Why are some foreign policy votes partisan and others bipartisan? The authors argue that an electoral connection drives partisanship in congressional foreign policy voting. Members of Congress depend on core supporters for mobilization and money, and primary voters are likely to follow the opinion cues of partisan elites; as a result, when Republican and Democratic opinion elites hold more distinct views on an issue, one may expect to observe more partisan behavior in Congress on both low and high-politics foreign policy issues. An empirical analysis of elite public opinion and congressional voting on foreign policy issues for six Congresses between 1975 and 1996 supports the elite opinion cleavage argument.
Abramowitz, Alan, and Kyle Saunders. 1998. Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics60 (3): 634-652.
2.
Abramson, Paul, John Aldrich, Jill Rickhauser, and David Rohde. 2006. Fear in the voting booth: The 2006 presidential election. Paper presented at the Wartime Election of 2004 Conference, Ohio State University, Columbus.
3.
Aldrich, John H.1983. A Downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review77 (4): 974-990.
4.
Aldrich, John H.1995. Why parties? The origin and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2000a. The consequences of party organization in the House: The role of the majority and minority parties in conditional party government. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, ed. Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, 31-72. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
6.
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2000b. The Republican revolution and the House Appropriations Committee. Journal of Politics62:1-33.
7.
Aldrich, John H., John L. Sullivan, and Eugene Borgida. 1989. Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates “waltz before a blind audience”?American Political Science Review83:123-141.
8.
Brambor, Thomas, William Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis14 (1): 63-82.
9.
Campbell, James E.2005. Why Bush won the presidential election of 2004: Incumbency, ideology, terrorism, and turnout. Political Science Quarterly120 (2): 219-241.
10.
Carmines, Edward, and James Stimson. 1981. Issue evolution, population replacement, and partisan change. American Political Science Review75 (1): 107-118.
11.
Destler, I. M., Leslie H. Gelb, and Anthony Lake. 1984. Our own worst enemy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12.
Fleisher, Richard, and Jon R. Bond. 2000. Polarized politics: Does it matter? In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, ed. Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, 186-200. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
13.
Ghosn, Faten, Glenn Palmer, and Stuart Bremer. 2004. The MID3 data set, 1993–2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science21:133-154.
14.
Gowa, Joanne. 1998. Politics at the water's edge: Parties, voters, and the use of force abroad. International Organization52 (2): 307-324.
15.
Holsti, Ole R.2004. Public opinion and American foreign policy. Rev. ed.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
Holsti, Ole R., and James N. Rosenau. 1999. Foreign Policy Leadership Project, 1976-1996. ICPSR Research Study no. 2614. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
17.
Hurwitz, Jon, and Mark Peffley. 1987. How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review81 (4): 1099-1120.
18.
Jacobson, Gary. 2000. Party polarization in national politics: The electoral connection. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, ed. Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, 9-30. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
19.
Jacobson, Gary. 2005. Polarized politics and the 2004 congressional and presidential elections. Political Science Quarterly120 (2): 199-218.
20.
Krauthammer, Charles. 1990. The unipolar moment. Foreign Affairs70 (1): 23-33.
21.
Layman, Geoffrey, and Thomas Carsey. 2002. Party polarization and conflict extension in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 786-802.
22.
Levering, Ralph B.1989. Public opinion, foreign policy, and American politics since the 1960s. Diplomatic History13:383-393.
23.
Martin, William. 1999. The Christian right and American foreign policy. Foreign Policy, Spring, pp. 66-80.
24.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
McCormick, James M., and Eugene R. Wittkopf. 1990. Bipartisanship, partisanship, and ideology in congressional-executive foreign policy relations, 1947-1988. Journal of Politics52 (4): 1077-1100.
26.
McCormick. 1992. At the water's edge: The effects of party, ideology, and issues on congressional foreign policy voting, 1947-1988. American Politics Quarterly20:26-53.
27.
Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.
28.
Meernik, James. 1993. Presidential support in Congress: Conflict and consensus on foreign and defense policy. Journal of Politics55 (3): 569-587.
29.
Miller, Gary, and Norman Schofield. 2003. Activists and partisan realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review97 (2): 245-260.
30.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1948. Politics among nations. New York: Knopf.
31.
Oldfield, Duane, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1989. Reconsidering the two presidencies. Society26 (July/August): 54-59.
32.
Powlick, Philip J., and Andrew Z. Katz. 1998. Defining the American public opinion/foreign policy nexus. Mershon International Studies Review42 (1): 29-61.
33.
Prins, Brandon C., and Bryan W. Marshall. 2001. Congressional support of the president: A comparison of foreign, defense, and domestic policy decision-making during and after the cold war. Presidential Studies Quarterly31 (4): 660-679.
34.
Rohde, David W.1991. Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Rohde, David W.1994. Partisanship, leadership and congressional assertiveness in foreign and defense policy. In The new politics of American foreign policy, ed. David A. Deese, 76-101. New York: St. Martin's.
36.
Schraufnagel, Scot, and Stephen Shellman. 2001. The two presidencies, 1984-98: A replication and extension. Presidential Studies Quarterly31 (4): 699-707.
37.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.
38.
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1966/1991. The two presidencies. Reprinted in The two presidencies: A quarter century assessment,ed. Steven A. Shull. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
39.
Wohlforth, William. 1999. The stability of a unipolar world. International Security24 (1): 5-41.
40.
Wright, Gerald C.1989. Policy voting in the U.S. Senate: Who is represented?Legislative Studies Quarterly14 (4): 465-486.
41.
Zaller, John. 1991. Information, values, and opinion. American Political Science Review85 (4): 1215-1237.
42.
Zorn, Christopher. 2001. Estimating between and within-cluster covariate effects, with an application to models of international disputes. International Interactions27 (4): 433-445.
