I model the ideological representativeness of state legislative committees and their majority-party slates, testing hypotheses derived from extant models of committees and institutional choice. Committee representativeness and the representativeness of majority-party slates vary across states as a function of their effective number of parties and professionalization, but the jurisdiction of a committee has little discernible effect on representativeness of either. A possible mechanism is that competitive parties create committees that more closely adhere to the party ratio of the chamber, eliminating many possible outlying committees.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, E. Scott, and John Lapinski. 1997. “Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach.”American Journal of Political Science41: 895-918.
2.
Battista, James Coleman. 2003. “An Ambition-Theoretic Approach to Legislative Organizational Choice.”Legislative Studies Quarterly28: 333-355.
3.
Battista, James Coleman. 2004. “Reexamining Legislative Committee Representativeness in the States.”State Politics and Policy Quarterly4: 161-180.
4.
Citizen’s Conference on State Legislatures. 1971. State Legislatures: An Evaluation of Their Effectiveness. New York: Praeger.
5.
Cox, Gary W., Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Fenno, Jr., Richard F.1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
7.
Gilligan, Thomas W. and Keith Krehbiel. 1987. “Collective Decision-Making and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures.”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization.
8.
Gilligan, Thomas W. and Keith Krehbiel. 1989. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules With a Heterogeneous Committee.”American Journal of Political Science33: 459-490.
9.
Groseclose, Tim. 1994. “Testing Committee Composition Hypotheses for the U.S. Congress.”Journal of Politics56: 440-458.
10.
Hall, Richard L., and Bernard Grofman. 1990. “The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias.”American Political Science Review84: 1149-1166.
11.
Hedlund, Ronald D., and Keith E. Hamm. 1996. “Poltitical Parties as Vehicles for Organizing U.S. State Legislative Committees.”Legislative Studies Quarterly21: 383-408.
12.
Key, Jr., V. O.1949. Southern Politics in States and Nation. New York: Knopf.
13.
Kollman, Ken, and Pradeep Chhibber. 1998. “Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States.”American Political Science Review92: 329-342.
14.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Londregan, John, and James M. Snyder. 1994. “Comparing Committee and Floor Preferences.”Legislative Studies Quarterly19: 233-266.
17.
Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
Overby, L. Marvin and Thomas A. Kazee. 2000. “Outlying Committees in the Statehouse: An Examination of the Prevalence of Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.”Journal of Politics62: 701-728.
19.
Overby, L. Marvin, Thomas A. Kazee, and David W. Prince. 2004. “Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.”Legislative Studies Quarterly29: 81-107.
20.
Prince, David W., and L. Marvin Overby. 2005. “Legislative Organization Theory and Committee Preference Outliers in State Senates.”State Politics and Policy Quarterly5: 68-87.
21.
Rosenthal, Alan. 1971. The Scope of Legislative Reform: An Introduction. In Donald G. Herzberg and Alan Rosentha, eds., Strengthening the States: Essays on Legislative Reform. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
22.
Rosenthal, Alan. 1974. Legislative Performance in the States: Explorations of Committee Behavior. New York: Free Press.
23.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.”American Political Science Review81: 85-104.
24.
Squire, Peverill. 1988. “Member Career Opportunities and the Internal Organization of Legislatures.”Journal of Politics50: 726-744.
25.
Squire, Peverill. 2000. “Uncontested Seats in State Legislative Elections.”Legislative Studies Quarterly25: 131-146.
26.
Weingast, Barry R., and William J. Marshall. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; Or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.”Journal of Political Economy96: 132-163.
27.
Wright, Gerald C., and Brian F. Schaffner. 2002. “The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures.”American Political Science Review96: 367-379.
