Morality policy studies are generally constructed around the theoretical perspective of democratic responsiveness, whereby factors such as religious affiliation of citizens, public opinion, and partisanship affect adoption. The author expands morality policy theory to include the U.S. Supreme Court. She creates a measure of the “constitutional context” state legislators are faced with when debating morality policy proposals and develops a series of hypotheses regarding its effect on morality policy adoption. She tests these hypotheses by employing an event history model of state abortion policy adoptions from 1973 to 2000. The results indicate that the constitutional context has a significant effect on abortion policy adoption; however, its effect is conditioned by the state political environment.
Barrilleaux, Charles, and Michael Berkman .2003. Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policymaking. Political Research Quarterly56:409-17.
2.
Berkman, Michael B., and Robert E. O'Connor .1993. Do women legislators matter? Female legislators and state abortion policy. In Understanding the new politics of abortion, ed. Malcolm L. Goggin.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Berry, William D., and Frances Stokes Berry.1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review84:395-415.
4.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones .1997. Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science41:1414-61.
5.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Christopher Zorn .2002. Duration models for repeated events. Journal of Politics64:1069-94.
6.
Brace, Paul, Kellie Sims-Butler, Kevin Arceneaux, and Martin Johnson.2002. Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science46:173-89.
7.
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Kerry L. Haynie .1999. Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of gender and race. Journal of Politics61:658-79.
8.
Brisbin, Richard A., Jr.2001. From censorship to ratings: Substantive rationality, political entrepreneurship, and sex in the movies. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.New York: Chatham House.
9.
Burrell, Barbara C.1994. A woman's place is in the house: Campaigning for Congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Canon, Bradley C.1992. The Supreme Court as a cheerleader in politico-moral disputes . Journal of Politics54:637-53.
11.
Canon, Bradley C., and Charles A. Johnson .1999. Judicial policies: Implementation and impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press .
12.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson .1980. The two faces of issue voting . American Political Science Review74:78-91.
13.
Cleves, Mario A., William W. Gould, and Roberto G. Gutierrez .2002. An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
14.
Cohen, Jeffrey E., and Charles Barrilleaux .1993. Public opinion, interest groups, and public policy making: Abortion policy in the American states. In Understanding the new politics of abortion, ed. Malcolm L. Goggin.London: Sage.
15.
Collett, D.1994. Modeling survival data in medical research. London: Chapman & Hall.
16.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox.1992. Between two absolutes: Public opinion and the politics of abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Daynes, Byron W.1998. Pornography: Freedom of expression or sexual degradation ? In Moral controversies in American politics: Cases in social regulatory policy, ed. Raymond Tatalovich and Bryron W. Daynes.New York: M. E. Sharpe.
18.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright Jr. , and John P. McIver.1989. Political parties, public opinion, and state policy in the United States. American Political Science Review83:729-50.
19.
Fabrizio, Paul J.2001. Evolving into morality politics: U.S. Catholic Bishops' statements on U.S. politics from 1792 to present. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.New York: Chatham House .
20.
Fowler, Linda, and Ronald G. Shaiko .1987. The grass roots connection: Environmental activists and Senate roll calls. American Journal of Political Science31:484-510.
21.
Glick, Henry R.1970. Policy-making and the state supreme court: The judiciary as an interest group. Law & Society Review5 (2): 271-92.
22.
———. 1994. The impact of permissive judicial policies: The U.S. Supreme Court and the right to die. Political Research Quarterly47:207-22.
23.
Glick, Henry R., and Amy Hutchinson.2001. Physician-assisted suicide: Agenda setting and the elements of morality policy. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.New York: Chatham House.
24.
Goggin, Malcolm L., and Christopher Wlezien .1993. Abortion opinion and policy in the American states. In Understanding the new politics of abortion, ed. Malcolm L. Goggin.London: Sage.
25.
Gormley, William T., Jr.1986. Regulatory issue networks in a federal system. Polity18:595-620.
26.
Gray, Virginia.1973. Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review67:1174-85.
27.
Haider-Markel, Donald P.2001. Morality policy and individual-level political behavior: The case of legislative voting on lesbian and gay issues. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
28.
