Lesbians, gays, and bisexuals (LGBs) are far more likely than heterosexuals to support the Democratic Party and its candidates. But is this support due to the Democratic Party support for the civil rights agendas of historically disadvantaged groups, or is it based on other factors? In this article, we use the issue of same-sex marriage to attempt to explain the nature of the sexual identity gap. We demonstrate that a substantial portion of LGBs place a great deal of importance on winning healthcare and other employee benefits for their spouses, but that they are less concerned about having legally recognized marriages. Furthermore, we find that it is the goal of acquiring spousal benefits, not the right to marry, that influences the degree to which LGBs support the Democratic Party. We conclude that the sexual identity gap is generated more from LGB concerns about acquiring tangible economic benefits than from an interest in pursuing civil rights.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, Paul R., and Charles W. Ostrom. 1994. “Question Wording and Partisanship: Change and Continuity in Party Loyalties During the 1992 Election Campaign.”Public Opinion Quarterly58: 21-48.
2.
Altimari, Daniela. 2005. “Division Over Civil Unions; Some Gays Question Strategy of Marriage or Nothing.”Hartford Courant (February 7): A1-A1.
3.
Altman, Dennis. 1994. Power and Community: Organizational and Cultural Responses to AIDS. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
4.
Anders, Christopher. 1999. “Lesbian and Gay Rights During President Clinton’s Second Term.” A working paper published by Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights. Accessible on http://archive.aclu.org/congress/lg011599a.html.
5.
Bailey, Robert W.1999. Gay Politics, Urban Politics: Identity and Economics in the Urban Setting. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Bell, Alan P., and Martin S. Weinberg. 1978. Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women. New York: Simon and Schuster
7.
Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial lSociety: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Berry, Jeffrey A.1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9.
Chaney, Carole Kennedy, R. Michael Alvarez, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980-1992.”Political Research Quarterly51: 311-339.
10.
Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1988. “Feminist and the Gender Gap.”Journal of Politics50: 985-1010.
11.
Conway, Margaret M., Gertrude A. Steuernagel, and David W. Ahern. 1997. Women & Political Participation, Cultural Change in the Political Arena. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
12.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, and Clyde Wilcox. 1991. “Feminism and the Gender Gap—A Second Look.”Journal of Politics53: 1111-1122.
13.
Cook, Timothy E.1999. “The Empirical Study of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Politics: Assessing the First Wave of Research.”American Political Science Review93 (3): 679-692.
14.
Dawson, Michael. C.1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Edelman, Murray S.1993. “Understanding the Gay and Lesbian Vote in ’92.”Public Perspective4 (3): 32-33.
16.
Egan, Patrick J., and Kenneth Sherrill. 2005. “Marriage and the Shifting Priorities of New Generation of Lesbians and Gays.”Political Science and Politics38: 229-232.
17.
Erie, Steven P, and Martin Rein. 1988. “Women and the Welfare State,” In Carol M. Mueller, ed., Democracy’s Feast: Elections in America, pp. 195-219. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
18.
Goldstein, Kenneth, Michael Franz, and Travis Ridout. 2002. “Political Advertising in 2000.” Combined File [dataset]. Final Release. Madison, WI: The Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.
19.
Hertzog, Mark. 1996. The Lavender Vote: Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals in American Electoral Politics. New York: New York University Press.
20.
Kaufmann, Karen M., and John R. Petrocik. 1999. “Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.”American Journal of Political Science43 (3): 864-887.
21.
Kenski, Henry C.1988. “The Gender Factor in a Changing Electorate,” In Carol Mueller, ed., The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence, pp. 173-191. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
Kinder, Donald R., and Nicholas Winter. 2001. “Exploring the Racial Divide: Blacks, Whites, and Opinion on National Policy.”American Journal of Political Science45: 439-456.
23.
Krouwel, André, and Jan Willem Duyvendak. 2000. “The Private and the Public: Gay and Lesbian Issues in Political Science.” In Theo Sandfort, Judith Schuyf, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Jeffrey Weeks, eds., Lesbian and Gay Studies: An Introductory, Interdisciplinary Approach, pp. 113-131. London: Sage.
24.
Norrander, Barbara. 1999. “The Evolution of the Gender Gap.”Public Opinion Quarterly63 (4): 566-576.
25.
Piven, Frances F.1985. “Women and the State: Ideology, Power and the Welfare State.” In Alice S. Rossi, ed., Gender and the Life Course, pp. 265-287. New York: Aldine.
26.
Rosenthal, Donald B.1996. “Gay and Lesbian Political Mobilization and Regime Responsiveness in Four New York Cities.”Urban Affairs Review32: 45-70.
27.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends From the 1960s to the 1980s.”Public Opinion Quarterly50: 42-61.
28.
Shingles, Richard D.1981. “Black Consiousness and Political Participation.”American Political Science Review75 (1): 76-91.
29.
Tourangeau, Roger, and Tom W. Smith. 1996. “Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context.”Public Opinion Quarterly60: 275-304.
30.
Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Political Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.
