The theory of racially polarized voting suggests that race is a primary determinant of vote choice in elections where a minority candidate is pitted against a white candidate. The spatial model of voting suggests that voters consider the issue positions of candidates and choose the candidate closest to their own positions. The unique context of the 2001 Los Angeles city election allows us to test these two theories. In each of two races in this election, a Latino candidate competed against a white candidate. In one race the white candidate was considered more liberal, while in the other race the Latino candidate was seen as more liberal. This particular ethnic and ideological composition provides us with a natural experimenting which to test the two competing theories. While voter ethnicity mattered, we show that consistent with the spatial model, voters also relied on issues and ideology as factors in their voting choices. By considering the choices voters are making in two different elections, we argue that estimates of the extent of racial voting in previous research may be overstated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, Paul R., John Aldrich, and David Rohde. 2002. “Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections.”Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2.
Achen, Christopher H., and W. Phillips Shively. 1995. “Cross-Level Inference.”Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1995. “Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Election.”American Journal of Political Science39: 714-744.
4.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998a. “Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Election.”American Journal of Political Science42: 1349-1363.
5.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998b. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multi-Party Elections.”American Journal of Political Science42: 55-96.
6.
Anderson, Christopher. 1995. Blaming the Government. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
7.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Randall W. Partin. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.”American Political Science Review89: 99-107.
8.
Barrett, Beth. “Villaraigosa Refusal to Hit Back Cost Him; Rivals Attack Ad Went Unanswered.”Daily New of Los Angeles. June 7, 2001, pp. N9-N9.
9.
Berelson, Bernard, and Paul Lazarsfeld. 1944. The Peoples Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.
10.
Betancur J., and D. C. Gills, eds. 2000. “The Restructuring of Urban Relations: Recent Challenges and Dilemmas for African Americans and Latinos in U.S. Cities.” In The Collaborative City: Opportunities and Struggles for blacks and Latinos in U.S. Cities. New York: Garland.
11.
Betancur J., and D. C. Gills2000. “The African American and Latino Coalition Experience In Chicago Under Mayor Harold Washington.” In The Collaborative City: Opportunities and Struggles for blacks and Latinos in U.S. Cities. New York: Garland.
12.
Brady, Henry E., and Paul M. Sniderman. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.”American Political Science Review79: 1061-1078.
13.
Brody, Richard A., and Benjamin I. Page. 1972. “The Assessment of Policy Voting.”American Political Science Review66: 450-458.
14.
Browning, Rufus, Dale Rogers Marshall, and David H. Tabb. 1984. Protest is Not Enough: The Struggle of blacks and Hispanics for Equality in Urban Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Bullock, Charles. 1984. “Racial Crossover Voting and the Election of Black Officials.”Journal of Politics46: 238-251.
16.
Butler, David, and Dennis Kavanagh. 2002. The British General Election of 2001. Palgrave, NY: Macmillan.
17.
Campbell, Angus. 1964. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
18.
Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1964. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
19.
Cameron, Charles, David Epstein, and Sharyn O’Halloran. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive black Representation in Congress?”American Political Science Review90 (4): 794-812.
20.
Canon, David T.1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
21.
Carmines, Edward G., and Paul M. Sniderman. 1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.”. American Political Science Review74: 78-91.
23.
Carsey, Thomas M.1995. “The Contextual Eects of Race on White Voting Behavior: The 1989 New York City Mayoral Election.”Journal of Politics57: 221-228.
24.
Carsey, Thomas M., and Gerald C. Wright. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.”American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 994-1002.
25.
Calvert, Randall. 2002. “Identity, Expression, and Rational-Choice Theory.” In Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds., Political Science: State of The Discipline. New York: Norton.
26.
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
28.
Enelow, James M., and Melvin J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Feldman, Stanley. 1982. “Economic Self-Interest and Political Behavior.”American Journal of Political Science26: 446-466.
30.
Freedman, D., S. P. Klein, J. Sacks, C. A. Smyth, and C. G. Everett. 1991. “Ecological Regression and Voting Rights.”Evaluation Review15: 673-711.
31.
Garza v. County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors. 918 F.2d 763 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied 111 S. Ct. 681 (1991).
32.
Giles, Michael W., and Melanie A. Buckner. 1993. “David Duke and Black Threat: An Old Hypothesis Revisited.”The Journal of Politics55: 702-713.
33.
Gomez, Brad T., and J. Matthew Wilson. 2001. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.”American Journal of Political Science45: 899-914.
