By and large, unless the president's public appeals for legislation are reported by the national media, only his immediate audiences will hear them. This article examines 541 presidential legislative appeals from the Reagan and first Bush administrations to determine how often such appeals are reported and which ones generate press coverage. It is discovered that the majority of appeals by the president are not reported. This finding helps explain why presidents struggle to build public support for their proposals, as the public cannot be persuaded by messages it never hears. Presidents themselves appear largely responsible for this limited coverage, as most of their appeals are quite short and not the central focus of their public remarks. However, appeals that meet the press's criteria for newsworthiness are reported more often, particularly those that are most significant to the president and that easily fit the narrative style of reporting favored by journalists.
Adatto, Kiku.1990. Sound bite democracy: Network evening news presidential campaign coverage, 1968 and 1988. Joan Shorenstein Barone Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Research Paper R-2, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
2.
Alterman, Eric.2003. What liberal media? The truth about bias and the news . New York: Basic Books.
3.
Barrett, Andrew W.2004. Gone public: The impact of going public on presidential legislative success. American Politics Research32:338-70.
4.
———. 2005. Going public as a legislative weapon: Measuring presidential appeals regarding specific legislation. Presidential Studies Quarterly35:1-10.
5.
Bennett, W. Lance.2005. News: The politics of illusion. 6th ed. New York: Pearson Education .
6.
Boorstin, Daniel.1961. The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Atheneum.
7.
Cater, Douglass.1959. The fourth branch of government. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Cohen, Jeffrey E.2004. Presidential public activities, changing news structures, and the volume of presidential news, 1857-1998. Paper presented at the 2004 American Political Science Association meeting , Chicago.
9.
Cook, Timothy E.1989. Making laws and making news: Media strategies in theU.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10.
———. 1996. The negotiation of newsworthiness. In The psychology of political communication, ed. Ann N. Crigler.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
Cook, Timothy E., and Lyn Ragsdale.1998. The president and the press: Negotiating newsworthiness at the White House. In The presidency & the political system, 5th ed., ed. MichaelNelson. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
12.
Coulter, Ann H.2002. Slander: Liberal lies about the American right. New York: Crown.
13.
Covington, Cary R., Kent Kroeger, Glenn Richardson, and J. David Woodard .1993. Shaping a candidate's image in the press: Ronald Reagan and the 1980 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly46:783-98.
14.
Davis, Richard.2001. The press and American politics: The new mediator. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Domke, David, Mark D. Watts, Dhavan Shah, and David P. Fan.1999. The politics of conservative elites and the “liberal media” argument. Journal of Communication49:35-58.
16.
Edwards, George C., III.2003. On deaf ears: The limits of the bully pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Edwards, George C., III, and Andrew Barrett.2000. Presidential agenda setting in Congress. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, ed. Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
18.
Edwards, George C., Iii, Andrew Barrett, and Jeffrey Peake.1997. The legislative impact of divided government . American Journal of Political Science41:545-63.
19.
Edwards, George C., III, and B. Dan Wood.1999. Who influences whom? The president, Congress, and the media. American Political Science Review93:327-44.
20.
Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew, and Jeffrey S. Peake .2005. Presidents and the economic agenda. Political Research Quarterly58:127-38.
21.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter .2003. The nightly news nightmare: Network television's coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2000. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
Flowers, Julianne F., Audrey A. Haynes, and Michael H. Crespin .2003. The media, the campaign, and the message. American Journal of Political Science47:259-73.
23.
Fuller, Jack.1996. News values: Ideas for an information age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Goldberg, Bernard.2001. Bias: A CBS insider exposes how the media distort the news. Washington, DC: Regnery.
25.
Graber, Doris A.2002. Mass media & American politics. 6th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
26.
Grossman, Michael Baruch, and Martha Joynt Kumar .1981. Portraying the president: The White House and the news media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Hart, Roderick P.1987. The sound of leadership: Presidential communication in the modern age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Hertsgaard, Mark. 1988. On bended knee: The press and the Reagan presidency. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
29.
Kernell, Samuel.1997. Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership . 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
30.
Kumar, Martha Joynt.2000. The president as message and messenger: Personal style and presidential communications. In Presidential power: Forging the presidency for the twenty-first century, ed. Robert Y. Shapiro, Martha Joynt Kumar, and Lawrence R. Jacobs.New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
———. 2003. The White House and the press: News organizations as a presidential resource and as a source of pressure . Presidential Studies Quarterly33:669-83.
32.
Kurtz, Howard.1998. Spin cycle: How the White House and the media manipulate the news. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33.
Long, J. Scott.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
34.
Mayhew, David R.1991. Divided we govern: Party control, law-making, and investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Niven, David.1999. Partisan bias in the media? A new test. Social Science Quarterly80:847-57.
36.
Paletz, David L.2002. The media in American politics: Contents and consequences . 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
37.
Peake, Jeffrey S.2001. Presidential agenda setting in foreign policy. Political Research Quarterly54:69-86.
38.
Ponder, Stephen.1999. Managing the press: Origins of the media presidency, 1897-1933 . New York: St. Martin's.
39.
Powell, Richard J.1999. “Going public” revisited: Presidential speechmaking and the bargaining setting in Congress. Congress & the Presidency26:153-70.
40.
Public papers of the presidents, Reagan. 1986. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
41.
Ragsdale, Lyn.1998. Vital statistics on the presidency: Washington to Clinton . Rev. ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
42.
Walsh, Kenneth T.1996. Feeding the beast: The White House and the press. New York: Random House.
43.
Wanta, Wayne, Mary Ann Stephenson, Judy VanSlyke Turk, and Maxwell E. McCombs .1989. How president's State of Union talk influenced news media agendas. Journalism Quarterly66:537-41.
44.
Wildavsky, Aaron.1966. The two presidencies. Trans-Action4:7-14.
45.
Wood, B. Dan, and Jeffrey S. Peake .1998. The dynamics of foreign policy agenda setting. American Political Science Review92:173-84.
