Recent research has suggested that punctuated equilibrium models best describe the outputs of policymakers. While this literature has convincingly demonstrated that the distributions of policy outputs conform to the expectations of punctuated equilibrium theory, little attention has been paid to testing hypotheses related to the causes of punctuated equilibrium distributions. This research note illustrates a method for testing hypotheses related to punctuated equilibrium theory with a test of the effects of congressional reorganization. The results suggest that congressional reorganization has made the budgetary outputs of Congress less consistent with punctuated equilibrium theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Groseclose, Tim, and David C. King. 2001. “Committee Theories Reconsidered.” In Lawrence C. Dood and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
3.
Hall, Richard. 1989. “Committee Decision Making in the Postreform Congress.” In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4.
John, Peter. 2003. “Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change?”Policy Studies Journal31 (4): 481-498.
5.
Jones, Bryan D.2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Jones, Bryan D., Heather Larsen, and Tracy Sulkin. 2003. “Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions.”American Political Science Review97 (1): 151-169.
7.
Jordan, Meghan M.2003. “Punctuations and Agendas: A New Look at Local Government Budget Expenditures.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22 (3): 345-360.
8.
Oleszek, Walter J.2001. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 5th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
9.
Peterson, Mark A.1990. Legislating Together: The White House and Capital Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron B. Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington and Dashed in Oakland, 3rd ed.Los Angeles: University of California Press.
11.
Robinson, Scott E.2004. “Punctuated Equilibrium, Bureaucratization, and Budget Changes in Schools.”Policy Studies Journal32 (1): 25-39.
12.
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
True, James L., Bryan D. Jones, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 1999. “Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in American Policymaking.” In Paul Sabatier, ed., Theories of the Policy Process. Denver, CO: Westview.