Grofman, Bernard. 1991. “Statistics without Substance: A Critique of Freedman, et al. and Clark and Morrison.”Evaluation Review15: 746-769.
36.
Grofman Bernard, and Chandler Davidson, eds. 1992. Controversies in Minority Voting. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
37.
Grofman, Bernard, and Lisa Handley. 1994.” Estimating the Impact of Voting-Rights-Related Districting on Democratic Strength in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In Bernard Grofman, ed., Race and Redistricting in the 1990s. New York: Agathon.
38.
Guinier, Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. Free Press.
39.
Gurin, P., S. Hatchett, and J. S. Jackson. 1989. Hope and Independence: Blacks’ Response to Electoral and Party Politics. New York: Sage.
40.
Handley, Lisa, Bernard Grofman, and Wayne Arden. 1994. “Electing Minority-Preferred Candidates to Legislative Oce: The Relationship Between Minority Percentages in Districts and the Election of Minority-Preferred Candidates.” In Bernard Grofman, ed., Race and Redistricting in the 1990s. New York: Agathon.
41.
Hero, Rodney. 1987. “The Election of Hispanics in City Government: An Examination of the Election of Federico Pena as Mayor of Denver.”Western Political Quarterly40 (1): 93-105.
42.
Hinich, Melvin J, and Walker Pollard. 1981. ”A New Approach to the Spatial Theory of Electoral Competition.”American Journal of Political Science25: 323-341.
43.
Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael C. Munger. 1996. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
44.
Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael C. Munger. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Carol Weitzel Kohfeld. 1989. Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
46.
Iyengar, Shanto. 1989. “How Citizens Think About National Issues: A Matter of Responsibility.”American Journal of Political Science33: 878-900.
47.
Johnston, Richard, et al.1992. Letting the People Decide. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
Kaufmann, Karen M.2004. The Urban Voter. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
49.
Key, V. O.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.
50.
Key, V. O., Jr.1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Kinder, Donald R., and Lynn M. Sanders. 1996. Divided by Color. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
52.
King, Gary. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation”American Journal of Political Science44: 341-355.
54.
Knight, Kathleen. 1985. “Ideology in the 1980 Election: Ideological Sophistication Does Matter.”Journal of Politics47: 828-853.
55.
Kousser, J. Morgan. 1999. Colorblind Injustice. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
56.
Lai, James S.1999. “Racially Polarized Voting and its Eects on the Formation of a Viable Latino-Asian Pacic Coalition.”1998-1999 National Asian Pacic American Political Almanac. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
57.
Lau, Richard R., and David O. Sears. 1981. “Cognitive Links Between Economic Grievances and Political Responses.”Political Behavior3: 279-302.
58.
Lichtman, Alan. 1991. “Passing the Test: Ecological Regression Analysis in the Los Angeles County Voting Rights Case and Beyond.”Evaluation Review15: 770-799.
59.
Los Angeles Times Poll, Study 460: Exit Poll, Los Angeles City General Election, June 5, 2001. Computer File.
60.
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
Marinucci, Carla. 2001a. “Hahn Wins L. A. Mayor Race: Villaraigosa Falls Short in Battle between Two Liberal Democrats.”San Francisco Chronicle. June 6, 2001, pp. A1-A1.
62.
Marinucci, Carla. 2001b. “Latino Voters; Latinos Wielding Greater Political Clout; Delgadillo Draws Attention after Victory.”San Francisco Chronicle. June 10, 2001, pp. A3-A3.
63.
Mendelberg, Tali. 1997. “Executing Hortons: Racial Crime in the 1988 Presidential Campaign.”Public Opinion Quarterly61: 134-157.
64.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univesity Press.
65.
Munoz, Carlos, and Charles Henry. 1986“Rainbow Coalitions in Four Big Cities: San Antonio, Denver, Chicago, and Philadelphia.”PS19 (3): 598-609.
66.
Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John Petrocik. 1979. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Orlov, Rick. 2001.” It Will Be Hahn v. Villaraigosa; Soboro Finishes Third in Mayors Race.”Daily News of Los Angeles. April 11, pp. N1-N1.
68.
Popkin, Samuel L.1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Poole, Keith, and Howard Rosenthal. 2000. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70.
Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.”American Political Science Review83: 93-121.
71.
Robinson, William S.1950. “Ecological Correlation and the Behavior of Individuals.”American Sociological Review: 351-357.
72.