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kenneth J. Meier .1996. The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of the conflict. Journal of Politics58:332-49.
29.
Hansen, Susan.1993. Difference in public policies toward abortion: Electoral and policy context. In Understanding the new politics of abortion , ed. Malcolm L. Goggin.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Hojnacki, Marie, and David C. Kimball .1999. The who and how of organizations' lobbying strategies in committee. Journal of Politics61:999-1024.
31.
Kleinbaum, David G.1996. Survival analysis: A self-learning text. New York: Springer Verlag.
32.
Leuchtenburg, William.1995. The Supreme Court reborn: The constitutional revolution in the age of Roosevelt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Lowi, Theodore J.1972. Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review32:298-310.
34.
McFarlane, Debrorah R., and Kenneth J. Meier .2001. The politics of fertility control. New York: Chatham House .
35.
Meier, Kenneth J.1994. The politics of sin: Drugs, alcohol and public policy . Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
36.
———. 2001. Drugs, sex, rock and roll: Two theories of morality politics . In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.New York: Chatham House.
37.
Meier, Kenneth J., and Deborah R. McFarlane .1993. Abortion politics and abortion funding policy. In Understanding the new politics of abortion , ed. Malcolm L. Goggin.London: Sage.
38.
Mooney, Christopher Z.2001. The public clash of private values. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
39.
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee.1995. Legislating morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science39:599-627.
40.
———. 2001. The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American states. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
41.
Nice, David C.1992. The states and the death penalty. Western Political Quarterly45:1037-48.
42.
Norrander, Barbara, and Clyde Wilcox. 2001. Public opinion and policymaking in the states: The case of post-Roe abortion policy. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
43.
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro .1992. The rational public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Petrick, Michael J.1968. The Supreme Court and authority acceptance. Western Political Quarterly21:5-19.
45.
Pierce, Patrick A., and Donald E. Miller .2001. Variations in the diffusion of state lottery adoptions: How revenue dedication changes morality politics . In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
46.
Rosenberg, Gerald N.1991. The hollow hope. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Smith, Kevin B.2001. Clean thoughts and dirty minds: The politics of porn. In The public clash of private values, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
48.
Smith, T. Alexander.1975. The comparative policy process. Santa Barbara, CA: Clio Press.
49.
Steger, Mary Ann E., and Brent S. Steel.1998. Death penalty: Crime deterrent or legalized homicide? In Moral controversies in American politics: Cases in social regulatory policy, ed. Raymond Tatalovich and Bryron W. Daynes.New York: M. E. Sharpe.
50.
Stimson, James, Michael MacKuen, and Robert Erikson.1995. Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review89:543-66.
51.
Swers, Michele L.1998. Are women more likely to vote for women's issue bills than their male colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly3:435-47.
52.
Tatalovich, Raymond.1997. The politics of abortion in the United States and Canada . New York: M. E. Sharpe.
53.
Tatalovich, Raymond, and Byron W. Daynes, eds. 1998. Social regulatory policy: Moral controversies in American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
54.
Tatalovich, Raymond, and David Schier.1993. The persistence of ideological cleavage in voting on abortion legislation in the House of Representatives, 1973-1988 . In Understanding the new politics of abortion, ed. Malcolm L. Goggin.London: Sage.
55.
Therneau, Terry, M.2000. Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model. New York: Springer.
56.
Vanberg, Georg.2000. Establishing judicial independence in West Germany: The impact of opinion leadership and the separation of powers. Comparative Politics32 (3): 333-53.
57.
———. 2001. Legislative-judicial relations: A game-theoretic approach to constitutional review. American Journal of Political Science45:346-61.
58.
Walker, Jack L.1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states . American Political Science Review63:880-99.
59.
Welch, Susan.1985. Are women more liberal than men in the U.S. Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly10:125-34.
60.
Wetstein, Matthew E.1996. Abortion rates in the United States: The influence of opinion and policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
61.
Wilcox, Clyde.1996. Onward Christian soldiers? The Religious Right in American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview .
62.
Wlezian, Christopher.1995. The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science39:981-1000.
63.
Wright, John R.1996. Interest groups and Congress: Lobbying, contributions, and influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
