This article explores the impact of cognitive style, as measured by need to evaluate and need for cognition, on information acquisition during the 2000 U.S. presidential campaign. Using data from the 2000 National Election Study I show that both constructs are related to measures of candidate information, i.e., correct ideological placement, correct policy placement, and number of candidate articulations; but that need to evaluate has a much stronger and more consistent effect than does need for cognition. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahlering, Robert F.1987. “Need for Cognition, Attitudes, and the 1984 Presidential Election.”Journal of Research in Personality21: 100-102.
2.
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Bader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.”American Journal of Political Science49: 388-405.
4.
Bennett, Linda., and Stephen E. Bennett1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions.”American Politics Quarterly17: 105-122.
5.
Bennett, Stephen. E.1988. “Know Nothings Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today.”Social Science Quarterly68: 476-490.
6.
Bennett, Stephen. E.1989. “Trends in Americans’ Political Information.”American Politics Quarterly17: 422-435.
7.
Bishop, George F., Robert W. Oldendick, and Alfred J. Tuchfarber. 1978. “The Presidential Debates as a Device for Increasing the ‘Rationality’ of Electoral Behavior.” In George Bishop, Robert Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Meadow, eds. The Presidential Debates. New York: Praeger.
8.
Bizer, George, Jon Krosnick, Allyson Holbrook, Richard Petty, Derek Rucker, S. Christian Wheeler. 2002. The Impact of Personality on Political Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Need to Evaluate and Need for Cognition. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
9.
Bizer, George, Jon Krosnick, Allyson Holbrook, S. Christian Wheeler, Derek Rucker, and Richard Petty. 2004. “Impact of Personality on Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Political Processes: The Effects of Need to Evaluate.”Journal of Personality72: 995-1027.
10.
Brady, Henry, and Johnston, Richard. 1987. “What’s the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In G. Orren and N. Polsby, eds. Media and Momentum. Chatham, NJ: Chatam House.
11.
Campbell, Angus, Phillip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and David E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
12.
Cacioppo, John, and Richard Petty. 1982. “The Need for Cognition.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42: 116-131.
13.
Cacioppo, John, and Richard Petty. 1984. “Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition.”Journal of Personality Assessment48: 306-307.
14.
Cacioppo, John. T., Richard E. Petty, Chuan Feng Kao, and Regina Rodriguez. 1986. “Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 1032-1043.
15.
Cacioppo, John T., Richard E. Petty, Jeffery Feinstein, and Blair Jarvis. 1996. “Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin119: 197-253.
16.
Chaffee, Steven, and Jack Dennis. 1979. “Presidential Debates: An Assessment.” In Austin Ranney, ed., The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
17.
Cohen, Arthur P., Ezra Stotland, and Donald M. Wolfe. 1955. “An Experimental Investigation of Need for Cognition.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 51: 291-294.
18.
Condra, Mollie B.1992. “Link Between Need for Cognition and Political Interest, Involvement, and Media Use.”Psychology29: 13-17.
19.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press
20.
DeSart, Jay. A.1995. “Information Processing and Party Neutrality: A Reexamination of the Party Decline Thesis.”Journal of Politics57: 776-795
21.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
22.
Eveland, William P., and Dietrm A. Scheufele. 2000. “Connecting News Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation.”Political Communication17: 215-237
23.
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?”British Journal of Political Science23: 409-451
25.
Hastie, Reid., and Bernadette Park. (1986) “The Relationship Between Momory and Judgements Depends on Whether the Judgement Task is Memory-based or On-line.”Psychological Review93: 258-268.
26.
Holbrook, Thomas M. (1996). Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
Holbrook, Thomas M. (1999). “Political Learning From Presidential Debates”Political Behavior21: 67-89.
28.
Holbrook, Thomas M. (2002). “Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap.”Political Communication19: 437-454
29.
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Kathleen A. Dolan. 2004. “Wishful Thinking in the 2000 Presidential Election.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
30.
Jarvis, W. Blair, and Richard E. Petty. 1996. “The Need to Evaluate.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70: 172-194.
31.
Joslyn, R.1990. “Election Campaigns as Occasions for Civic Education.” In D. Swanson and D. Nimmo, eds., New Directions in Political Communication: A Resource Book. Thousand Oacks, CA: Sage.
32.
Kam, Cindy D.2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences.”Political Behavior27: 163-182.
33.
Key, V. O., Jr.1966. Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
34.
Kwak, Nojin. 1999. “Revisiting the Knowledge Gap.”Communication Research26: 385-413.
35.
Lau, Richard. 1986. “Political lSchemata, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior.” In Richard Lau and David Sears, eds., Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
Lemert, James B.1993. “Do Televised Presidential Debates Help Inform Voters?”Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media37: 83-94.
37.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Luskin, Robert C.1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.”American Journal of Political Science31: 856-899
39.
Luskin, Robert C.1990. “Explaining Political Sophistication.”Political Behavior12: 331-361.
40.
Marcus, George E.2000. “Emotions in Politics.”Annual Review of Political Science3: 221-250.
41.
Marcus, George E., and Michael B. MacKuen. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns. American Political Science Review75: 1005-1070.
42.
Marcus, George E., W. Russell. Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Marcus, George E., John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, and Sandra L. Wood. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Miller, Arthur, and Michael MacKuen. 1979. “Informing the Electorate: A National Study” In Sidney Kraus, ed., Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
45.
Miyo, Y.1983. “Knowledge Gap Hypothesis and Media Dependency.” In R. N. Bostrom, ed., Communication Yearbook 7. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46.
Mondak, Jeffery J.2001. Developing Valid Knowledge Scales. American Journal of Political Science45: 224-238.
47.
Moore, David. W.1987. “Political Campaigns and the Knowledge-Gap Hypothesis.”Public Opinion Quarterly51: 186-200.
48.
Popkin, Samuel L.1991. Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Price, Vincent, and John Zaller. 1993. “Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and their Implications For Research.”Public Opinion Quarterly57: 133-164
50.
Rabinowitz, George., and Stuart Elaine MacDonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Voting.”American Political Science Review83: 93-121.
51.
Rahn, Wendy, Jon Krosnick, and Marijk Breuning. 1994. “Rationalization and Derivation Process in Survey Studies of Candidate Evaluations.”American Journal of Political Science38: 582-600.
52.
Smith, Eric R. A. N.1989. Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
Tidwell, Pamela S., Cyril J. Sadowski, and Lia M. Pate. 2000. Relationship Between Need for Cognition, Knowledge, and Verbal Ability. Journal of Psychology134: 634-645.
54.
Tormala, Zakary L., and Richard E. Petty. 2001. “On-line Versus Memory-Based Processing: The Role of ‘Need to Evaluate’ in Person Perception.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27: 1599-1612.
55.
Viswanath, K., and John R. Finnegan, Jr.1996. “The Knowledge Gap Hypothesis Twenty-Five Years Later.” In B. Berelson, ed., Communication Yearbook 19. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
56.
Zaller, John. 1992. Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