Saito, Leland. 1993. “Asian Americans and Latinos in San Gabriel Valley, California: Ethnic Political Cooperation and Redistricting 1990-92.”Amerasia Journal19 (2): 55-68.
73.
Schuman, Howard, Charlotte Steeh, Lawrence Bobo, and Maria Krysan, 1997. Racial Attitudes in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
Schaffner, Brian F., and Matthew J. Streb. 2002. “The Partisan Heuristic in Low-Information Elections.”Public Opinion Quarterly66: 559-581.
75.
Schaffner, Brian F.., Matthew J. Streb, and Gerald C. Wright. 2001. “Players without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Locall Elections.”Political Research Quarterly54: 7-30.
76.
Sears, D. O., and Kinder D. R.1971. Racial Tensions in Los Angeles. In W. Z. Hersch, ed., Los Angeles: Viability and Prospects for Metropolitan Leadership. New York: Praeger.
77.
Shaw, Daron R.1997. “Estimating Racially Polarized Voting: A View From the States.”Political Research Quarterly50: 49-74.
78.
Sigelman, Carol K, Lee Sigelman, Barbara J. Walkosz, and Michael Nitz. 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.”American Journal of Political Science39: 243-265.
79.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Edward G. Carmines. 1997. Reading Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Thomas Piazza. 1993. The Scar of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
81.
Sonenshein, Raphael. 1989. “The Dynamics of Biracial Coalitions: Crossover Politics in Los Angeles.”Western Political Quarterly42 (2): 333-353.
82.
Sonenshein, Raphael. 1997. “Post-Incorporation Politics in Los Angeles.” In Rufus Browning, Dale Rogers Marshall, and David H. Tabb, eds., Racial Politics in American Cities. New York: Longman.
83.
Sonenshein, Raphael, and Susan H. Pinkus. 2002. “The Dynamics of Latino Political Incorporation: The 2001 Los Angeles Mayoral Election as Seen in Los Angeles Times Exit Polls.”PS35: 1-1.
84.
Squire, Peverill, and Eric R. A. N. Smith. 1988. “The Effect of Partisan Information on Voters in Nonpartisan Elections.”Journal of Politics50: 169-179.
85.
Swain, Carol. 1994. Black Faces, Black Interests. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
86.
Tam, Wendy K.1995. “Asians-A Monolithic Voting Bloc?”Political Behavior17: 223-249.
87.
Tam Cho, Wendy K.1999. “Naturalization, Socialization, Participation: Immigrants and (Non-) Voting”Journal of Politics61: 1140-1155.
88.
Tate, K.1991. “Black Political Participation in the 1994 and 1988 Presidential Elections.”American Political Science Review85 (4): 1159-1176.
89.
Thernstrom, Abigail. 1987. Whose Votes Count? Armative Action and Minority Voting Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90.
Uhlaner, Carol. 1991. “Coalition Prospects Amongst Asians, blacks and Latino.” In Byron O. Jackson and Michael B. Preston, eds., Racial and Ethnic Politics in California. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Government Studies.
91.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Proles of General Demographic Characteristics, 2000 Census of Population and Housing, California. Washington, DC.
92.
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Voting Section. Introduction to Federal Voting Rights Laws. (Act created in 1965). www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting/intro/introb.htm.
93.
Voss, Stephen D.1996. “Beyond Racial Threat: Failure of an Old Hypothesis in the New South.”Journal of Politics58: 1156-1170.
94.
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1983. “Economic Voting and the Symbolic Politics’ Argument: A Reinterpretation and Synthesis.”American Political Science Review77: 158-174.
95.
Welch, Matt. 2001. “Demographic Revolution; Mayo’s Race Ignored the Biggest Issue.”Daily News of Los Angeles June 24, pp V1-V1.
96.
Welch, Susan. 2001. Race and Place: Race Relations in an American City. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
97.
Werner, Erica. 2001. “Tone, Pace Heat Up with Mayoral Election Days Away.”Associated Press State and Local Wire, State and Regional June 3.
98.
Wildermuth, John. 2001. “Race Card Emerges in L.A. Mayor Contest; Front-Runnersad Called Offensive as Election Nears. San Francisco Chronicle June 3, pp. A1-A1.
99.
Wright, Gerald C.1977. “Contextual Models of Electoral Behavior: The Souther Wallace Vote.”American Political Science Review74: 497-508
100.
Wright, Gerald C., and M. B. Berkman. 1986. “Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections.”American Political Science Review80: 567-588.
