The president’s ability to influence the national policy agenda is an important component of presidential power. Although some maintain that presidents are favorably situated to set agendas, others demonstrate that the president’s agenda-setting skills vary considerably by policy area. What is more, scholars have yet to examine the impact presidents have had focusing attention on the economy, an issue of vital importance to their political success. Extending previous research on presidential agenda setting that did not address economic policy (Edwards and Wood 1999; Wood and Peake 1998), we test the impact that the president’s public statements on the economy have on media and congressional attention to the economy. Using Vector Autoregression (VAR), we demonstrate that although presidents have some influence over the economic agenda, presidents are primarily responsive to media coverage of the economy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alt, James E., Gary King, and Curtis S. Signorino. 2001. “Aggregation among Binary, Count, and Duration Models: Estimating the Same Quantities from Different Levels of Data.”Political Analysis9 (1): 21-45.
2.
Baker, William F. and George Dessart. 1998. Down the Tube: An Inside Account of the Failure of American Television. New York: Basic Books.
3.
Baum, Matthew A., and Samuel Kernell. 1999. “Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?”American Political Science Review93: 99-114.
4.
Baumgartner, Frank and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Bennett, W. Lance. 2003. News: the Politics of Illusion. 5th ed.New York: Longman.
6.
Campbell, James E.2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
7.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2001. “The President’s Legislative Influence from Public Appeals.”American Journal of Political Science45: 313-329.
8.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Scott de Marchi. 2002. “Presidential Approval and Legislative Success.”Journal of Politics64 (May): 491-509.
9.
Cohen, Jeffrey E.1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.”American Journal of Political Science39: 87-107.
10.
DeRouen, Karl, Jr. and Jeffrey S. Peake. 2002. “The Dynamics of Diversion: The Domestic Implications of Presidential Use of Force.”International Interactions28: 191-211.
11.
Edwards, George C. III. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Edwards, George C., III and Andrew Barrett. 2000. “Presidential Agenda Setting in Congress.” In Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, eds., Polarized Politics. Washington DC: CQ Press.
13.
Edwards, George C. III and Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha. 2001. “Presidential Persuasion: Does the Public Respond?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.
14.
Edwards, George C. III, William Mitchell, and Reed Welch. 1995. “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Importance of Issue Salience.”American Journal of Political Science39: 108-134.
15.
Edwards, George C. III and B. Dan Wood. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.”American Political Science Review93: 327-344.
16.
Flemming, Roy B., B. Dan Wood, and John Bohte. 1999. “Attention to Issues in a System of Separated Powers: The Macrodynamics of American Policy Agendas.”Journal of Politics61: 76-108.
17.
Foote, Joe S.1990. Television Access and Political Power. New York: Praeger.
18.
Fordham, Benjamin. 1998. “The Politics of Threat Perception and the Use of Force: A Political Economy Model of U.S. Uses of Force, 1949-1994.”International Studies Quarterly42: 567-590.
19.
Freeman, John, John Williams, and Tsemin Lin. 1989. “Vector Autoregression and the Study of Politics.”American Journal of Political Science33: 842-877.
20.
Gormley, William T.1986. “Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System.”Polity18: 595-620.
21.
Granger, Clive. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Models.”Econometrica37: 424-438.
22.
Hill, Kim Quaile. 1998. “The Policy Agendas of the President and the Mass Public: A Research Validation and Extension.”American Journal of Political Science42: 1328-1334.
23.
Hetherington, Marc J.1996. “The Media’s Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992.”American Journal of Political Science40: 372-395.
24.
Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Iyengar, Shanto, Mark D. Peters, and Donald R. Kinder. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.”American Political Science Review76: 848-858.
26.
Kernell, Samuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, 3rd edition. Washington DC: CQ Press.
27.
Kingdon, John W.1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
28.
Krosnick, Jon A. and Donald R. Kinder. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming.”American Political Science Review84: 497-512.
29.
Lawrence, Adam B. 2003. “What Presidents Say and Why it Matters: The Influence of Presidential Rhetoric on the Public Agenda, 1946-2002.” Paper delivered at the 2003 Midwest Political Science Association Meetings, Chicago.
30.
Lowi, Theodore J.1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice.”Public Administration Review32: 298-310.
31.
Lucas, Robert E., Jr., and Thomas J. Sargent, eds. 1981. Rational Expectations and Economic Practice, Vol. 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Page, Benjamin, and Robert Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Page, Benjamin, Robert Shapiro, and Glenn Dempsey. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?”American Political Science Review81: 23-43.
34.
Peake, Jeffrey S.2001. “Presidential Agenda Setting in Foreign Policy.”Political Research Quarterly54: 69-86.
35.
Peake, Jeffrey S. and Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha. 2003. “The Limits of Presidential Rhetoric: The Agenda-Setting Impact of Major Television Addresses.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
36.
Public Papers of the Presidents: Reagan-Clinton, 1981-2000, 20 vols. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
Ragsdale, Lyn. 1998. Vital Statistics on the Presidency. Washington: CQ Press.
38.
Schattschneider, E. E.1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
39.
Simms, Christopher. 1980. “Macroeconomics and Reality.”Econometrica48: 1-48.
40.
Wood, B. Dan, Christopher T. Owens, and Brandy M. Durham. 2002. “Presidential Rhetoric and Macroeconomic Performance.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston.
41.
Wood, B. Dan, and Jeffrey S. Peake. 1998. “The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting.”American Political Science Review, 92: 173-184.
