In a series of publications, Verba and Nie and their coauthors argued that participatory acts vary along a number of dimensions, and that acts having similar dimensional profiles would constitute distinct modes of participation (Verba and Nie 1972; Verba, Nie, and Kim 1971, 1978; Verba, et al., 1973). In the realm of electoral participation, these investigators postulated two modes, voting and campaigning. Campaigning was thought to encompass a variety of behaviors, including working for a candidate or party, trying to persuade someone how to vote, and making a campaign contribution. A new dimensional typology, presented here, predicts that working in a campaign and contributing to political actors constitute separate modes of participation. We confirm these predictions by performing confirmatory factor analyses of participation items from the 1980-2004 American National Election Studies. We also find that vote persuasion is best modeled as a measure of political discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, Paul, and William Claggett. 2001. “Recruitment and Political Participation”. Political Research Quarterly54: 905-916.
2.
Arbuckle, James L., and Werner Wothke. 1999. Amos 4.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.
3.
Bentler, P. M, and D. G. Bonett. 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures”. Psychological Bulletin88: 588-606.
4.
Booth, John A.1976. “A Replication: Modes of Political Participation in Costa Rica”. Western Political Quarterly (December): 627-633.
5.
Brady, Henry E., Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists”. American Political Science Review93: 153-168.
6.
Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit”. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, eds., Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 136-162. Newbury Park CA: Sage
7.
Byrne, Barbara. 2001. Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Claggett, William, and Philip H. Pollock III. 2003. “Revisiting and Revising Verba and Nie: The Modes of Political Participation, 1980-2000”. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
9.
Fielder, Maureen. 1975. “The Participation of Women in American Politics”. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
10.
Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment”. American Political Science Review94 (3): 653-663.
11.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass”. American Political Science Review86 (1): 70-86.
12.
Jöreskog, K. G.1969. “A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Analysis”. Psychometrika34: 183-202.
13.
Kline, Rex. 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equations Modeling. New York: Guilford.
14.
Marsh, H. W., Kit-Tai Hau, and Z. Wen. 2004. “In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings”. Structural Equation Modeling11: 320-341.
15.
Powell, Eleanor Neff, Lynda W. Powell, Randall K. Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox. 2005. “Online and Offline Political Contributions: A Preliminary Analysis”. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association..
16.
Rose, Lawrence. 1976. Patterns of Political Perceptions and Behavior in Two Norwegian Communities. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
17.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
18.
Verba, Sidney, and Norman Nie. 1972. Participation In America: Social Equality and Political Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Verba, Sidney, Norman Nie, Ana Barbic, Galen Irwin, Henk Molleman, and Goldie Shabad. 1973. “The Modes of Participation: Continuities in Research”. Comparative Political Studies6: 235-250.
20.
Verba, Sidney, Norman Nie, and Jae-On Kim. 1971. The Modes of Democratic Participation: A Cross-National Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics 2, no. 01-013.
21.
Verba, Sidney, Norman Nie, and Jae-On Kim. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Schlozman and Henry Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Weilhouwer, Peter W., and Brad Lockerbie. 1994. “Party Contacting and Political Participation, 1952-90”. American Journal of Political Science38 (1): 211-229.
24.
Welch, Susan. 1975. “Dimensions of Political Participation in a Canadian Sample”. Canadian Journal of Political Science8: 553-559.
25.
White, James W. 1975. “Status Differences in Political Participation in Tokyo”. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association.
