Attempts to explain the effects of social class on electoral choices have focused on the relative impact of sociological, or “bottom-up,” versus political, or “top-down,” factors. We examine these contending approaches in post-Communist Russia, which has undergone both a significant economic transformation and major shifts in the politicization of class by its main electoral contenders, making it an informative context in which to examine competing explanations of the class-vote relationship. The analysis is based on data from five nationwide surveys conducted over the period 1993-2001 and provides evidence that an association between class position and presidential choice emerged in the mid-1990s in which the two largest classes, the working class and professional and managerial workers, provided a stable basis of support for the main free market versus interventionist axis of political division. These findings indicate the presence of rapid political learning among Russians and the resilience of class-based preferences despite Putin’s centrist political program
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alford, Robert R.1963. Party and Society. The Anglo-American Democracies. Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Colton, Timothy. 2000. Transitional Citizens. Voters and What Influences Them in the New Russia. London: Harvard University Press.
3.
Colton Timothy, and Michael McFaul. 2000. “Reinventing Russia’s Party of Power: “Unity and the 1999 Duma Election.”Post-Soviet Affairs16: 201-224.
4.
Dunleavy, Patrick, and Christopher Husbands. 1985. British Democracy at the Crossroads. London: Allen and Unwin.
5.
Erikson, Robert, and John Goldthorpe. 1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6.
Evans, Geoffrey. 1992. “Testing the Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema.”European Sociological Review8: 211-232.
7.
Evans, Geoffrey. 1993. “Class, Prospects and the Life-Cycle: Explaining the Association between Class Position and Political Preferences.”Acta Sociologica36: 263-276.
8.
Evans, Geoffrey. 1997. “Class Inequality and Formation of Politics Interests in Eastern Europe.”European Journal of Sociology38: 207-234.
9.
Evans, Geoffrey, ed. 1999. The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Anthony Heath. 1995. “The Measurement of Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoritarian Values: Comparing Balanced and Unbalanced Scales.”Quality and Quantity29: 191-206.
11.
Evans, Geoffrey, Anthony Heath, and Mansur Lalljee. 1996. “Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoritarian Values in the British Electorate.”British Journal of Sociology47: 93-112.
12.
Evans, Geoffrey, Anthony Heath, and Clive Payne1991. “Modelling the Class/Party Relationship 1964-87.”Electoral Studies10: 99-117.
13.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Colin Mills. 1999. “Are there Classes in Post-Communist Societies? A New Approach to Identifying Class Structure.”Sociology33: 23-46.
14.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 1993. “Identifying the Bases of Carty Competition in Eastern Europe.”British Journal of Political Science23: 521-548.
15.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 1998. “The Evolution of Left and Right in Post-Soviet Russia.”Europe-Asia Studies45: 1023-1042.
16.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 1999a. “The Emergence of Class Politics and Class Voting in Post-Communist Russia.” In Geoffrey Evans, ed., The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 1999b. Examining Social Class in Post-Communist Russia: An application of the Goldthorpe Class Schema. Department for International Development Report, London.
18.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 2000. “Explaining the Formation of Electoral Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies.” In H. D. Klingemann, E. Mochmann, and K. Newton, eds., Elections in Central and Eastern Europe: The First Wave, pp. 36-68. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
19.
Goldthorpe, John, 1996. “Class and Politics in Advanced Industrial Societies.” In D. J. Lee, and B. S. Turner, eds., Conflicts about Class: Debating Inequality in Late Industrialism. London: Longman.
20.
Hanson, Stephen. 2003. “Instrumental Democracy: The End of Ideology and the Decline of Russian Political Parties.” In V. L. Hesli and W. Reisinger, eds., The 1999-2000 Elections In Russia: Their Impact And Legacy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, John Curtice, Geoffrey Evans, J. Field, and S. Witherspoon. 1991. Understanding Political Change: The British Voter 1964-1987. Oxford: Pergamon.
22.
Hesli, Vicki. 2003. “Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in Russia: The Political Landscape in 1999 and 2000.” In V. L. Hesli and W. Reisinger, eds., The 1999-2000 Elections In Russia: Their Impact And Legacy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
23.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1992. “The Formation of Party Systems in East Central Europe.”Politics and Society20: 7-50.
