A growing body of work examines the consequences of unequal participation in American democracy for electoral outcomes. However, this scholarship has ignored the potential impact of unequal voting for the quality of dynamic representation in the American political system. Using data from the General Social Survey (GSS), we examine the dynamic relationship between the policy preferences of voters and nonvoters in the American electorate. Further, we assess how unequal participation—and the incentives that it may give to policymaking elites—may moderate the relationship between the mass public and policy outcomes. Our analysis reveals that the policy preferences of voters and nonvoters respond in similar ways to the political and economic environment. In addition, we find no evidence that national policymaking elites are differentially responsive to changes in the preferences of voters and nonvoters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beck, Nathaniel. 1990. Estimating Dynamic Models Using Kalman Filtering. Political Analysis. 1: 121-156.
2.
Bennett, Steven, and David Resnick. 1990. “The Implications of Nonvoting for Democracy in the United States.”American Journal of Political Science34: 771-802.
3.
Brunell, Thomas L., and John DiNardo. 2004. “A Propensity Reweighting Approach to Simulating the Partisan Effects of Full Turnout in American Presidential Elections.”Political Analysis12: 28-45.
4.
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1986. Democracy in the Making: American Government and Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, David Brady, John Cogan. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.”American Political Science Review96: 127-140.
6.
Citrin, Jack, Eric Schickler, and John Sides. 2003.” What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections.”American Journal of Political Science47: 75-90.
7.
DeBoef, Suzanna, and James A. Stimson. 1995. “Dynamic Structure of Congressional Elections.”Journal of Politics57: 630-648.
8.
DeNardo, James. 1980. “Turnout and the Vote: The Joke’s on the Democrats.”American Political Science Review74: 406-442.
9.
Durr, Robert H.1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?”American Political Science Review87 (1): 158-170.
10.
Erikson, Robert S.1971. “The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting.”American Political Science Review65: 1018-1032.
11.
Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Fenno, Richard. 1977. “U.S. House Members and Their Constituencies.”American Political Science Review71: 883-917.
13.
Highton, Benjamin, and Raymond E. Wolfinger. 2001. “The Political Implications of Higher Turnout.”British Journal of Political Science31: 179-223.
14.
Key, V. O.1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
15.
Kellstedt, Paul, Gregory E. McAvoy, and James A. Stimson. 1996. “Dynamic Analysis with Latent Constructs.”Political Analysis5: 113-150.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision-Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.”Journal of Politics58 (1): 169-200.
19.
Mondak, Jeffrey J.1995. “Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents.”Journal of Poltiics57: 1043-1069.
20.
Nagel, Jack H., and John McNulty. 1996. “Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections.”American Political Science Review90: 780-793.
21.
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1983. “The Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.”American Political Science Review77: 175-190.
22.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward. 1988. Why Americans Don’t Vote. New York: Pantheon.
23.
Rothenberg, Lawrence, and Mitchell Sanders. 2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress”American Journal of Political Science44: 310-319.
24.
Shaffer, Steven D.1982. “Policy Differences Between Voters and Nonvoters in American Elections.”Western Political Quarterly35: 496-510.
25.
Smith, Mark A.2000. “Public Opinion, Elections, and Representation within a Market Economy: Does the Structural Power of Business Undermine Popular Sovereignty?”American Journal of Political Science43 (3): 842-863.
26.
Stimson, James A.1991. Public Opinion in America, 1st ed.Boulder, CO: Westview.
27.
Stimson, James A.1999. Public Opinion in America, 2nd ed.Boulder, CO: Westview.
28.
Stimson, James A., Michael B. MacKuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.”American Political Science Review89: 543-565.
29.
Tucker, Harvey J., and Arnold Vedlitz. 1986. “Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections?”American Political Science Review87: 1291-1298.
30.
Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.
31.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.”American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 981-1000.
33.
Wlezien, Christopher, and Micahel Goggin. 1993. “The Courts, Interest Groups, and Public Opinion about Abortion.”Political Behavior15: 381-405.
