Focused on High Court behavior in Malawi and Zambia, this article examines the factors affecting judicial assertiveness vis a vis other power-holders in the state. Drawing from strategic understandings of judicial decisionmaking, the analysis focuses on whether and how political factors shape judicial behavior. The findings lend support for those who have emphasized such factors, in particular by indicating that judicial assertiveness is somewhat dependent on larger political conditions. The findings also suggest that the strategic view can be refined. For one, scholars should more directly consider how political factors interact with judicial preferences to shape decisionmaking. Further, scholars should appreciate how political conditions may encourage judges to embrace positions of political neutrality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Becker. Theodore. 1970. Comparative Judicial Politics: The Political Functioning of Courts. Chicago: Rand McNally.
3.
Bratton, Michael, and Nicolas van de Walle. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
6.
Epstein Lee, and Carol Mershon. 1996. “Measuring Political Preferences.”American Journal of Political Science40 (1): 261-294.
7.
Flango, Victor E., Lettie McSpadden-Wenner, and Manfred W. Wenner. 1975. “The Concept of Judicial Role: A Methodological Note.”American Journal of Political Science19 (2): 277-289.
8.
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Gloppen, Siri. 2003. “The Accountability Function of Courts in Tanzania and Zambia.”Democratization10 (4): 112-136.
10.
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations In Argentina Under Dictatorship and Democracy.”American Political Science Review96 (2): 291-303.
11.
Helmke, Gretchen. 2003“Checks and Balances by Other Means: Strategic Defection and Argentina’s Supreme Court in the 1990s.”Comparative Politics35 (2): 213-230.
12.
Herron, Erik S., and Kirk A.. Randazzo. 2003. “The Relationship Between Independence and Judicial Review in Post-Communist Courts.”Journal of Politics65 (2): 422-438.
13.
Iaryczower, Matias, Pablo Spiller, and Mariano Tommasi. 2002. “Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935-1998.”American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 699-716.
14.
Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996. “On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.”Law and Society Review30 (1): 87-120.
15.
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2002. “Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.”Journal of Democracy13 (2): 51-65.
16.
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.”Journal of Democracy5 (1): 55-69.
17.
Osei-Hwedie, Bertha1998. “The Role of Ethnicity in Multi-Party Politics in Malawi and Zambia.”Journal of Contemporary African Studies16 (2): 227-248.
18.
Posner, Daniel N.2004. “The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi.”American Political Science Review98 (4): 529-546.
19.
Salokar, Rebecca Mae. 1992. The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
Segal, Jeffrey A.1997. “Separation of Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.”American Political Science Review91 (1): 28-44.
21.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Songer, Donald R., and Susan Haire. 1992. “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the US Courts of Appeals.”American Journal of Political Science36 (4): 963-982.
23.
Spiller, Pablo T., and Rafael Gely. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of US Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949-1988.”Rand Journal of Economics23 (4): 463-492.
24.
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.”American Journal of Political Science45 (2): 346-361.
25.
VonDoepp, Peter. 2005. “The Problem of Judicial Control in Africa’s Neopatrimonial Democracies: Malawi and Zambia.”Political Science Quarterly120 (2): 275-301.