25.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1981. Political Man, expand. ed.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1994. “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited.”American Sociological Review59: 1-22.
28.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspectives, pp. 1-64. New York: Free Press.
McFaul, Michael. 1997. Russia’s 1996 Presidential Election: The End of Polarized Politics. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
31.
Macrae, Duncan Jr.1967. Parliament, Parties and Society in France 1946-1958. London: Macmillan.
32.
Manza, Jeff, Michael Hout, and Clem Brooks. 1995. “Class Voting in Capitalist Democracies Since WWII.”Annual Review of Sociology21: 137-163.
33.
Marsh, Christopher. 2002. Russia at the Polls. Voters, Elections, and Democratization. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
34.
Marshall, Gordon, Stephen Roberts, Carole Burgoyne, Adam Swift, David Routh, 1995. “Class, Gender, and the Asymmetry Hypothesis.”European Sociological Review11: 1-15.
35.
Mikhalev, Vladimir, ed. 2003. Inequality and Social Structure during the Transition. London: Macmillan.
36.
Mygakov, M.2003. “The Duma Elections: A Step Toward Democracy or the Elites’ Game?” In V. L. Hesli and W. Reisinger, eds., The 1999-2000 Elections In Russia: Their Impact And Legacy. Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.
37.
Ost, David1993. “The Politics of Interest in Post-Communist Societies.”Theory and Society22: 453-485.
38.
Ost, David1995. “Labour, Class and Democracy; Shaping Political Antagonisms in Post-Communist Society.” In B. Crawford, ed. Markets, States, and Democracy: the Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39.
Przeworski, Adam. 1985. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Rose Richard, and Neil Munro2002. Elections Without Order. Russia’s Challenge to Vladimir Putin. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Rose, Richard, Neil Munro, and Stephen White2000. How Strong is Vladimir Putin’s Appeal. Glasgow: CSPP Publications, U. Strathclyde Press, SPP 332.
42.
Rose, Richard, Evgenii Tikhomirov, and William Mishler. 1997. “Understanding Multi-Party Choice: The 1995 Duma Election.”Europe-Asia Studies49: 799-824.
43.
Sakwa, Richard. 1996. Russian Politics and Society, 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
44.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1969. “From the Sociology of Politics to Political Sociology.” In S. M. Lipset ed., Politics and the Social Sciences, pp. 65-100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Saunders, Peter R.1986. Social Theory and the Urban Question, 2nd ed.London: Hutchinson.
46.
Timoshenko, T. I. 1995. “Rossiyskie partii, dvizheniya i bloki no vyborakh v gosudarstvenniyo dumu 17 dekabrya 1995: opyt, problemy, perspektivy.” Vestnik MGU Seriya 12, Politicheskie Nauki: 22-30.
47.
Vite, O. T.1994. “Tsentrizm v rossiyskoy politike rasstonovka sil v gosudarstvennoy dume i vne ee.”Polis4: 29-36.
48.
White, Stephen, Matthew Wyman, and Sarah Oates. 1997. “Parties and Voters in the 1995 Russian Duma Election.”Europe-Asia Studies49: 767-798.
49.
White, Stephen, Richard Rose, and Ian McAllister. 1997. How Russia Votes. Chatham NJ: Chatham House.
50.
Whitefield, Stephen, and Geoffrey Evans. 1994. “The Russian Election of 1993: Public Opinion and the Transition Experience.”Post-Soviet Affairs10: 38-60.
51.
Whitefield, Stephen, and Geoffrey Evans. 1996. “Support for Democracy and Political Opposition in Russia, 1993-95.”Post-Soviet Affairs12: 218-242.
52.
Whitefield, Stephen, and Geoffrey Evans. 1998. “The Emerging Structure of Partisan Divisions in Russian Politics.” In M. Wyman, S. White, and S. Oates, eds., Elections and Voters in Post-Communist Russia, pp. 68-99. London: Edward Elgar.
53.
Whitefield, Stephen, and Geoffrey Evans. 1999. “Class, Markets and Partisanship in Post-Soviet Russia: 1993-96.”Electoral Studies18: 155-178.
54.
Wyman Matthew, Stephen White, William Miller, and Paul Heywood. 1995. “Public Opinion, Parties and Voters in the December 1993 Russian Elections.”Europe-Asia Studies47: 195-228.
