Local Government Autonomy and State Reliance on Special District Governments: A Reassessment

Abstract

The notion that local government autonomy has important implications for a state’s local government structure is fast approaching conventional wisdom. Negative binomial regression is used to analyze the link between the administrative, fiscal, functional, and structural autonomy permitted to municipal and county governments and the number of special districts in each state over the 1992-2002 period. This pooled analysis reveals that this relationship to befar more limited than previously thought. This study challenges the findings of previous studies showing that limitations on local autonomy strongly encourage a splintering of local government authority due to the creation of numerous special districts. Tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) were the only restrictions that were consistently related to a greater reliance on special district governments, and only when both municipal and county governments were both strongly restricted. For the most part, state reliance on special district governments was unaffected by the extent of restrictions placed on local general-purpose governments with regard to debt and permitted functions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) . 1981. Measuring Local Discretionary Authority. Washington, DC: ACIR.

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) . 1993. State Laws Governing Local Government Structure and Administration. Washington, DC: ACIR.

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) . 1995. Tax and Expenditure Limits on Local Government. Washington, DC: ACIR.

Bollens, Scott A. 1986. “Examining the Link Between State Policy and the Creation of Local Special Districts.” State and Local Government Review 18 (3): 117-124.

Bowler, Shaun , and Todd Donovan . 2004. “Evolution in State Governance Structures: Unintended Consequences of State Tax and Expenditure Limitations.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 189-196.

Burns, Nancy . 1994. Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cameron, A. Colin , and Pravin K. Trivedi . 2001. “Essentials of Count Data Regression” in Badi H. Baltagi , ed., A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, pp. 331-348.. Oxford: Blackwell.

Carr, Jered B. 2004. “Whose Game do we Play? Local Government Boundary Change and Metropolitan Governance.” In Richard C. Feiock , ed., Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation pp. 212-239. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Feiock, Richard C. , and Jered B. Carr . 2001. “Incentives, Entrepreneurs, and Boundary Change: A Collective Action Framework.” Urban Affairs Review 36 (3): 382-405.

10.

Foster, Kathryn A. 1997. Political Economy of Special-Purpose Government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

11.

King, Gary . 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

12.

King, Gary , Michael Tomz , and Jason Wittenberg . 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 341-355.

13.

Krane, Dale , Platon N. Rigos , and Melvin B. Hill, Jr. , eds. 2001. Home Rule in America: A Fifty State Handbook. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

14.

Lewis, Paul G. 2000. “The Durability of Local Government Structure: Evidence from California.” State and Local Government Review 32 (1): 34-48.

15.

MacManus, Susan A. 1981. “Special District Governments: A Note on Their Use as Property Tax Relief Mechanisms in the 1970s.” Journal of Politics 43(November): 1206-1214.

16.

MacManus, Susan A. 1982. “Special Districts: A Common Solution to Political Pressures Stemming from City-County Fiscal Inequalities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 4 (2): 1-10.

17.

Marando, Vincent , and Mavis Mann Reeves . 1993. “County Government Structural Reform: Influence of State, Region, and Urbanization.” Publius 23 (Winter): 41-52.

18.

McCabe, Barbara C. 1997. “Revenue, Structure and the Grassroots: The Causes and Consequences of State Tax and Expenditure Limits on Local Governments.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Florida State University.

19.

McCabe, Barbara C. 2000. “Special-District Formation Among the States.” State and Local Government Review 32 (2): 121-131.

20.

Miller, Gary J. 1981. Cities by Contract: The Politics of Municipal Incorporation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

21.

Mullins, Daniel R. , and Philip G. Joyce . 1996. “Tax and Expenditure Limitations and State and Local Fiscal Structure: An Empirical Assessment.” Public Budgeting and Finance Spring: 75-101.

22.

Stephens, G. Ross , and Nelson Wikstrom . 1998. “Trends in Special Districts.” State and Local Government Review 30 (2): 129-138.

23.

Tomz, Michael , Jason Wittenberg , and Gary King . 2003. Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu/

24.

US Bureau of the Census . 1992, 1997, 2002. Census of Governments: Volume 1 Government Organization. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.