court elections. Journal of Politics55 (May): 472-78.
62.
Thomas, Scott J.1989. Do incumbent campaign expenditures matter?Journal of Politics51 (November): 965-76.
63.
Van Dunk, Emily.1997. Challenger quality in state legislative elections . Political Research Quarterly50 (September): 793-807.
64.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.2000. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Press .
65.
Welch, W.P.1981. Money and votes: A simultaneous equation model . Public Choice36: 209-34.
