This article investigates the policy opportunities in presidential honeymoons. Specifically, after reviewing a standard (pivotal politics) model of lawmaking where presidents' election results are treated as exogenous, we develop a (honeymoon politics) model in which a president's election results are treated as endogenous—that is, where legislators' positions factor in the president's electoral results among their constituents. Applying both models to every newly elected president and corresponding Senate since 1932, comparative statics show that presidents' policy-making prospects always improve in “honeymoon” settings, though this effect varies depending on lawmakers' preference distribution, presidents' electoral coalition, and the threshold required to invoke cloture.
Arnold, R. Douglas.1990. The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Arrow, Kenneth J.1951. Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
3.
Barber, James D.1972. The presidential character: Predicting performance in theWhite House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Burns, James MacGregor.1965. Presidential government: The crucible of leadership. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Black, Duncan.1948. The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bond, Jon R., and Richard Fleisher .1990. The president in the legislative arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Brace, Paul, and Barbara Hinckley .1992. Follow the leader: Opinion polls and the modern presidents. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Brady, David W., and Volden.Craig1998. Revolving gridlock: Politics and policy from Carter to Clinton. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
Brody, Richard A.1991. Assessing the president: The media, elite opinion, and public support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Bunce, Valerie.1980. Changing leaders and changing policies: The impact of elite succession on budgetary priorities in democratic countries. American Journal of Political Science24:373-95.
11.
Cameron, Charles.2000. Veto bargaining: Presidents and the politics of negative power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes .1960. The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice.2005. Who leads whom? Presidents, policy making and the American public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Scott de Marchi. 2002. Presidential approval and legislative success . Journal of Politics64:491-509.
15.
Conley, Patricia Heidotting.2001. Presidential mandates: How elections shape the national agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Covington, Cary R.1988. Building presidential coalitions among cross pressured members of Congress. Western Politics Quarterly41:47-62.
17.
Covington, Cary R., Mark Wrighton, and Rhonda Kinney.1995. A “presidency-augmented” model of presidential success on house roll call votes. American Journal of Political Science39:1001-24.
18.
Dahl, Robert A.1990. Myth of the presidential mandate. Political Science Quarterly105:355-72.
19.
Derouen, Karl, Jr., Jeffrey S. Peake , and Kenneth Ward.2005. Presidential mandates and the dynamics of Senate advice and consent, 1885- 1996. American Politics Research33:106-31.
20.
Downs, Anthony.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
21.
Edwards, George C., III. 1983. The public presidency: The pursuit of popular support. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
———. 1989. At the margins: Presidential leadership of Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
———. 2003. On deaf ears: The limits of the bully pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Edwards, George C., III, and Andrew Barrett .2000. Presidential agenda-setting in Congress. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, ed. Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, 109-33. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
25.
Feld, Scott L., and Bernard Grofman.1987. Necessary and sufficient conditions for a majority winner in n-dimensional spatial voting games: An intuitive geometric approach. American Journal of Political Science31:709-28.
26.
Fiorina, Morris P.1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Fleisher, Richard, and Jon R. Bond.2004. The shrinking middle in the US Congress . British Journal of Political Science34:429-52.
28.
Frendreis, John, Raymond Tatalovich, and Jon Schaff.2001. Predicting legislative output in the first one-hundred days, 1897-1995. Political Research Quarterly54:853-70.
29.
Grossback, Lawrence J., David A. M. Peterson, and James A. Stimson .2005. Comparing competing theories on the causes of mandate perceptions. American Journal of Political Science49:406-19.
30.
Grossman, Michael Baruch, and Martha Joynt Kumar .1981. Portraying the president . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Hughes, William J.1995. The “not-so-genial” conspiracy: The New York Times and six presidential “honeymoons,” 1953-1993. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72:841-50.
32.
Jones, Charles O.1994. The presidency in a separated system. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
Kernell, Samuel.1997. Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership . 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
34.
King, Anthony.1983. Both ends of the avenue: The presidency, the executive branch, and Congress in the 1980s. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
35.
Krehbiel, Keith.1998. Pivotal politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Light, Paul C.1999. The president's agenda: Domestic policy choice from Kennedy to Clinton. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
Lockerbie, Brad, Stephen Borrelli, and Scott Hedger.1998. An integrative approach to modeling presidential success in Congress. Political Research Quarterly51:155-72.
38.
McCarty, Nolan M.1997. Presidential reputation and the veto. Economics and Politics9:1-26.
39.
McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal .2006. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
McKelvey, Richard D.1976. Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory12:472-82.
41.
Neustadt, Richard.1990. Presidential power and the modern presidents. New York: Free Press.
42.
Ostrom, Charles W., Jr., and Dennis M. Simon.1985. Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity. American Political Science Review79:334-58.
43.
Owen, Guillermo.1995. Game theory. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44.
Peterson, David A. M., Lawrence J. Grossback, James A. Stimson, and Amy Gangl.2003. Congressional response to mandate elections. American Journal of Political Science47:411-26.
45.
Peterson, Mark A.1990. Legislating together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Plott, Charles R.1967. A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review57:787-806.
47.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal .1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine Macdonald .1989. A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review83:93-121.
49.
Riker, William H.1980. Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. American Political Science Review74:432-46.
50.
Rivers, R. Douglas, and Nancy L. Rose.1985. Passing the president's program: Public opinion and presidential influence in Congress. American Journal of Political Science29:183-96.
51.
Rossiter, Clinton.1956. The American presidency. New York: New American Library of World Literature.
52.
Schofield, Norman.1978. Instability of simple dynamic games. Review of Economic Studies65:575-94.
53.
———. 1983. Generic instability of majority rule. Review of Economic Studies50:696-705.
54.
Schofield, Norman, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld.1988. The core and the stability of group choice in spatial voting games. American Political Science Review82:195-211.
55.
Skowronek, Stephen.1997. The politics presidents make: Leadership from John Adams to BillClinton. New York: Belknap.
56.
Sullivan, Terry.1988. Expectations, headcounts; and presidential coalitions in Congress. American Journal of Political Science32:567-89.
57.
———. 1990. Bargaining with the president. American PoliticalScience Review84:1167-96.
58.
Tsebelis, George.2002. Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
Wolfinger, Raymond E.1985. Dealignment, realignment, and mandates in the 1984 election . In The American elections of 1984, ed. Austin Ranney.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute andDuke University Press .
